IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i7p3947-d780138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing the Effectiveness of a Blended Intervention to Reduce Suicidal Ideation among School Adolescents in Chile: A Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Núñez

    (Faculty of Psychology, Universidad de Talca, Talca 3460000, Chile
    Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Imhay, Santiago 8320000, Chile
    Associative Research Program, Center of Cognitive Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad de Talca, Talca 3460000, Chile)

  • Jorge Gaete

    (Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Imhay, Santiago 8320000, Chile
    Faculty of Education, Universidad de los Andes, Monseñor Álvaro del Portillo, 12455 Santiago, Chile)

  • Daniela Meza

    (Faculty of Psychology, Universidad de Talca, Talca 3460000, Chile)

  • Javiera Andaur

    (Faculty of Psychology, Universidad de Talca, Talca 3460000, Chile)

  • Jo Robinson

    (Orygen, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
    Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia)

Abstract

Suicidal ideation is prevalent in adolescents and is a marker for subsequent psychiatric vulnerability and symptom severity. Literature shows that blended care (integrating online and offline components in a treatment process) could improve the effectiveness and adherence of interventions targeting suicidal ideation in adolescents, but the evidence is inconclusive. Thus, we will test the effectiveness of a blended intervention to reduce suicidal ideation (primary outcome) in school settings using a single-blind two-armed cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT). The internet-based component corresponds to the Reframe-IT, a program encompassing eight online sessions based on cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) principles. The face-to-face intervention will be delivered through four CBT sessions. Additionally, we will assess the effect of the intervention on the following secondary outcomes: suicidal attempts, depressive symptoms, hopelessness, emotional regulation, and problem-solving skills. Primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed at post-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up. Finally, we will explore the mediation role of cognitive, emotional, and behavioral correlates of suicide on the effect of the intervention. Results will inform whether the intervention can reduce suicide among school adolescents and be implemented on a large scale in Chile.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Núñez & Jorge Gaete & Daniela Meza & Javiera Andaur & Jo Robinson, 2022. "Testing the Effectiveness of a Blended Intervention to Reduce Suicidal Ideation among School Adolescents in Chile: A Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:3947-:d:780138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/3947/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/3947/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Daniel Ebert & Anna-Carlotta Zarski & Helen Christensen & Yvonne Stikkelbroek & Pim Cuijpers & Matthias Berking & Heleen Riper, 2015. "Internet and Computer-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety and Depression in Youth: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Outcome Trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Patricia Breux & Dana E. Boccio, 2019. "Improving Schools’ Readiness for Involvement in Suicide Prevention: An Evaluation of the Creating Suicide Safety in Schools (CSSS) Workshop," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nick Midgley & Brenda Guerrero-Tates & Rose Mortimer & Julian Edbrooke-Childs & Jakob Mechler & Karin Lindqvist & Susan Hajkowski & Liat Leibovich & Peter Martin & Gerhard Andersson & George Vlaescu &, 2021. "The Depression: Online Therapy Study (D:OTS)—A Pilot Study of an Internet-Based Psychodynamic Treatment for Adolescents with Low Mood in the UK, in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Christina Gallinat & Markus Moessner & Sandra Apondo & Philipp A. Thomann & Sabine C. Herpertz & Stephanie Bauer, 2021. "Feasibility of an Intervention Delivered via Mobile Phone and Internet to Improve the Continuity of Care in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Sanne P. A. Rasing & Yvonne A. J. Stikkelbroek & Denise H. M. Bodden, 2019. "Is Digital Treatment the Holy Grail? Literature Review on Computerized and Blended Treatment for Depressive Disorders in Youth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Harald Baumeister & Yannik Terhorst & Cora Grässle & Maren Freudenstein & Rüdiger Nübling & David Daniel Ebert, 2020. "Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Gretchen J. Bjornstad & Shreya Sonthalia & Benjamin Rouse & Luke Timmons & Laura Whybra & Nick Axford, 2020. "PROTOCOL: A comparison of the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural interventions based on delivery features for elevated symptoms of depression in adolescents," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), March.
    6. Braciszewski, Jordan M. & Tzilos Wernette, Golfo K. & Moore, Roland S. & Bock, Beth C. & Stout, Robert L. & Chamberlain, Patricia, 2018. "A pilot randomized controlled trial of a technology-based substance use intervention for youth exiting foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 466-476.
    7. Matilda Berg & Gerhard Andersson & Alexander Rozental, 2020. "Knowledge About Treatment, Anxiety, and Depression in Association With Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adolescents: Development and Initial Evaluation of a New Test," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    8. Sanne P.A. Rasing & Yvonne A.J. Stikkelbroek & Wouter den Hollander & Heleen Riper & Maja Deković & Maaike H. Nauta & Daan H.M. Creemers & Marianne C.P. Immink & Mariken Spuij & Denise H.M. Bodden, 2021. "Pragmatic Quasi-Experimental Controlled Trial Evaluating the Outcomes of Blended CBT Compared to Face-to-Face CBT and Treatment as Usual for Adolescents with Depressive Disorders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Keya Ding & Hui Li, 2023. "Digital Addiction Intervention for Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:3947-:d:780138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.