IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16674-d1000659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acoustic Biotopes, Listeners and Sound-Induced Action: A Case Study of Operating Rooms

Author

Listed:
  • Elif Özcan

    (Critical Alarms Lab, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Cornelis L. H. Broekmeulen

    (Critical Alarms Lab, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Zoe Alexandra Luck

    (Critical Alarms Lab, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Monique van Velzen

    (Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands)

  • Pieter Jan Stappers

    (Department of Human-Centered Design, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Judy Reed Edworthy

    (School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK)

Abstract

As socio-technological environments shape and direct listener behaviour, an ecological account is needed that encompasses listening in complexity (i.e., multiple listeners, multiple sounds and their sources, and multiple sound-induced actions that ensure the success of a mission). In this study, we explored sound-induced action under the framework of “acoustic biotopes” (a notion of ecological acoustics by Smolders, Aertsen, and Johanessma, 1979 and 1982) in a specific socio-technological environment, i.e., the context of an orthopaedic operating room. Our approach is based on literature research into the topics of environmental psychology and auditory perception and action and in situ observations in healthcare with field recordings, participatory observations, and interviews on the spot. The results suggest a human-centered definition of sound-induced action in acoustic biotopes: Acoustic biotope is an active and shared sound environment with entangled interactions and sound-induced actions taking place in a specific space that has a critical function. Listening in highly functional environments is an individual experience and is influenced by hearing function, physical position and role in an environment, and the task at hand. There is a range of active and passive sound listeners as a function of their attentive state and listeners as sound sources within the acoustic biotope. There are many different sound sources and sound locals in socio-technological environments and sounds have great potential to serve critical information to operators. Overall, our study provides a holistic, multi-layered and yet a listener-centric view on the organisation of complex spaces and the results can immediately be applicable for rethinking the acoustic environment for ORs for better listening and sound-induced action.

Suggested Citation

  • Elif Özcan & Cornelis L. H. Broekmeulen & Zoe Alexandra Luck & Monique van Velzen & Pieter Jan Stappers & Judy Reed Edworthy, 2022. "Acoustic Biotopes, Listeners and Sound-Induced Action: A Case Study of Operating Rooms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16674-:d:1000659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16674/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16674/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fox, Nick J., 1997. "Space, sterility and surgery: Circuits of hygiene in the operating theatre," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 649-657, September.
    2. Gilles Laurent & Sandor Czellar & Thierry Lageat, 2003. "Engineering Hedonic Attributes to Generate Perceptions of Luxury: Consumer Perception of an Everyday Sound," Post-Print hal-00458437, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heine, Klaus & Phan, Michel, 2011. "Trading-up mass-market goods to luxury products," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 108-114.
    2. Abeysinghe, Sudeepa & Leppold, Claire & Ozaki, Akihiko & Morita, Mariko & Tsubokura, Masaharu, 2017. "Disappearing everyday materials: The displacement of medical resources following disaster in Fukushima, Japan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 117-124.
    3. Reynolds-McIlnay, Ryann & Morrin, Maureen, 2019. "Increasing Shopper Trust in Retailer Technological Interfaces via Auditory Confirmation," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 128-142.
    4. Puligadda, Sanjay & Ross, William T. & Chen, Jinjie & Howlett, Elizabeth, 2012. "When loyalties clash purchase behavior when a preferred brand is stocked out: The tradeoff between brand and store loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 570-577.
    5. Melo, Sara, 2018. "The role of place on healthcare quality improvement: A qualitative case study of a teaching hospital," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 136-142.
    6. Corina P. Tarţa & Ioan Plăiaş & Luis F. Martinez & Luisa M. Martinez, 2020. "The Role of Car Aesthetics on Consumers’ Decisions: An Example from Romania," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 67(1), pages 33-43, March.
    7. Machiels, Casparus J.A. & Orth, Ulrich R., 2017. "Verticality in product labels and shelves as a metaphorical cue to quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 195-203.
    8. Glenda Riley, Robin & Manias, Elizabeth, 2006. "Governance in operating room nursing: Nurses' knowledge of individual surgeons," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 1541-1551, March.
    9. Michel Clement & Björn Christensen & Sönke Albers & Steffen Guldner, 2007. "Was bringt ein Oscar im Filmgeschäft? Eine empirische Analyse unter Berücksichtigung des Selektionseffekts," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 198-220, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16674-:d:1000659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.