IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15460-d980474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing Use of Fitness Apps by Adults under Influence of COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Yanlong Guo

    (Social Innovation Design Research Centre, Anhui University, Hefei 203106, China
    Anhui Institute of Contemporary Studies, Anhui Academy of Social Sciences, Hefei 203106, China)

  • Xueqing Ma

    (Social Innovation Design Research Centre, Anhui University, Hefei 203106, China)

  • Denghang Chen

    (Department of Science and Technology Communication, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 203106, China
    Research Center for Science Communication, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 203106, China)

  • Han Zhang

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

Abstract

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many countries imposed restrictions and quarantines on the population, which led to a decrease in people’s physical activity (PA) and severely damaged their mental health. As a result, people engaged in fitness activities with the help of fitness apps, which improved their resistance to the virus and reduced the occurrence of psychological problems, such as anxiety and depression. However, the churn rate of fitness apps is high. As such, our purpose in this study was to analyze the factors that influence the use of fitness apps by adults aged 18–65 years in the context of COVID-19, with the aim of contributing to the analysis of mobile fitness user behavior and related product design practices. We constructed a decision target program model using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and we analyzed and inductively screened 11 evaluation indicators, which we combined with an indicator design questionnaire. We distributed 420 questionnaires; of the respondents, 347 knew about or used fitness apps. Among these 347, we recovered 310 valid questionnaires after removing invalid questionnaires with a short completion time, for an effective questionnaire recovery rate of 89.33%. We used the AHP and entropy method to calculate and evaluate the weight coefficient of each influencing factor and to determine an influencing factor index. Our conclusions were as follows: first, the effect of perceived usefulness on the use of fitness apps by the study groups was the most notable. Second, personal motivation and perceived ease of use considerably influenced the adult group’s willingness to use fitness apps. Finally, the perceived cost had relatively little effect on the use of fitness apps by adults, and the study group was much more concerned with the privacy cost than the expense cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanlong Guo & Xueqing Ma & Denghang Chen & Han Zhang, 2022. "Factors Influencing Use of Fitness Apps by Adults under Influence of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15460-:d:980474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15460/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15460/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Yogi Tri Prasetyo & Godwin M. Bagon & Christian Hope S. Dadulo & Nathaniel O. Hortillosa & Morrissey A. Mercado & Thanatorn Chuenyindee & Reny Nadlifatin & Satria Fadil Persada, 2022. "Investigating Factors Affecting Behavioral Intention among Gym-Goers to Visit Fitness Centers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Integrating Physical Activity Maintenance Theory and Social Cognitive Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    3. Lapo Mola & Quentin Berger & Karoliina Haavisto & Isabella Soscia, 2020. "Mobility as a Service: An Exploratory Study of Consumer Mobility Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Shin-Yi Lin & Pin-Ju Juan & Sheng-Wei Lin, 2020. "A TAM Framework to Evaluate the Effect of Smartphone Application on Tourism Information Search Behavior of Foreign Independent Travelers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Salma Azzouzi & Catherine Stratton & Laura Paulina Muñoz-Velasco & Kangxin Wang & Maryam Fourtassi & Bo-Young Hong & Rory Cooper & Joseph K. Balikuddembe & Angela Palomba & Mark Peterson & Uma Pandiya, 2022. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors and Perceived Mental and Physical Health of People Living with Non-Communicable Diseases: An International Cross-Sectional Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Mijeong Park & Hana Yoo & Jeongeun Kim & Jisan Lee, 2018. "Why do young people use fitness apps? Cognitive characteristics and app quality," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 755-761, December.
    7. Li Crystal Jiang & Mengru Sun & Guanxiong Huang, 2022. "Uncovering the Heterogeneity in Fitness App Use: A Latent Class Analysis of Chinese Users," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-12, August.
    8. San-Martín, Sonia & Prodanova, Jana & Jiménez, Nadia, 2015. "The impact of age in the generation of satisfaction and WOM in mobile shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 1-8.
    9. Ekkapong Cheunkamon & Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao & Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha, 2020. "Determinant Factors Influencing Thai Tourists’ Intentions to Use Social Media for Travel Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    10. Jae-Yoon Kwon & Ji-Suk Lee & Tae-Seung Park, 2022. "Analysis of Strategies to Increase User Retention of Fitness Mobile Apps during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-12, August.
    11. Seung-hye Jung & Joon-ho Kim & Ha-na Cho & Hae-won Lee & Hyun-ju Choi, 2021. "Brand Personality of Korean Dance and Sustainable Behavioral Intention of Global Consumers in Four Countries: Focusing on the Technological Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Elke Humer & Thomas Probst & Jolana Wagner-Skacel & Christoph Pieh, 2022. "Association of Health Behaviors with Mental Health Problems in More than 7000 Adolescents during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-6, July.
    13. Sandra Haider & Lee Smith & Lovro Markovic & Felipe B. Schuch & Kabir P. Sadarangani & Guillermo Felipe Lopez Sanchez & Rubén Lopez-Bueno & Alejandro Gil-Salmerón & Anita Rieder & Mark A. Tully & Lena, 2021. "Associations between Physical Activity, Sitting Time, and Time Spent Outdoors with Mental Health during the First COVID-19 Lock Down in Austria," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-12, August.
    14. Łukasz Markiewicz & Rafał Muda & Elżbieta Kubińska & Paweł Augustynowicz, 2020. "An explanatory analysis of perceived risk decision weights (perceived-risk attitudes) and perceived benefit decision weights (perceived-benefit attitudes) in risk-value models," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 739-761, June.
    15. Erlane K. Ghani & Mazurina Mohd Ali & Muhammad Nazmy Rezzaimy Musa & Akrom A. Omonov, 2022. "The Effect of Perceived Usefulness, Reliability, and COVID-19 Pandemic on Digital Banking Effectiveness: Analysis Using Technology Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.
    16. Alex Fenton & Anna Mary Cooper-Ryan & Mariann (Maz) Hardey & Wasim Ahmed, 2022. "Football Fandom as a Platform for Digital Health Promotion and Behaviour Change: A Mobile App Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-17, July.
    17. Priyanka Gupta & Sanjeev Prashar & T. Sai Vijay & Chandan Parsad, 2021. "Examining the influence of antecedents of continuous intention to use an informational app: the role of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 36(2), pages 270-287.
    18. Chia-Jung Chang & Bryan Cheng-Yu Hsu & Mei-Yen Chen, 2021. "Viewing Sports Online during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Antecedent Effects of Social Presence on the Technology Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Wenyu Zang & Yuhao Qian & Hemin Song, 2022. "The Effect of Perceived Value on Consumers’ Repurchase Intention of Commercial Ice Stadium: The Mediating Role of Community Interactions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-14, March.
    20. Poonyawat Kusonwattana & Yogi Tri Prasetyo & Stefanus Vincent & Jefferson Christofelix & Aryadaksa Amudra & Hazel Juan Montgomery & Michael Nayat Young & Reny Nadlifatin & Satria Fadil Persada, 2022. "Determining Factors Affecting Behavioral Intention to Organize an Online Event during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yavas, Volkan & Yavaş Tez, Özge, 2023. "Consumer intention over upcoming utopia: Urban air mobility," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    2. Sohn, Stefanie, 2017. "A contextual perspective on consumers' perceived usefulness: The case of mobile online shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 22-33.
    3. Groß, Michael, 2018. "Heterogeneity in consumers’ mobile shopping acceptance: A finite mixture partial least squares modelling approach for exploring and characterising different shopper segments," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 8-18.
    4. Ukrit Suksanguan & Somsak Siwadamrongpong & Thanapong Champahom & Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao & Tassana Boonyoo & Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha, 2022. "Structural Equation Model of Factors Influencing the Selection of Industrial Waste Disposal Service in Cement Kilns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Christian Arnold & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2019. "Determinants of Industrial Internet of Things Adoption in German Manufacturing Companies," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.
    7. Awni Rawashdeh, 2013. "Study Toward The Understanding Of Behavioral Intention To Use A Customer Relationship Management (Crm) Systems," Far East Journal of Psychology and Business, Far East Research Centre, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, September.
    8. Melih Engin & Fatih Gürses, 2019. "Adoption of Hospital Information Systems in Public Hospitals in Turkey: An Analysis with the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.
    10. Morosan, Cristian, 2016. "An empirical examination of U.S. travelers’ intentions to use biometric e-gates in airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 120-128.
    11. Tsung Teng Chen, 2012. "The development and empirical study of a literature review aiding system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(1), pages 105-116, July.
    12. Lawrence Bunnell & Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson & Victoria Y. Yoon, 0. "RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-42.
    13. Issa Mohamed Al Dafaei & Zurida Ismail & Mohd Ali Samsudin & Firas Jalal Shakir, 2013. "The Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy towards the Relationship Between Attitudes And Level of Use Towards Instructional Computer Technology in Oman," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(12), pages 2382-2398, December.
    14. Abdesamad Zouine & Pierre Fenies, 2014. "The Critical Success Factors Of The ERP System Project: A Meta-Analysis Methodology," Post-Print hal-01419785, HAL.
    15. Debora Bettiga & Lucio Lamberti & Emanuele Lettieri, 2020. "Individuals’ adoption of smart technologies for preventive health care: a structural equation modeling approach," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 203-214, June.
    16. Mbassi, Christophe Martial & Messono, Omang Ombolo, 2023. "Historical technology and current economic development: Reassessing the nature of the relationship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    17. Luke Butcher & Ian Phau & Min Teah, 2016. "Brand prominence in luxury consumption: Will emotional value adjudicate our longing for status?," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(6), pages 701-715, November.
    18. Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani & T. Ramayah & Nalini Suppiah & Osama Alfarraj & Nasser Alalwan, 2020. "Modeling Blog Usage From a Developing Country Perspective Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    19. Sudip Bhattacharjee & Lewis Shaw, 2001. "Evidence that independent research projects improve accounting students' technology-related perceptions and skills," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 83-103.
    20. Chen-Yuan Chen & Bih-Yaw Shih & Shih-Hsien Yu, 2012. "Disaster prevention and reduction for exploring teachers’ technology acceptance using a virtual reality system and partial least squares techniques," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 62(3), pages 1217-1231, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15460-:d:980474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.