IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p14617-d965942.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Cognitive Strategies and Facial Attractiveness on Empathic Neural Responses

Author

Listed:
  • Michela Balconi

    (International Research Center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy
    Research Unit in Affective and Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy)

  • Natalia Kopiś-Posiej

    (Department of Clinical Neuropsychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland
    Department of Experimental Psychology, The Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)

  • Irene Venturella

    (Research Unit in Affective and Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy)

  • Emilia Zabielska-Mendyk

    (Department of Experimental Psychology, The Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)

  • Paweł Augustynowicz

    (Department of Experimental Psychology, The Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)

  • Laura Angioletti

    (International Research Center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy
    Research Unit in Affective and Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

Empathy is a phenomenon that brings together both emotions and an understanding of another person. Recent studies have disentangled the mechanisms of empathy into emotional and cognitive aspects. Event-related potential (ERP) studies suggest that emotional empathy is related to the modulation of the amplitude of early ERPs, and cognitive empathy is linked to later ERPs. In the current study, we examined the influences of facial attractiveness on empathic response and the effect of cognitive strategies with setting the participants’ attention to attractiveness or pain. Participants (N= 19) viewed photos of physically attractive and unattractive men and women receiving painful stimulation. The amplitude of the N2 component measured at the frontal regions was more negative in painful stimulation compared to the non-painful, but only for attractive faces. There were no differences between painful and non-painful stimulation for unattractive faces. The amplitude of the P3 measured at the central-parietal region component was more positive in the painful condition compared to the non-painful one, but only when participants performed a pain judgment task. There were no differences in the attractiveness judgment task. This study showed that the attractiveness of a model and drawing the participants’ attention to pain constitute an essential modulator of pain empathy.

Suggested Citation

  • Michela Balconi & Natalia Kopiś-Posiej & Irene Venturella & Emilia Zabielska-Mendyk & Paweł Augustynowicz & Laura Angioletti, 2022. "The Effect of Cognitive Strategies and Facial Attractiveness on Empathic Neural Responses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-11, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14617-:d:965942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14617/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14617/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert J. Fisher & Yu Ma, 2014. "The Price of Being Beautiful: Negative Effects of Attractiveness on Empathy for Children in Need," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(2), pages 436-450.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyunkyu Jang, 2022. "Cuteness mediates the effect of happy facial expressions on empathy and charitable donations," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 19(4), pages 675-689, December.
    2. Ernan Haruvy & Peter Popkowski Leszczyc & Greg Allenby & Russell Belk & Catherine Eckel & Robert Fisher & Sherry Xin Li & John A. List & Yu Ma & Yu Wang, 2020. "Fundraising design: key issues, unifying framework, and open puzzles," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 371-380, December.
    3. Kamatham, Sri Harsha & Pahwa, Parneet & Jiang, Juncai & Kumar, Nanda, 2021. "Effect of appeal content on fundraising success and donor behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 827-839.
    4. Arvid Erlandsson, 2021. "Seven (weak and strong) helping effects systematically tested in separate evaluation, joint evaluation and forced choice," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 16(5), pages 1113-1154, September.
    5. Bullard, Olya & Penner, Sara, 2017. "A regulatory-focused perspective on philanthropy: Promotion focus motivates giving to prevention-framed causes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 173-180.
    6. Choi, Jungsil & Li, Yexin Jessica & Rangan, Priyamvadha & Yin, Bingqing & Singh, Surendra N., 2020. "Opposites attract: Impact of background color on effectiveness of emotional charity appeals," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 644-660.
    7. Chen, Tong & Razzaq, Amar & Qing, Ping & Cao, Binbin, 2021. "Do you bear to reject them? The effect of anthropomorphism on empathy and consumer preference for unattractive produce," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    8. repec:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:5:p:1113-1154 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Septianto, Felix & Tjiptono, Fandy, 2019. "The interactive effect of emotional appeals and past performance of a charity on the effectiveness of charitable advertising," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 189-198.
    10. Grinstein, Amir & Hagtvedt, Henrik & Kronrod, Ann, 2019. "Aesthetically (dis)pleasing visuals: A dual pathway to empathy and prosocial behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 83-99.
    11. Abhishek Bhati & Ruth K. Hansen, 2020. "A literature review of experimental studies in fundraising," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(1).
    12. Fang, Shujie & Zhang, Chun & Li, Yaoqi, 2020. "Physical attractiveness of service employees and customer engagement in tourism industry," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    13. Zhu, Huawei & Wong, Nancy & Huang, Minxue, 2019. "Does relationship matter? How social distance influences perceptions of responsibility on anthropomorphized environmental objects and conservation intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 62-70.
    14. Li, Yaoqi & Zhang, Chun & Fang, Shujie, 2022. "Can beauty save service failures? The role of recovery employees’ physical attractiveness in the tourism industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 100-110.
    15. Seo, Kwanglim & Choi, Youngjoon & Shin, Joongwon, 2021. "Homelessness in destinations: Tourists' visit intention," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Li, Yaoqi & Zhang, Chun & Laroche, Michel, 2019. "Is beauty a premium? A study of the physical attractiveness effect in service encounters," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 215-225.
    17. Dang-Van, Thac & Vo-Thanh, Tan & Vu, Thinh Truong & Wang, Jianming & Nguyen, Ninh, 2023. "Do consumers stick with good-looking broadcasters? The mediating and moderating mechanisms of motivation and emotion," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14617-:d:965942. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.