IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p14273-d959984.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the Associations between Self-Reported Sleep Quality and Sleep Duration Concerning the Risk of Depression: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Vivi Leona Amelia

    (School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 110, Taiwan
    Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Purwokerto 53182, Indonesia)

  • Hsiu-Ju Jen

    (Department of Nursing, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan)

  • Tso-Ying Lee

    (Nursing Research Center, Nursing Department, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei City 110, Taiwan)

  • Li-Fang Chang

    (Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei City 110, Taiwan
    Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei City 114, Taiwan)

  • Min-Huey Chung

    (School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 110, Taiwan
    Department of Nursing, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan)

Abstract

There is substantial evidence that a lack of sleep quality and duration can increase the risk of depression in adults. Still, few studies have compared sleep quality and duration to the risk of depression in Indonesia. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the prevalence and risk of depression associated with both sleep quality and duration and identified those factors associated with sleep quality with sleep duration. This study was a cross-sectional study, and the data were obtained from the 2014 Indonesian Family Life Survey, with a total sample comprised of 19,675 respondents aged older than 15 years old. A self-reported questionnaire was used to assess sleep quality and duration. Depression was assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CESD-10) questionnaire. Logistic regression was used to examine the risk of depression, and multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the risk of poor sleep quality with consideration to sleep duration. The prevalence of depression was the highest in the poor sleep quality and long sleep duration groups (48.5%). After all variables associated with depression were adjusted, poor sleep quality was identified as a factor leading to a higher risk of depression (OR = 4.2; 95% CI: 3.7–4.6; p < 0.001) than long sleep duration (OR = 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2–1.6; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the interaction between poor sleep quality and long sleep duration gave the highest risk of depression (OR = 4.4; 95% CI: 3.6–5.3); p < 0.001). Multinomial logistic regression revealed that the factors leading to a significant increase in the risk of poor sleep quality, with consideration to sleep duration, in the population were age, gender, marital status, education, wealth index, physical activity, chronic illness, season, and urban area ( p < 0.05). Sleep quality was found to be associated with a higher risk of depression than sleep duration. The findings of this study may be beneficial to healthcare professionals who develop health promotion strategies for reducing the incidence of depression in communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Vivi Leona Amelia & Hsiu-Ju Jen & Tso-Ying Lee & Li-Fang Chang & Min-Huey Chung, 2022. "Comparison of the Associations between Self-Reported Sleep Quality and Sleep Duration Concerning the Risk of Depression: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in Indonesia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14273-:d:959984
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14273/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14273/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jens Hoebel & Ulrike E Maske & Hajo Zeeb & Thomas Lampert, 2017. "Social Inequalities and Depressive Symptoms in Adults: The Role of Objective and Subjective Socioeconomic Status," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher J. Wendel & Jenny M. Cundiff & Matthew R. Cribbet, 2022. "Early Adversity and Changes in Cortisol and Negative Affect in Response to Interpersonal Threats in the Laboratory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Choi, Minjae & Lee, Eun Hae & Sempungu, Joshua Kirabo & Lee, Yo Han, 2023. "Long-term trajectories of suicide ideation and its socioeconomic predictors: A longitudinal 8-year follow-up study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    3. Esteban Sánchez-Moreno & Lorena P. Gallardo-Peralta, 2022. "Income inequalities, social support and depressive symptoms among older adults in Europe: a multilevel cross-sectional study," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 663-675, September.
    4. Jayeun Kim & Ho Kim, 2017. "Demographic and Environmental Factors Associated with Mental Health: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Beatrice Thielmann & Robin Sebastian Schierholz & Irina Böckelmann, 2021. "Subjective and Objective Consequences of Stress in Subjects with Subjectively Different Sleep Quality—A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14273-:d:959984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.