IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p11960-d921569.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Realist Review of How Community-Based Drug Checking Services Could Be Designed and Implemented to Promote Engagement of People Who Use Drugs

Author

Listed:
  • Wendy Masterton

    (Salvation Army Centre for Addictions Services and Research, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK)

  • Danilo Falzon

    (Salvation Army Centre for Addictions Services and Research, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK)

  • Gillian Burton

    (Salvation Army Centre for Addictions Services and Research, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK)

  • Hannah Carver

    (Salvation Army Centre for Addictions Services and Research, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK)

  • Bruce Wallace

    (Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada)

  • Elizabeth V. Aston

    (School of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH11 4BN, UK)

  • Harry Sumnall

    (Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L2 2QP, UK)

  • Fiona Measham

    (Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZR, UK
    The Loop, Unclassified Community Interest Company, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Rosalind Gittins

    (Humankind, Bowburn DH6 5PF, UK)

  • Vicki Craik

    (Public Health Scotland, Glasgow G2 6QE, UK)

  • Joe Schofield

    (Salvation Army Centre for Addictions Services and Research, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK)

  • Simon Little

    (Kinbank Social Research Consultancy, Tayport DD6 9AP, UK)

  • Tessa Parkes

    (Salvation Army Centre for Addictions Services and Research, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK)

Abstract

With rising numbers of drug-related deaths in the UK and globally, exploration of interventions that seek to reduce drug-related harm is essential. Drug checking services (DCS) allow people to submit drug samples for chemical analysis and receive feedback about the sample, as well as harm reduction advice. The use of DCS is often linked to festival and/or nightlife settings and to so-called ‘recreational’ drug use, but research has also shown the potential of community-based DCS as an intervention serving more varied demographics of people who use drugs, including more marginalised individuals and those experiencing drug dependence. Whilst there is a growing evidence base on the effectiveness of drug checking as a harm reduction intervention, there is still limited evidence of the underlying mechanisms and processes within DCS which may aid implementation and subsequent engagement of people who use drugs. This presents a challenge to understanding why engagement differs across types of DCS, and how best to develop and deliver services across different contexts and for different populations. To explore the contexts and mechanisms which impact engagement in community-based DCS, a realist review was undertaken to synthesise the international evidence for the delivery and implementation of DCS. There were 133 sources included in the review. From these sources the underlying contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes relating to DCS implementation and engagement were developed and refined into seven programme theories. The findings of this review are theoretically novel and hold practical relevance for the design of DCS, with implications for optimisation, tailoring, and implementing services to reach individuals in different settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Wendy Masterton & Danilo Falzon & Gillian Burton & Hannah Carver & Bruce Wallace & Elizabeth V. Aston & Harry Sumnall & Fiona Measham & Rosalind Gittins & Vicki Craik & Joe Schofield & Simon Little & , 2022. "A Realist Review of How Community-Based Drug Checking Services Could Be Designed and Implemented to Promote Engagement of People Who Use Drugs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-25, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:11960-:d:921569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/11960/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/11960/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moore, David, 2004. "Governing street-based injecting drug users: a critique of heroin overdose prevention in Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(7), pages 1547-1557, October.
    2. Kennedy, Mary Clare & Boyd, Jade & Mayer, Samara & Collins, Alexandra & Kerr, Thomas & McNeil, Ryan, 2019. "Peer worker involvement in low-threshold supervised consumption facilities in the context of an overdose epidemic in Vancouver, Canada," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 60-68.
    3. Collins, Alexandra B. & Boyd, Jade & Cooper, Hannah L.F. & McNeil, Ryan, 2019. "The intersectional risk environment of people who use drugs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 234(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeff Ondocsin & Daniel Ciccarone & Lissa Moran & Simon Outram & Dan Werb & Laura Thomas & Emily A. Arnold, 2023. "Insights from Drug Checking Programs: Practicing Bootstrap Public Health Whilst Tailoring to Local Drug User Needs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Anthony Mullin & Mark Scott & Giorgia Vaccaro & Rosalind Gittins & Salvatore Ferla & Fabrizio Schifano & Amira Guirguis, 2023. "Handheld Raman Spectroscopy in the First UK Home Office Licensed Pharmacist-Led Community Drug Checking Service," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-27, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Collins, Alexandra B. & Boyd, Jade & Cooper, Hannah L.F. & McNeil, Ryan, 2019. "The intersectional risk environment of people who use drugs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 234(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Shannon, Kate & Kerr, Thomas & Allinott, Shari & Chettiar, Jill & Shoveller, Jean & Tyndall, Mark W., 2008. "Social and structural violence and power relations in mitigating HIV risk of drug-using women in survival sex work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(4), pages 911-921, February.
    3. DiStefano, Anthony S. & Hui, Brian & Barrera-Ng, Angelica & Quitugua, Lourdes F. & Peters, Ruth & Dimaculangan, Jeany & Vunileva, Isileli & Tui'one, Vanessa & Takahashi, Lois M. & Tanjasiri, Sora Park, 2012. "Contextualization of HIV and HPV risk and prevention among Pacific Islander young adults in Southern California," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(4), pages 699-708.
    4. McNeil, Ryan & Small, Will, 2014. "‘Safer environment interventions’: A qualitative synthesis of the experiences and perceptions of people who inject drugs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 151-158.
    5. Lazarus, L. & Chettiar, J. & Deering, K. & Nabess, R. & Shannon, K., 2011. "Risky health environments: Women sex workers’ struggles to find safe, secure and non-exploitative housing in Canada’s poorest postal code," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(11), pages 1600-1607.
    6. Moore, David & Fraser, Suzanne, 2006. "Putting at risk what we know: Reflecting on the drug-using subject in harm reduction and its political implications," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(12), pages 3035-3047, June.
    7. Small, Will & Maher, Lisa & Kerr, Thomas, 2014. "Institutional ethical review and ethnographic research involving injection drug users: A case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 157-162.
    8. Fiona Mercer & Joanna Astrid Miler & Bernie Pauly & Hannah Carver & Kristina Hnízdilová & Rebecca Foster & Tessa Parkes, 2021. "Peer Support and Overdose Prevention Responses: A Systematic ‘State-of-the-Art’ Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-24, November.
    9. Faulkner-Gurstein, Rachel, 2017. "The social logic of naloxone: Peer administration, harm reduction, and the transformation of social policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 20-27.
    10. Betsos, Alex & Valleriani, Jenna & Boyd, Jade & McNeil, Ryan, 2022. "Beyond co-production: The construction of drug checking knowledge in a Canadian supervised injection facility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    11. Schmidt-Sane, Megan, 2022. "Male partners of female sex workers: The intersectional risk environment of HIV/AIDS in a Kampala informal settlement," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    12. Kline, Nolan, 2022. "Syndemic statuses: Intersectionality and mobilizing for LGBTQ+ Latinx health equity after the Pulse shooting," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    13. Bardwell, Geoff & Small, Will & Lavalley, Jennifer & McNeil, Ryan & Kerr, Thomas, 2021. "“People need them or else they're going to take fentanyl and die”: A qualitative study examining the ‘problem’ of prescription opioid diversion during an overdose epidemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    14. Sam Wilson Beckham & Jennifer L. Glick & Kristin E. Schneider & Sean T. Allen & Lillian Shipp & Rebecca Hamilton White & Ju Nyeong Park & Susan G. Sherman, 2022. "Latent Classes of Polysubstance Use and Associations with HIV Risk and Structural Vulnerabilities among Cisgender Women Who Engage in Street-Based Transactional Sex in Baltimore City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-12, March.
    15. Samuel R. Friedman & Leslie D. Williams & Ashly E. Jordan & Suzan Walters & David C. Perlman & Pedro Mateu-Gelabert & Georgios K. Nikolopoulos & Maria R. Khan & Emmanuel Peprah & Jerel Ezell, 2022. "Toward a Theory of the Underpinnings and Vulnerabilities of Structural Racism: Looking Upstream from Disease Inequities among People Who Use Drugs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Moore, David, 2009. "'Workers', 'clients' and the struggle over needs: Understanding encounters between service providers and injecting drug users in an Australian city," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1161-1168, March.
    17. Carolyn Greene & Marta-Marika Urbanik & Kanika Samuels-Wortley, 2022. "“It Stays with You for Life”: The Everyday Nature and Impact of Police Violence in Toronto’s Inner-City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-11, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:11960-:d:921569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.