IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i11p6444-d824270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Field Evaluation of an Automated Pollen Sensor

Author

Listed:
  • Chenyang Jiang

    (Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • Wenhao Wang

    (Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • Linlin Du

    (Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • Guanyu Huang

    (Department of Environmental and Health Sciences, Spelman College, Atlanta, GA 30314, USA)

  • Caitlin McConaghy

    (Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • Stanley Fineman

    (Atlanta Allergy and Asthma Clinic, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Marietta, GA 30060, USA)

  • Yang Liu

    (Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

Abstract

Background: Seasonal pollen is a common cause of allergic respiratory disease. In the United States, pollen monitoring occurs via manual counting, a method which is both labor-intensive and has a considerable time delay. In this paper, we report the field-testing results of a new, automated, real-time pollen imaging sensor in Atlanta, GA. Methods: We first compared the pollen concentrations measured by an automated real-time pollen sensor (APS-300, Pollen Sense LLC) collocated with a Rotorod M40 sampler in 2020 at an allergy clinic in northwest Atlanta. An internal consistency assessment was then conducted with two collocated APS-300 sensors in downtown Atlanta during the 2021 pollen season. We also investigated the spatial heterogeneity of pollen concentrations using the APS-300 measurements. Results: Overall, the daily pollen concentrations reported by the APS-300 and the Rotorod M40 sampler with manual counting were strongly correlated (r = 0.85) during the peak pollen season. The APS-300 reported fewer tree pollen taxa, resulting in a slight underestimation of total pollen counts. Both the APS-300 and Rotorod M40 reported Quercus ( Oak ) and Pinus ( Pine ) as dominant pollen taxa during the peak tree pollen season. Pollen concentrations reported by APS-300 in the summer and fall were less accurate. The daily total and speciated pollen concentrations reported by two collocated APS-300 sensors were highly correlated (r = 0.93–0.99). Pollen concentrations showed substantial spatial and temporal heterogeneity in terms of peak levels at three locations in Atlanta. Conclusions: The APS-300 sensor was able to provide internally consistent, real-time pollen concentrations that are strongly correlated with the current gold-standard measurements during the peak pollen season. When compared with manual counting approaches, the fully automated sensor has the significant advantage of being mobile with the ability to provide real-time pollen data. However, the sensor’s weed and grass pollen identification algorithms require further improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenyang Jiang & Wenhao Wang & Linlin Du & Guanyu Huang & Caitlin McConaghy & Stanley Fineman & Yang Liu, 2022. "Field Evaluation of an Automated Pollen Sensor," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6444-:d:824270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6444/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6444/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Pilar Plaza & Franziska Kolek & Vivien Leier-Wirtz & Jens Otto Brunner & Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann & Athanasios Damialis, 2022. "Detecting Airborne Pollen Using an Automatic, Real-Time Monitoring System: Evidence from Two Sites," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Campana, P.E. & Lastanao, P. & Zainali, S. & Zhang, J. & Landelius, T. & Melton, F., 2022. "Towards an operational irrigation management system for Sweden with a water–food–energy nexus perspective," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6444-:d:824270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.