IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2021i1p145-d709688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time-Out with Young Children: A Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) Practitioner Review

Author

Listed:
  • Melanie J. Woodfield

    (The Werry Centre, Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
    Auckland District Health Board, Auckland 1023, New Zealand)

  • Irene Brodd

    (Centre for Children, Families and Communities, Department of Psychology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA)

  • Sarah E. Hetrick

    (The Werry Centre, Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
    Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia)

Abstract

Time-out is a component of many evidence-based parent training programmes for the treatment of childhood conduct problems. Existing comprehensive reviews suggest that time-out is both safe and effective when used predictably, infrequently, calmly and as one component of a collection of parenting strategies—i.e., when utilised in the manner advocated by most parent training programmes. However, this research evidence has been largely oriented towards the academic community and is often in conflict with the widespread misinformation about time-out within communities of parents, and within groups of treatment practitioners. This dissonance has the potential to undermine the dissemination and implementation of an effective suite of treatments for common and disabling childhood conditions. The parent-practitioner relationship is integral to the success of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT), an evidence-based treatment which involves live coaching of parent(s) with their young child(ren). Yet this relationship, and practitioner perspectives, attitudes and values as they relate to time-out, are often overlooked. This practitioner review explores the dynamics of the parent-practitioner relationship as they apply to the teaching and coaching of time-out to parents. It also acknowledges factors within the clinical setting that impact on time-out’s use, such as the views of administrators and professional colleagues. The paper is oriented toward practitioners of PCIT but is of relevance to all providers of parent training interventions for young children.

Suggested Citation

  • Melanie J. Woodfield & Irene Brodd & Sarah E. Hetrick, 2021. "Time-Out with Young Children: A Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) Practitioner Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:145-:d:709688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/145/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/145/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Woodfield, M.J. & Cargo, T. & Barnett, D. & Lambie, I., 2020. "Understanding New Zealand therapist experiences of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) training and implementation, and how these compare internationally," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melanie J. Woodfield & Tania Cargo & Sally N. Merry & Sarah E. Hetrick, 2021. "Barriers to Clinician Implementation of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) in New Zealand and Australia: What Role for Time-Out?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:145-:d:709688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.