IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i5p2478-d509393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Possible Role for Imagery-Based Therapy in Managing PTSD in Pakistani Women Experiencing Domestic Abuse: A Pilot Study Using Eidetic Therapy

Author

Listed:
  • Mehwish Kamran Ehsan

    (Department of Professional Psychology, Bahria University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • David L. Rowland

    (Department of Psychology, Valparaiso University, Valparaiso, IN 46383, USA)

Abstract

Domestic abuse of women is a serious problem worldwide that has economic, physical, and psychological consequences, yet in many countries and cultures, victims often have little access to psychological support. Using a pre-post design, we investigated the effects of psychological intervention using an imagery-based therapy in women showing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) resulting from spousal domestic abuse. Forty women, referred from outpatient clinics in Pakistan and meeting inclusion criteria, underwent individual trauma counseling for 10–12 weeks using the principles of Eidetic Therapy, an imagery-based therapy that circumvents heavy reliance on verbal skills and narratives. Women showed significant reductions in PTSD by the end of treatment. Predictors of treatment gains included type of abuse, PTSD level at the outset of therapy, and years in the relationship. Neither economic resources or literacy, nor abuser or victim characteristics, predicted the amount of improvement. In conclusion, therapy was associated with a reduction in PTSD symptoms regardless of literacy level of participants. This reduction in PTSD was notable because, unlike many situations involving spousal abuse, these women were generally not in a position to leave their relationship, and hence the women might have experienced continued exposure to abuse. Context/cultural-based explanations for these findings are presented and discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehwish Kamran Ehsan & David L. Rowland, 2021. "Possible Role for Imagery-Based Therapy in Managing PTSD in Pakistani Women Experiencing Domestic Abuse: A Pilot Study Using Eidetic Therapy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:5:p:2478-:d:509393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2478/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2478/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haroon Jamal & Amir Jahan Khan, 2005. "The Knowledge Divide: Education Inequality in Pakistan," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 83-104, Jan-Jun.
    2. Joseph Henrich & Steven J. Heine & Ara Norenzayan, 2010. "Most people are not WEIRD," Nature, Nature, vol. 466(7302), pages 29-29, July.
    3. Morrison, Andrew & Ellsberg, Mary & Bott, Sarah, 2004. "Addressing gender-based violence in the Latin American and Caribbean Region : A critical review of interventions," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3438, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John A. List, 2024. "Optimally generate policy-based evidence before scaling," Nature, Nature, vol. 626(7999), pages 491-499, February.
    2. Bouma, J.A. & Nguyen, Binh & van der Heijden, Eline & Dijk, J.J., 2018. "Analysing Group Contract Design Using a Lab and a Lab-in-the-Field Threshold Public Good Experiment," Discussion Paper 2018-049, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    3. Sahba Besharati & Rufus Akinyemi, 2023. "Accelerating African neuroscience to provide an equitable framework using perspectives from West and Southern Africa," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-4, December.
    4. Markussen, Thomas & Sharma, Smriti & Singhal, Saurabh & Tarp, Finn, 2021. "Inequality, institutions and cooperation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    5. Voigt, Stefan, 2022. "Determinant of Social Norms," ILE Working Paper Series 58, University of Hamburg, Institute of Law and Economics.
    6. repec:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:6:p:1392-1412 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Ahn, T.K. & Ostrom, Elinor & Walker, James, 2010. "A common-pool resource experiment with postgraduate subjects from 41 countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2624-2633, October.
    8. Ran Xu & Navid Ghaffarzadegan, 2018. "Neuroscience bridging scientific disciplines in health: Who builds the bridge, who pays for it?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 1183-1204, November.
    9. Cornand, Camille & Hubert, Paul, 2020. "On the external validity of experimental inflation forecasts: A comparison with five categories of field expectations," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    10. Andrea Bizzego & Mengyu Lim & Greta Schiavon & Gianluca Esposito, 2020. "Children with Developmental Disabilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: More Neglected and Physically Punished," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Michael Muthukrishna & Joseph Henrich & Wataru Toyokawa & Takeshi Hamamura & Tatsuya Kameda & Steven J Heine, 2018. "Overconfidence is universal? Elicitation of Genuine Overconfidence (EGO) procedure reveals systematic differences across domain, task knowledge, and incentives in four populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-30, August.
    12. Rocío Ribero & Fabio Sánchez, 2004. "Determinantes, Efectos Y Costos De La Violencia Intrafamiliar En Colombia," Documentos CEDE 2331, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    13. James Derbyshire & Mandeep Dhami & Ian Belton & Dilek Önkal, 2023. "The value of experiments in futures and foresight science as illustrated by the case of scenario planning," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), June.
    14. Monic Sun & Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang & Feng Zhu, 2012. "To Belong or to Be Different? Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment in China," Working Papers 12-15, NET Institute, revised Oct 2012.
    15. Ingo S. Seifert & Julia M. Rohrer & Boris Egloff & Stefan C. Schmukle, 2021. "The Development of the Rank-Order Stability of the Big Five across the Life Span," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1156, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    16. Sara Miñarro & Victoria Reyes-García & Shankar Aswani & Samiya Selim & Christopher P Barrington-Leigh & Eric D Galbraith, 2021. "Happy without money: Minimally monetized societies can exhibit high subjective well-being," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, January.
    17. Bria Long & Judith E. Fan & Holly Huey & Zixian Chai & Michael C. Frank, 2024. "Parallel developmental changes in children’s production and recognition of line drawings of visual concepts," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Ahmed, Sofia, 2011. "Does economic geography matter for Pakistan? a spatial exploratory analysis of income and education inequalities," MPRA Paper 35062, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Manpreet Blessin & Sophie Lehmann & Angela M. Kunzler & Rolf van Dick & Klaus Lieb, 2022. "Resilience Interventions Conducted in Western and Eastern Countries—A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-25, June.
    20. Shawn Grover & John F. Helliwell, 2019. "How’s Life at Home? New Evidence on Marriage and the Set Point for Happiness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 373-390, February.
    21. Cristian Badarinza & John Y. Campbell & Tarun Ramadorai, 2016. "International Comparative Household Finance," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 8(1), pages 111-144, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:5:p:2478-:d:509393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.