IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i3p1265-d490373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subcritical Transmission in the Early Stage of COVID-19 in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Yong Sul Won

    (National Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 70, Yuseong-daero 1689 beon-gil, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34047, Korea
    These authors contributed equally.)

  • Jong-Hoon Kim

    (International Vaccine Institute, SNU Research Park, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea
    These authors contributed equally.)

  • Chi Young Ahn

    (National Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 70, Yuseong-daero 1689 beon-gil, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34047, Korea)

  • Hyojung Lee

    (National Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 70, Yuseong-daero 1689 beon-gil, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34047, Korea)

Abstract

While the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has been ongoing in Korea since January 2020, there were limited transmissions during the early stages of the outbreak. In the present study, we aimed to provide a statistical characterization of COVID-19 transmissions that led to this small outbreak. We collated the individual data of the first 28 confirmed cases reported from 20 January to 10 February 2020. We estimated key epidemiological parameters such as reporting delay (i.e., time from symptom onset to confirmation), incubation period, and serial interval by fitting probability distributions to the data based on the maximum likelihood estimation. We also estimated the basic reproduction number ( R 0 ) using the renewal equation, which allows for the transmissibility to differ between imported and locally transmitted cases. There were 16 imported and 12 locally transmitted cases, and secondary transmissions per case were higher for the imported cases than the locally transmitted cases (nine vs. three cases). The mean reporting delays were estimated to be 6.76 days (95% CI: 4.53, 9.28) and 2.57 days (95% CI: 1.57, 4.23) for imported and locally transmitted cases, respectively. The mean incubation period was estimated to be 5.53 days (95% CI: 3.98, 8.09) and was shorter than the mean serial interval of 6.45 days (95% CI: 4.32, 9.65). The R 0 was estimated to be 0.40 (95% CI: 0.16, 0.99), accounting for the local and imported cases. The fewer secondary cases and shorter reporting delays for the locally transmitted cases suggest that contact tracing of imported cases was effective at reducing further transmissions, which helped to keep R 0 below one and the overall transmissions small.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong Sul Won & Jong-Hoon Kim & Chi Young Ahn & Hyojung Lee, 2021. "Subcritical Transmission in the Early Stage of COVID-19 in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-10, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1265-:d:490373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1265/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1265/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. O. Lloyd-Smith & S. J. Schreiber & P. E. Kopp & W. M. Getz, 2005. "Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence," Nature, Nature, vol. 438(7066), pages 355-359, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tardy, Olivia & Lenglos, Christophe & Lai, Sandra & Berteaux, Dominique & Leighton, Patrick A., 2023. "Rabies transmission in the Arctic: An agent-based model reveals the effects of broad-scale movement strategies on contact risk between Arctic foxes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    2. Wei Zhong, 2017. "Simulating influenza pandemic dynamics with public risk communication and individual responsive behavior," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 475-495, December.
    3. Moshe B Hoshen & Anthony H Burton & Themis J V Bowcock, 2007. "Simulating disease transmission dynamics at a multi-scale level," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 1(1), pages 26-34.
    4. Luc E. Coffeng & Sake J. de Vlas, 2022. "Predicting epidemics and the impact of interventions in heterogeneous settings: Standard SEIR models are too pessimistic," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(S1), pages 28-35, November.
    5. Joseph B. Bak-Coleman & Ian Kennedy & Morgan Wack & Andrew Beers & Joseph S. Schafer & Emma S. Spiro & Kate Starbird & Jevin D. West, 2022. "Combining interventions to reduce the spread of viral misinformation," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(10), pages 1372-1380, October.
    6. Kris V. Parag & Robin N. Thompson & Christl A. Donnelly, 2022. "Are epidemic growth rates more informative than reproduction numbers?," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(S1), pages 5-15, November.
    7. Thomas Ash & Antonio M. Bento & Daniel Kaffine & Akhil Rao & Ana I. Bento, 2022. "Disease-economy trade-offs under alternative epidemic control strategies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Maarten Jan Wensink & Linda Juel Ahrenfeldt & Sören Möller, 2020. "Variability Matters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-8, December.
    9. Lingcai Kong & Jinfeng Wang & Weiguo Han & Zhidong Cao, 2016. "Modeling Heterogeneity in Direct Infectious Disease Transmission in a Compartmental Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, February.
    10. Carolyn Ingram & Vicky Downey & Mark Roe & Yanbing Chen & Mary Archibald & Kadri-Ann Kallas & Jaspal Kumar & Peter Naughton & Cyril Onwuelazu Uteh & Alejandro Rojas-Chaves & Shibu Shrestha & Shiraz Sy, 2021. "COVID-19 Prevention and Control Measures in Workplace Settings: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-26, July.
    11. Wayne M. Getz & Jean-Paul Gonzalez & Richard Salter & James Bangura & Colin Carlson & Moinya Coomber & Eric Dougherty & David Kargbo & Nathan D. Wolfe & Nadia Wauquier, 2015. "Tactics and Strategies for Managing Ebola Outbreaks and the Salience of Immunization," Post-Print hal-01214432, HAL.
    12. Robin N Thompson & Christopher A Gilligan & Nik J Cunniffe, 2016. "Detecting Presymptomatic Infection Is Necessary to Forecast Major Epidemics in the Earliest Stages of Infectious Disease Outbreaks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Kathrin Büttner & Joachim Krieter & Arne Traulsen & Imke Traulsen, 2013. "Efficient Interruption of Infection Chains by Targeted Removal of Central Holdings in an Animal Trade Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-12, September.
    14. Ellen Brooks-Pollock & Leon Danon & Hester Korthals Altes & Jennifer A Davidson & Andrew M T Pollock & Dick van Soolingen & Colin Campbell & Maeve K Lalor, 2020. "A model of tuberculosis clustering in low incidence countries reveals more transmission in the United Kingdom than the Netherlands between 2010 and 2015," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Jonas I Liechti & Gabriel E Leventhal & Sebastian Bonhoeffer, 2017. "Host population structure impedes reversion to drug sensitivity after discontinuation of treatment," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, August.
    16. T Alex Perkins & Thomas W Scott & Arnaud Le Menach & David L Smith, 2013. "Heterogeneity, Mixing, and the Spatial Scales of Mosquito-Borne Pathogen Transmission," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Otilia Boldea & Adriana Cornea-Madeira & João Madeira, 2023. "Disentangling the effect of measures, variants, and vaccines on SARS-CoV-2 infections in England: a dynamic intensity model," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 26(3), pages 444-466.
    18. Mark D Jankowski & Christopher J Williams & Jeanne M Fair & Jennifer C Owen, 2013. "Birds Shed RNA-Viruses According to the Pareto Principle," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-9, August.
    19. Nathan O. Hodas & Jacob Hunter & Stephen J. Young & Kristina Lerman, 2018. "Model of cognitive dynamics predicts performance on standardized tests," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 295-312, September.
    20. Yunhwan Kim & Hohyung Ryu & Sunmi Lee, 2018. "Agent-Based Modeling for Super-Spreading Events: A Case Study of MERS-CoV Transmission Dynamics in the Republic of Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1265-:d:490373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.