IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11585-d671990.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Intake: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Valli

    (Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Preventive Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
    Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute San Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Marilina Santero

    (Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Preventive Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
    Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute San Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Anna Prokop-Dorner

    (Department of Medical Sociology, Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-034 Krakow, Poland)

  • Victoria Howatt

    (Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
    Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada)

  • Bradley C. Johnston

    (Department Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
    Department of Nutrition, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Joanna Zajac

    (Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Chair Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-034 Krakow, Poland)

  • Mi-Ah Han

    (College of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Korea)

  • Ana Pereira

    (Servicio Madrileño de Salud (SERMAS), 28008 Madrid, Spain
    Sociedad Madrileña de Medicina de Familia Comunitaria (SoMaMFyC), 28004 Madrid, Spain)

  • Fernando Kenji Nampo

    (Evidence-Based Public Health Research Group, Latin-American Institute of Life and Nature Sciences, Federal University of Latin-American Integration, Foz do Iguassu 85866-000, PR, Brazil)

  • Gordon H. Guyatt

    (Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada)

  • Malgorzata M. Bala

    (Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Chair Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-034 Krakow, Poland)

  • Pablo Alonso-Coello

    (Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute San Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
    CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain)

  • Montserrat Rabassa

    (Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute San Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

Background. In addition to social and environmental determinants, people’s values and preferences determine daily food choices. This study evaluated adults’ values and preferences regarding unprocessed red meat (URM) and processed meat (PM) and their willingness to change their consumption in the face of possible undesirable health consequences. Methods. A cross-sectional mixed-methods study including a quantitative assessment through an online survey, a qualitative inquiry through semi-structured interviews, and a follow-up assessment through a telephone survey. We performed descriptive statistics, logistic regressions, and thematic analysis. Results. Of 304 participants, over 75% were unwilling to stop their consumption of either URM or PM, and of those unwilling to stop, over 80% were also unwilling to reduce. Men were less likely to stop meat intake than women (odds ratios < 0.4). From the semi-structured interviews, we identified three main themes: the social and/or family context of meat consumption, health- and non-health-related concerns about meat, and uncertainty of the evidence. At three months, 63% of participants reported no changes in meat intake. Conclusions. When informed about the cancer incidence and mortality risks of meat consumption, most respondents would not reduce their intake. Public health and clinical nutrition guidelines should ensure that their recommendations are consistent with population values and preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Valli & Marilina Santero & Anna Prokop-Dorner & Victoria Howatt & Bradley C. Johnston & Joanna Zajac & Mi-Ah Han & Ana Pereira & Fernando Kenji Nampo & Gordon H. Guyatt & Malgorzata M. Bala & , 2021. "Health Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Intake: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11585-:d:671990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11585/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11585/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. F Marijn Stok & Stefan Hoffmann & Dorothee Volkert & Heiner Boeing & Regina Ensenauer & Marta Stelmach-Mardas & Eva Kiesswetter & Alisa Weber & Harald Rohm & Nanna Lien & Johannes Brug & Michelle Hold, 2017. "The DONE framework: Creation, evaluation, and updating of an interdisciplinary, dynamic framework 2.0 of determinants of nutrition and eating," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Ruben Sanchez-Sabate & Joan Sabaté, 2019. "Consumer Attitudes Towards Environmental Concerns of Meat Consumption: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-37, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. F. Xavier Medina & Francesc Fusté-Forné & Nela Filimon, 2023. "Public Awareness of Food Products, Preferences and Practices: Old Challenges and New Insights," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-3, May.
    2. Katarzyna Mazur-Włodarczyk & Agnieszka Gruszecka-Kosowska, 2022. "Sustainable or Not? Insights on the Consumption of Animal Products in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-23, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Irina Chernukha & Elena Kotenkova & Svetlana Derbeneva & Daniil Khvostov, 2021. "Bioactive Compounds of Porcine Hearts and Aortas May Improve Cardiovascular Disorders in Humans," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Hernando Barreto Riaño & John Willmer Escobar & Rodrigo Linfati & Virna Ortiz-Araya, 2022. "Disciplinary Categorization of the Cattle Supply Chain—A Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-44, November.
    3. Youngdeok Lee & Kittichai Watchravesringkan, 2022. "How to Promote Eco-Apparel? Effects of Eco-Labels and Message Framing," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(2), pages 1-69, December.
    4. Ewa Halicka & Joanna Kaczorowska & Krystyna Rejman & Agata Szczebyło, 2021. "Parental Food Choices and Engagement in Raising Children’s Awareness of Sustainable Behaviors in Urban Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Yingjie Lai & Chaemoon Yoo & Xiaomin Zhou & Younghwan Pan, 2023. "Elements of Food Service Design for Low-Carbon Tourism-Based on Dine-In Tourist Behavior and Attitudes in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Jörg Rieger & Florian Freund & Frank Offermann & Inna Geibel & Alexander Gocht, 2023. "From fork to farm: Impacts of more sustainable diets in the EU‐27 on the agricultural sector," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(3), pages 764-784, September.
    7. Paul Schulz & Susanne Nicolai & Samuel Tomczyk & Silke Schmidt & Philipp Franikowski & Susanne Stoll-Kleemann, 2024. "Gender and Socioeconomic Influences on Ten Pro-Environmental Behavior Intentions: A German Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Bianca Blum & Bernhard K. J. Neumärker, 2021. "Lessons from Globalization and the COVID-19 Pandemic for Economic, Environmental and Social Policy," World, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-26, June.
    9. Hayley Butcher & Sarah Burkhart & Nicholas Paul & Ulusapeti Tiitii & Karibanang Tamuera & Taati Eria & Libby Swanepoel, 2020. "Role of Seaweed in Diets of Samoa and Kiribati: Exploring Key Motivators for Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-13, September.
    10. Gabriela O. Chiciudean & Rezhen Harun & Iulia C. Muresan & Felix H. Arion & Daniel I. Chiciudean & Garofita L. Ilies & Diana E. Dumitras, 2019. "Assessing the Importance of Health in Choosing a Restaurant: An Empirical Study from Romania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Rakhshan Ummar & Kanwal Shaheen & Iram Bashir & Junaid Ul Haq & Mark A. Bonn, 2023. "Green Social Media Campaigns: Influencing Consumers’ Attitudes and Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Carlsson, Fredrik & Kataria, Mitesh & Lampi, Elina, 2022. "Sustainable food: Can information from food labels make consumers switch to meat substitutes?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    13. Dominika Skolmowska & Dominika Głąbska, 2022. "Effectiveness of Dietary Intervention with Iron and Vitamin C Administered Separately in Improving Iron Status in Young Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Muddassar Sarfraz & Ilhan Ozturk & Sunghoon Yoo & Muhammad Ali Raza & Heesup Han, 2023. "Toward a new understanding of environmental and financial performance through corporate social responsibility, green innovation, and sustainable development," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Cuny, Caroline & Petit, Cécile & Allain, Gaël, 2021. "Capturing implicit texture–flavour associations to predict consumers’ new product preferences," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    16. Samson Yaekob Assele & Michel Meulders & Helena Michiels & Nanou Flamant & Martina Vandebroek, 2023. "The Effect of Information Provision and Color Coding in Product Labeling on the Preference for Meat Substitutes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Alice Wistar & Marissa G. Hall & Maxime Bercholz & Lindsey Smith Taillie, 2022. "Designing Environmental Messages to Discourage Red Meat Consumption: An Online Experiment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-14, March.
    18. Kennedy Ndue & Goda Pál, 2022. "European Green Transition Implications on Africa’s Livestock Sector Development and Resilience to Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-29, November.
    19. Cathy Macharis & Dorit Kerret, 2019. "The 5E Model of Environmental Engagement: Bringing Sustainability Change to Higher Education through Positive Psychology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, January.
    20. Alina Zaharia & Maria-Claudia Diaconeasa & Natalia Maehle & Gergely Szolnoki & Roberta Capitello, 2021. "Developing Sustainable Food Systems in Europe: National Policies and Stakeholder Perspectives in a Four-Country Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-40, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11585-:d:671990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.