IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11416-d668541.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying a Complex Integrated Method for Mapping and Assessment of the Degraded Ecosystem Hotspots from Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Sorin Avram

    (National Institute for Economic Research “Costin C. Kiriţescu” (INCE), Romanian Academy, 13 September Street No. 13, 050711 Bucharest, Romania
    Department of Geography, University of Craiova, Al. I. Cuza Street No. 13, 200585 Craiova, Romania)

  • Irina Ontel

    (Remote Sensing and Satellite Meteorology Laboratory, National Meteorological Administration, 013686 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Carmen Gheorghe

    (National Institute for Economic Research “Costin C. Kiriţescu” (INCE), Romanian Academy, 13 September Street No. 13, 050711 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Steliana Rodino

    (National Institute of Research and Development for Biological Sciences, Spl. Independentei No. 296, 060031 Bucharest, Romania
    Institute of Research for Agriculture Economy and Rural Development, Bd. Marasti No. 61, 011464 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Sanda Roșca

    (Faculty of Geography, Babes-Bolyai University, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

To meet the global challenges of climate change and human activity pressure on biodiversity conservation, it has become vital to map such pressure hotspots. Large areas, such as nation-wide regions, are difficult to map from the point of view of the resources needed for such mapping (human resources, hard and soft resources). European biodiversity policies have focused on restoring degraded ecosystems by at least 10% by 2020, and new policies aim to restore up to 30% of degraded ecosystems by 2030. In this study, methods developed and applied for the assessment of the degradation state of the ecosystems in a semi-automatic manner for the entire Romanian territory (238,391 km 2 ) are presented. The following ecosystems were analyzed: forestry, grassland, rivers, lakes, caves and coastal areas. The information and data covering all the ecoregions of the Romania (~110,000 km 2 ) were analyzed and processed, based on GIS and remote sensing techniques. The largest degraded areas were identified within the coastal area (49.80%), grassland ecosystems (38.59%) and the cave ecosystems (2.66%), while 27.64% of rivers ecosystems were degraded, followed by 8.52% of forest ecosystems, and 14.05% of lakes ecosystems. This analysis can contribute to better definition of the locations of the most affected areas, which will yield a useful spatial representation for future ecological reconstruction strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Sorin Avram & Irina Ontel & Carmen Gheorghe & Steliana Rodino & Sanda Roșca, 2021. "Applying a Complex Integrated Method for Mapping and Assessment of the Degraded Ecosystem Hotspots from Romania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-23, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11416-:d:668541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11416/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11416/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sorin Avram & Corina Cipu & Ana-Maria Corpade & Carmen Adriana Gheorghe & Nicolae Manta & Mihaita-Iulian Niculae & Ionuţ Silviu Pascu & Róbert Eugen Szép & Steliana Rodino, 2021. "GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Analysis Method for Assessment of Lake Ecosystems Degradation—Case Study in Romania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Silviu Constantin & Ionuț Cornel Mirea & Alexandru Petculescu & Răzvan Adrian Arghir & Dragoș Ștefan Măntoiu & Marius Kenesz & Marius Robu & Oana Teodora Moldovan, 2021. "Monitoring Human Impact in Show Caves. A Study of Four Romanian Caves," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    3. Žiga Malek & Veronica Zumpano & Haydar Hussin, 2018. "Forest management and future changes to ecosystem services in the Romanian Carpathians," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1275-1291, June.
    4. Levente Papp & Boudewijn van Leeuwen & Péter Szilassi & Zalán Tobak & József Szatmári & Mátyás Árvai & János Mészáros & László Pásztor, 2021. "Monitoring Invasive Plant Species Using Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Cornelius Senf & Rupert Seidl, 2021. "Mapping the forest disturbance regimes of Europe," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 63-70, January.
    6. Sanda Roșca & Vasile Șimonca & Ștefan Bilașco & Iuliu Vescan & Ioan Fodorean & Dănuț Petrea, 2019. "The Assessment of Favourability and Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Pinus Mugo in the Romanian Carpathians Using GIS Technology and Landsat Images," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-30, July.
    7. Viorel D Popescu & Laurentiu Rozylowicz & Iulian M Niculae & Adina L Cucu & Tibor Hartel, 2014. "Species, Habitats, Society: An Evaluation of Research Supporting EU's Natura 2000 Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-22, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonio Santoro & Martina Venturi & Francesco Piras & Beatrice Fiore & Federica Corrieri & Mauro Agnoletti, 2021. "Forest Area Changes in Cinque Terre National Park in the Last 80 Years. Consequences on Landslides and Forest Fire Risks," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Aleksandra Kosanic & Karsten Lambers & Stamatia Galata & Katja Kothieringer & Angelika Abderhalden, 2023. "Importance of Cultural Ecosystem Services for Cultural Identity and Wellbeing in the Lower Engadine, Switzerland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Nicolás Ruiz, Néstor & Suárez Alonso, María Luisa & Vidal-Abarca, María Rosario, 2021. "Contributions of dry rivers to human well-being: A global review for future research," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    4. Pettenella, Davide & Thiene, Mara & Scarpa, Riccardo & Masiero, Mauro & Mattea, Stefania & Franceschinis, Cristiano, 2016. "First economic assessment of ecosystem services from Natura 2000 network in Lombardy (Northern Italy)," 2016 Fifth AIEAA Congress, June 16-17, 2016, Bologna, Italy 242326, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    5. Thomas Campagnaro & Giovanni Trentanovi & Tommaso Sitzia, 2018. "Identifying Habitat Type Conservation Priorities under the Habitats Directive: Application to Two Italian Biogeographical Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Joachim Maes & Adrián G. Bruzón & José I. Barredo & Sara Vallecillo & Peter Vogt & Inés Marí Rivero & Fernando Santos-Martín, 2023. "Accounting for forest condition in Europe based on an international statistical standard," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Bacău, Simona & Grădinaru, Simona R. & Hersperger, Anna M., 2020. "Spatial plans as relational data: Using social network analysis to assess consistency among Bucharest’s planning instruments," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Marta Lisiak-Zielińska & Arlinda Cakaj & Anna Budka & Maria Drapikowska & Klaudia Borowiak & Jolanta Kanclerz & Ewelina Janicka, 2021. "Natura 2000 Network vs. Tourism and Investment Potential of Communes—A Case Study of Czarnkowsko-Trzcianecki County," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Zefeng Chen & Weiguang Wang & Giovanni Forzieri & Alessandro Cescatti, 2024. "Transition from positive to negative indirect CO2 effects on the vegetation carbon uptake," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Per Angelstam & Michael Manton, 2021. "Effects of Forestry Intensification and Conservation on Green Infrastructures: A Spatio-Temporal Evaluation in Sweden," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-29, May.
    11. Fuchs, Jasper M. & v. Bodelschwingh, Hilmar & Lange, Alexander & Paul, Carola & Husmann, Kai, 2022. "Quantifying the consequences of disturbances on wood revenues with Impulse Response Functions," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    12. Alina Elena Ionașcu & Shankha Shubhra Goswami & Alexandra Dănilă & Maria-Gabriela Horga & Corina Aurora Barbu & Adrian Şerban-Comǎnescu, 2024. "Analyzing Primary Sector Selection for Economic Activity in Romania: An Interval-Valued Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-38, April.
    13. Rosangela Addesso & Stefano Pingaro & Bruno Bisceglia & Daniela Baldantoni, 2022. "Sustainable Tourism and Conservation of Underground Ecosystems through Airflow and Particle Distribution Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-10, June.
    14. Yuanhuan Zheng & Chunxue Yu & Huabin Zhou & Jiannan Xiao, 2021. "Spatial Variations and Influencing Factors of River Networks in River Basins of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-14, November.
    15. Anna Maria Kowalczyk & Szymon Czyża, 2022. "Optimising Photovoltaic Farm Location Using a Capabilities Matrix and GIS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-32, September.
    16. Jacqueline Loos & Tibor-Csaba Vizauer & Agnes Kastal & Martin Davies & Hans Hedrich & Matthias Dolek, 2020. "A highly endangered species on the edge: distribution, habitat use and outlook for Colias myrmidone in newly established Natura 2000 areas in Romania," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2399-2414, March.
    17. Ashebir Woldeyohannes & Marc Cotter & Wubneshe Dessalegn Biru & Girma Kelboro, 2020. "Assessing Changes in Ecosystem Service Values over 1985–2050 in Response to Land Use and Land Cover Dynamics in Abaya-Chamo Basin, Southern Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-22, January.
    18. Márton Bence Balogh & Miklós Kertész & Katalin Török & Georgina Veronika Visztra & Péter Szilassi, 2023. "Changes in the Occurrence of Five Invasive Plant Species in Different Ecosystem Types between 2009–2018 in Hungary," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, September.
    19. Buda Baji'c & Sr{dj}an Mili'cevi'c & Aleksandar Anti'c & Slobodan Markovi'c & Nemanja Tomi'c, 2024. "Neural Network Modeling for Forecasting Tourism Demand in Stopi\'{c}a Cave: A Serbian Cave Tourism Study," Papers 2404.04974, arXiv.org.
    20. Shackleton, Ross T. & Angelstam, Per & van der Waal, Benjamin & Elbakidze, Marine, 2017. "Progress made in managing and valuing ecosystem services: a horizon scan of gaps in research, management and governance," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PB), pages 232-241.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11416-:d:668541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.