IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i17p9250-d627439.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making Lived-Experience Research Accessible: A Design Thinking Approach to Co-Creating Knowledge Translation Resources Based on Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine M. Boydell

    (Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW 2034, Australia
    School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2034, Australia)

  • Anne Honey

    (School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia)

  • Helen Glover

    (Enlightened Consultants, Redland Bay, QLD 4165, Australia)

  • Katherine Gill

    (Consumer-Led Research Network, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia)

  • Barbara Tooth

    (The Mental Health Services (TheMHS) Network, Balmain, NSW 2000, Australia)

  • Francesca Coniglio

    (Private Practitioner, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia)

  • Monique Hines

    (School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia)

  • Leonie Dunn

    (South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia)

  • Justin Newton Scanlan

    (School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia)

Abstract

Mental health lived-experience research illuminates the perspectives and experiences of people who live with mental illness. However, little is known about how useful people with lived experience of mental illness/distress might find lived-experience research, nor what the best formats are to bring it to their attention. This paper describes the STELLER study (Supporting the Translation into Everyday Life of Lived-Experience Research), which explores the translation of lived-experience research in the lives of people living with mental illness. Our aim was to use a design thinking approach to develop a range of user-friendly formats to disseminate lived-experience research. A staged design thinking approach was used to develop a translation strategy for lived-experience research. We explored empathy via consumer consultation to understand their perspectives on lived-experience research, refined the design aim, research questions and generated ideas with consumers and mental health professionals, identified the evidence based on lived experience-authored journal articles, worked with design students and peer workers to create a suite of resources and developed prototypes tailored to individual settings and clients. Participatory design thinking strategies are essential to identify the best ways to translate evidence-based lived-experience research via accessible, lay-friendly resources targeted to individuals impacted by mental illness. This study is the first to investigate the feasibility and usefulness of bringing the findings of lived-experience research to individuals impacted by mental illness/distress. It provides evidence about a potentially important source of information that can be used to facilitate their recovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine M. Boydell & Anne Honey & Helen Glover & Katherine Gill & Barbara Tooth & Francesca Coniglio & Monique Hines & Leonie Dunn & Justin Newton Scanlan, 2021. "Making Lived-Experience Research Accessible: A Design Thinking Approach to Co-Creating Knowledge Translation Resources Based on Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-9, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:9250-:d:627439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/9250/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/9250/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shannon Li & Anne Honey & Francesca Coniglio & Peter Schaecken, 2022. "Mental Health Peer Worker Perspectives on Resources Developed from Lived Experience Research Findings: A Delphi Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Min-Hua Chen & Shih-Ping Cheng & Leon Yufeng Wu, 2023. "Merging Design Thinking into Translational Research in a Biomedical Engineering Laboratory (DT-TRBEL) Course," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-13, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:9250-:d:627439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.