IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i16p8583-d614316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation, Mechanisms and Context of the MAMAACT Intervention to Reduce Ethnic and Social Disparity in Stillbirth and Infant Health

Author

Listed:
  • Trine Damsted Rasmussen

    (Section of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, P.O. Box 2099, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Helle Johnsen

    (Department of Midwifery and Therapeutic Sciences, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Signe Smith Jervelund

    (Section for Health Services Research, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, P.O. Box 2099, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Ulla Christensen

    (Section of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, P.O. Box 2099, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen

    (Section of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, P.O. Box 2099, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Sarah Fredsted Villadsen

    (Section of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, P.O. Box 2099, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark)

Abstract

The MAMAACT intervention aimed to address ethnic and social disparity in stillbirth and infant health by improving management of pregnancy complications. This process evaluation of the intervention was guided by the British Medical Research Council’s framework. We examined implementation through dose, reach, and fidelity, important mechanisms and the influence of contextual factors. The intervention included a six-hour training session for antenatal care (ANC) midwives in intercultural communication and cultural competence, two follow-up dialogue meetings, and health education materials (leaflet and app) on warning signs of severe pregnancy complications and how to respond for pregnant women. A mixed-methods approach was applied. Cross-sectional survey data and administrative data were used to assess intervention reach and dose. Qualitative data (records from dialogue meetings with midwives, participant observations and field notes from ANC visits, focus group interviews with midwives, and individual interviews with non-Western immigrant women) evaluated intervention fidelity, mechanisms, and contextual barriers. More than 80% of women received the MAMAACT leaflet and many found the content useful. The app was used more selectively. Midwives described being more aware and reflective in their communication with women from various cultural backgrounds. Organizational factors in ANC (time pressure, lack of flexibility in visits, poor interpreter services), barriers in women’s everyday life (lack of social network, previous negative experiences/lack of trust and domestic responsibilities), and habitual interaction patterns among midwives served as contextual barriers. The reach of the intervention was high and it was evaluated positively by both pregnant women and midwives. Organizational factors hindered changes towards more needs-based communication in ANC potentially hindering the intended mechanisms of the intervention. When interpreting the intervention effects, attention should be drawn to both organizational and interpersonal factors in the clinic as well as the pregnant women’s life situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Trine Damsted Rasmussen & Helle Johnsen & Signe Smith Jervelund & Ulla Christensen & Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen & Sarah Fredsted Villadsen, 2021. "Implementation, Mechanisms and Context of the MAMAACT Intervention to Reduce Ethnic and Social Disparity in Stillbirth and Infant Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8583-:d:614316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8583/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8583/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farah Nawabi & Franziska Krebs & Vera Vennedey & Arim Shukri & Laura Lorenz & Stephanie Stock, 2021. "Health Literacy in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Dubbin, Leslie A. & Chang, Jamie Suki & Shim, Janet K., 2013. "Cultural health capital and the interactional dynamics of patient-centered care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 113-120.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Outram, SM & Brown, JEH & Ackerman, SL, 2022. "The social value of genomic sequencing for disadvantaged families facing rare disease," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    2. Manzer, Jamie L. & Bell, Ann V., 2022. "The limitations of patient-centered care: The case of early long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) removal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    3. Silva, Jennifer M. & Durden, T. Elizabeth & Hirsch, Annemarie, 2023. "Erasing inequality: Examining discrepancies between electronic health records and patient narratives to uncover perceived stigma and dismissal in clinical encounters," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    4. Fenton, Anny T. & Elliott, Marc N. & Schwebel, David C. & Berkowitz, Zahava & Liddon, Nicole C. & Tortolero, Susan R. & Cuccaro, Paula M. & Davies, Suzy L. & Schuster, Mark A., 2018. "Unequal interactions: Examining the role of patient-centered care in reducing inequitable diffusion of a medical innovation, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 238-248.
    5. Angela Odero & Manon Pongy & Louis Chauvel & Bernard Voz & Elisabeth Spitz & Benoit Pétré & Michèle Baumann, 2020. "Core Values that Influence the Patient—Healthcare Professional Power Dynamic: Steering Interaction towards Partnership," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Julia von Sommoggy & Eva-Maria Grepmeier & Janina Curbach, 2022. "Health Literacy-Sensitive Counselling on Early Childhood Allergy Prevention: Results of a Qualitative Study on German Midwives’ Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Gage-Bouchard, Elizabeth A., 2017. "Social support, flexible resources, and health care navigation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 111-118.
    8. Diamond-Brown, Lauren, 2018. "“It can be challenging, it can be scary, it can be gratifying”: Obstetricians’ narratives of negotiating patient choice, clinical experience, and standards of care in decision-making," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 48-54.
    9. McLemore, Monica R. & Altman, Molly R. & Cooper, Norlissa & Williams, Shanell & Rand, Larry & Franck, Linda, 2018. "Health care experiences of pregnant, birthing and postnatal women of color at risk for preterm birth," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 127-135.
    10. Asad, Asad L. & Kay, Tamara, 2015. "Toward a multidimensional understanding of culture for health interventions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 79-87.
    11. Maiken Meldgaard & Rikke Damkjær Maimburg & Maiken Fabricius Damm & Anna Aaby & Anna Peeters & Helle Terkildsen Maindal, 2022. "The Health Literacy in Pregnancy (HeLP) Program Study Protocol: Development of an Antenatal Care Intervention Using the Ophelia Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-13, April.
    12. Louie, Patricia & Wilkes, Rima, 2018. "Representations of race and skin tone in medical textbook imagery," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 38-42.
    13. Farah Nawabi & Franziska Krebs & Laura Lorenz & Arim Shukri & Adrienne Alayli & Stephanie Stock, 2022. "Health Literacy among Pregnant Women in a Lifestyle Intervention Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-10, May.
    14. Fleming, Mark D. & Shim, Janet K. & Yen, Irene H. & Thompson-Lastad, Ariana & Rubin, Sara & Van Natta, Meredith & Burke, Nancy J., 2017. "Patient engagement at the margins: Health care providers' assessments of engagement and the structural determinants of health in the safety-net," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 11-18.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8583-:d:614316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.