IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i16p8343-d609742.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Job Burnout among Safety Professionals: A Chinese Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Bing Wang

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
    Safety & Security Theory Innovation and Promotion Center, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
    Safety & Security Science and Emergency Management Center, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Yuanjie Wang

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
    Safety & Security Theory Innovation and Promotion Center, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
    Safety & Security Science and Emergency Management Center, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

As safety has been attracting the attention of all countries worldwide, the importance of safety professionals in safety management systems has been emphasized, which has consistently increased their workload. However, with the increase in work pressure, the income, social status, and social identity of safety professionals has not considerably improved, because of which the work motivation of safety professionals has reduced. Therefore, we aimed to identify the job burnout level (JBL) and its potential influencing factors among safety professionals in China. A total of 526 safety professionals from various industries participated. A univariate analysis of variance, independent sample t-test, bivariate correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis were employed to analyze the situation of job burnout. An overwhelming majority of the safety professionals (98.3%) who participated in the questionnaire exhibited varying degrees of job burnout. The numbers of respondents with higher than normal emotional exhaustion (EE), lack of personal accomplishment (LPA), and depersonalization (DP) levels were 68, 474, and 381, respectively, accounting for 12.9%, 90.1%, and 72.4% of the total respondents, respectively. When different demographic characteristics were reviewed, the job burnout levels considerably varied. For example, male safety professionals ( n = 434) exhibited higher levels of EE than female safety professionals ( n = 92) ( p = 0.025) because female safety professionals could release the dissatisfaction or stress they had encountered at work easily, but male safety professionals could not. Educational background had little effect on LPA ( p > 0.05) and EE ( p > 0.05), which indicated that job burnout was a general problem at all educational levels. The higher the age of respondents, the higher the level of LPA ( p < 0.001). In addition to individual factors, work-related factors also had an impact on job burnout. For instance, monthly income had an impact on EE ( p = 0.023) but had little impact on DP ( p > 0.05). Furthermore, social, organizational, professional, and personal factors also had an impact on job burnout among safety professionals. Hence, to begin with, these aspects could be considered to alleviate the work pressure of safety professionals and reduce their job burnout levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Bing Wang & Yuanjie Wang, 2021. "Job Burnout among Safety Professionals: A Chinese Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8343-:d:609742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8343/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8343/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Hong & Chen, Feiyu & Zhu, Dandan & Qi, Hui & Long, Ruyin, 2015. "Burnout in Chinese coal mine safety supervision," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 22-31.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guirong Zhang & Wei Feng & Yu Lei, 2022. "Human Factor Analysis (HFA) Based on a Complex Network and Its Application in Gas Explosion Accidents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-20, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Lu & Zhao, Qiuhong & Bi, Yanlin, 2020. "Why rent-seeking behavior may exist in Chinese mining safety production inspection system and how to alleviate it: A tripartite game analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Liu, Quanlong & Wang, Jingzhi & Qiu, Zunxiang, 2023. "Data as evidence: Research on the influencing factors and mechanisms of coal mine safety supervision effect in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Wang, Yuxin & Fu, Gui & Lyu, Qian & Wu, Yali & Jia, Qinsong & Yang, Xiaoyu & Li, Xiao, 2022. "Reform and development of coal mine safety in China: An analysis from government supervision, technical equipment, and miner education," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Jun Tu & Liangdong Wan & Zijiao Sun, 2023. "Safety Improvement of Sustainable Coal Transportation in Mines: A Contract Design Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Xiaoyi Yang & Boling Zhang & Lulu Wang & Lanxin Cao & Ruipeng Tong, 2021. "Exploring the Relationships between Safety Compliance, Safety Participation and Safety Outcomes: Considering the Moderating Role of Job Burnout," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-13, April.
    6. Li, Wei & Sun, Wen & Li, Guomin & Jin, Baihui & Wu, Wen & Cui, Pengfei & Zhao, Guohao, 2018. "Transmission mechanism between energy prices and carbon emissions using geographically weighted regression," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 434-442.
    7. Han, Shuai & Chen, Hong & Stemn, Eric & Owen, John, 2019. "Interactions between organisational roles and environmental hazards: The case of safety in the Chinese coal industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 36-46.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8343-:d:609742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.