IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i21p4248-d282559.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecosystem-Based Adaptation Projects, More than just Adaptation: Analysis of Social Benefits and Costs in Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen Richerzhagen

    (German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Tulpenfeld 6, 53113 Bonn, Germany)

  • Jean Carlo Rodríguez de Francisco

    (German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Tulpenfeld 6, 53113 Bonn, Germany)

  • Felix Weinsheimer

    (German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Tulpenfeld 6, 53113 Bonn, Germany)

  • Alessandro Döhnert

    (German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Tulpenfeld 6, 53113 Bonn, Germany)

  • Lukas Kleiner

    (German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Tulpenfeld 6, 53113 Bonn, Germany)

  • Marjam Mayer

    (German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Tulpenfeld 6, 53113 Bonn, Germany)

  • Julia Morawietz

    (German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Tulpenfeld 6, 53113 Bonn, Germany)

  • Eric Philipp

    (German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Tulpenfeld 6, 53113 Bonn, Germany)

Abstract

Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EbA) projects are increasingly flourishing throughout the globe on the grounds that EbA constitutes a particularly community-friendly solution for adaptation to climate change as it brings about an array of co-benefits. However, the promotion of EbA projects, by development agencies and conservation NGOs, remains blurry as it has not yet been contrasted against evidence on its effectiveness in delivering these benefits. Employing a political ecology perspective, the applied conceptual framework allows for the assessment of the social benefits and costs that EbA projects generate or reinforce and factors that influence the distribution of these social benefits or costs. This research is done in regards to two EbA projects in Colombia: one in the Andes focusing on water provision services from páramos, and the other in a coastal mangrove focusing on regulation services of extreme coastal events. Based on data collected by a qualitative multi-method approach, we find evidence that the assessed EbA projects generate a wide range of perceived social benefits and costs for the local communities living in the vicinity of the project sites. Furthermore, we identify agent-level (i.e., capitals and preferences) as well as structural factors (communication, participation, local and institutional context) that influence the generation and distribution of those social benefits and costs. Finally, this paper illustrates some of the contradictions and tensions in which EbA projects are implemented and how they may end up affecting the adaptive capacity of the communities involved in EbA projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen Richerzhagen & Jean Carlo Rodríguez de Francisco & Felix Weinsheimer & Alessandro Döhnert & Lukas Kleiner & Marjam Mayer & Julia Morawietz & Eric Philipp, 2019. "Ecosystem-Based Adaptation Projects, More than just Adaptation: Analysis of Social Benefits and Costs in Colombia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:21:p:4248-:d:282559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/21/4248/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/21/4248/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joanne Chong, 2014. "Ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation: progress and challenges," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 391-405, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nazmul Huq & Antje Bruns & Lars Ribbe & Saleemul Huq, 2017. "Mainstreaming Ecosystem Services Based Climate Change Adaptation (EbA) in Bangladesh: Status, Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Matteo Roggero & Leonhard Kähler & Achim Hagen, 2019. "Strategic cooperation for transnational adaptation: lessons from the economics of climate change mitigation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 395-410, October.
    3. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    4. Gannon, Kate & Crick, Florence & Atela, Joanes & Babagaliyeva, Shanna & Batool, Samavia & Bedelian, Claire & Conway, Declan & Diop, Mamadou & Fankhauser, Samuel & Jobbins, Guy & Ludi, Eva & Qaisrani, , 2020. "Private adaptation in semi-arid lands: a tailored approach to ‘leave no one behind’," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102537, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Kristin Rosendal & Jon Birger Skjærseth & Steinar Andresen, 2019. "Knowledge-based management of protected areas and hydropower: the case of Norway," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 515-530, October.
    6. Weronika Jakubczak & Anna Golebiowska & Dariusz Prokopowicz & Ryszard Jakubczak, 2021. "The Key Security Problems Related to the Pro-Environmental Economic Transformation and the Implementation of the Principles of Sustainable Development into the Economy," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 218-250.
    7. Anita Milman & Kripa Jagannathan, 2017. "Conceptualization and implementation of ecosystems-based adaptation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 113-127, May.
    8. Kennedy Muthee & Lalisa Duguma & Judith Nzyoka & Peter Minang, 2021. "Ecosystem-Based Adaptation Practices as a Nature-Based Solution to Promote Water-Energy-Food Nexus Balance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Christine Wamsler & Stephan Pauleit, 2016. "Making headway in climate policy mainstreaming and ecosystem-based adaptation: two pioneering countries, different pathways, one goal," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 71-87, July.
    10. Wang, Y. & Huang, J., 2018. "Do forests relieve crop thirst in the face of drought? Empirical evidence from South China," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 276959, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Anna Golebiowska & Weronika Jakubczak & Dariusz Prokopowicz & Ryszard Jakubczak, 2021. "The Post-Pandemic Development of the Green Circular Economy and the Declarations Made During the UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) as Security Determinants," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 251-275.
    12. Buckwell, Andrew & Fleming, Christopher & Muurmans, Maggie & Smart, James C.R. & Ware, Dan & Mackey, Brendan, 2020. "Revealing the dominant discourses of stakeholders towards natural resource management in Port Resolution, Vanuatu, using Q-method," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    13. Sangha, Kamaljit K. & Maynard, Simone & Pearson, Jasmine & Dobriyal, Pariva & Badola, Ruchi & Hussain, Syed Ainul, 2019. "Recognising the role of local and Indigenous communities in managing natural resources for the greater public benefit: Case studies from Asia and Oceania region," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:21:p:4248-:d:282559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.