IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v13y2016i12p1195-d84343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Cervical Screening Behaviour of Women Aged 50 or above and Its Predicting Factors: A Population-Based Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen W. H. Chan

    (The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, China)

  • Kai Chow Choi

    (The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, China)

  • Rosa S. Wong

    (The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, China)

  • Ka Ming Chow

    (The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, China)

  • Winnie K. W. So

    (The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, China)

  • Doris Y. P. Leung

    (The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, China)

  • Wendy W. T. Lam

    (School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • William Goggins

    (School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

Under-screening may increase the risk of cervical cancer in middle-aged women. This study aimed to investigate cervical cancer screening behaviour and its predictors among women aged 50 years or above. A population-based sample of 959 women was recruited by telephone from domestic households in Hong Kong, using random methods, and a structured questionnaire developed to survey participants. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to examine the factors independently associated with cervical screening behaviour. Nearly half the sample (48%) had never had a cervical smear test. Multivariable analyses showed that age, educational level, marital status, family history of cancer, smoking status, use of complementary therapy, recommendation from health professionals, and believing that regular visits to a doctor or a Chinese herbalist were good for their health were predictors of cervical screening behaviour. Misconceptions concerned with menopause may reduce women’s perceived susceptibility to cervical cancer, especially if they are 50 or above, and exert a negative effect on their screening behaviour. Healthcare professionals should actively approach these high-risk groups–older unmarried women, smokers, those less educated and who are generally not much concerned with their health.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen W. H. Chan & Kai Chow Choi & Rosa S. Wong & Ka Ming Chow & Winnie K. W. So & Doris Y. P. Leung & Wendy W. T. Lam & William Goggins, 2016. "Examining the Cervical Screening Behaviour of Women Aged 50 or above and Its Predicting Factors: A Population-Based Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:12:p:1195-:d:84343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/12/1195/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/12/1195/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mengyue Zhang & Janet W. H. Sit & Dorothy Ngo Sheung Chan & Oluwadamilare Akingbade & Carmen W. H. Chan, 2022. "Educational Interventions to Promote Cervical Cancer Screening among Rural Populations: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:12:p:1195-:d:84343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.