IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v4y2012i2p396-412d17278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bloggers’ Community Characteristics and Influence within Greek Political Blogosphere

Author

Listed:
  • Kostas Zafiropoulos

    (Department of International and European Studies, University of Macedonia, Egnatia 156, Thessaloniki 54006, Greece)

  • Vasiliki Vrana

    (Department of Business Administration, Technological Education Institute of Serres, Terma Magnesias, Serres 62124, Greece)

  • Dimitrios Vagianos

    (Department of International and European Studies, University of Macedonia, Egnatia 156, Thessaloniki 54006, Greece)

Abstract

This paper investigates the properties of central or core political blogs. They can be located as clusters of blogs whose members have many incoming links. Other blogs form clouds around them in the sense that they link the core blogs. A case study records Greek political blogs and their incoming links reported through their blogrolls. The adjacency matrix from the blogs’ social network is analyzed and clusters are located. Three of them, those with the larger numbers of incoming links, may be considered to be central. Next, four measures of influence are used to test the influence of the central blogs. The findings suggest that there are many kinds of central blogs, influential and non-influential, and high influence does not always involve high hyperlinking.

Suggested Citation

  • Kostas Zafiropoulos & Vasiliki Vrana & Dimitrios Vagianos, 2012. "Bloggers’ Community Characteristics and Influence within Greek Political Blogosphere," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:396-412:d:17278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/4/2/396/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/4/2/396/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henry Farrell & Daniel Drezner, 2008. "The power and politics of blogs," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 15-30, January.
    2. Deva Woodly, 2008. "New competencies in democratic communication? Blogs, agenda setting and political participation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 109-123, January.
    3. Laura McKenna & Antoinette Pole, 2008. "What do bloggers do: an average day on an average political blog," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 97-108, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kostas Zafiropoulos, 2012. "Connectivity Practices and Activity of Greek Political Blogs," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Gaudeul, Alexia & Mathieu, Laurence & Peroni, Chiara, 2008. "Blogs and the Economics of Reciprocal Attention," MPRA Paper 11298, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Gaudeul, Alexia & Giannetti, Caterina, 2011. "The role of reciprocation in social network formation, with an application to blogging," MPRA Paper 34094, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Maria Besiou & Mark Hunter & Luk Wassenhove, 2013. "A Web of Watchdogs: Stakeholder Media Networks and Agenda-Setting in Response to Corporate Initiatives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(4), pages 709-729, December.
    5. Itziar Castelló & Mette Morsing & Friederike Schultz, 2013. "Communicative Dynamics and the Polyphony of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Network Society," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(4), pages 683-694, December.
    6. John Bryden & Eric Silverman, 2019. "Underlying socio-political processes behind the 2016 US election," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-11, April.
    7. Li Zhang & Peinan Wang, 2022. "Public Attitude and Opinion Leaders: Mapping Chinese Discussion of EU's Energy Role on Social Media," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1777-1796, November.
    8. McKenzie, David & Özler, Berk, 2011. "The Impact of Economics Blogs," CEPR Discussion Papers 8558, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Leticia Bode & Alexander Hanna & Junghwan Yang & Dhavan V. Shah, 2015. "Candidate Networks, Citizen Clusters, and Political Expression," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 659(1), pages 149-165, May.
    10. Olessia Y. Koltsova & Sergei N. Koltcov & Sergey I. Nikolenko, 2013. "Comment-based discussion communities In the Russian livejournal and their topical coherence," HSE Working papers WP BRP 33/SOC/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    11. Mohamed Sami Ben Ali, 2022. "Digitalization and Banking Crisis: A Nonlinear Relationship?," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 20(2), pages 421-435, June.
    12. Rohit Aggarwal & Ram Gopal & Ramesh Sankaranarayanan & Param Vir Singh, 2012. "Blog, Blogger, and the Firm: Can Negative Employee Posts Lead to Positive Outcomes?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 306-322, June.
    13. Luis Pérez-González, 2020. "‘Is climate science taking over the science?’: A corpus-based study of competing stances on bias, dogma and expertise in the blogosphere," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Franch, Fabio, 2021. "Political preferences nowcasting with factor analysis and internet data: The 2012 and 2016 US presidential elections," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    15. David McKenzie & Berk Özler, 2014. "Quantifying Some of the Impacts of Economics Blogs," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 62(3), pages 567-597.
    16. Jimmy Chan & Daniel Stone, 2013. "Media proliferation and partisan selective exposure," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 467-490, September.
    17. Lin Hu & Anqi Li & Xu Tan, 2021. "A Rational Inattention Theory of Echo Chamber," Papers 2104.10657, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    18. Lefika, Pheladi T. & Mearns, Martie A., 2015. "Adding knowledge cafés to the repertoire of knowledge sharing techniques," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 26-32.
    19. Christian Fieseler & Matthes Fleck, 2013. "The Pursuit of Empowerment through Social Media: Structural Social Capital Dynamics in CSR-Blogging," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(4), pages 759-775, December.
    20. Dag Øivind Madsen & Kåre Slåtten, 2015. "Social media and management fashions," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1122256-112, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:396-412:d:17278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.