IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v15y2023i9p313-d1241812.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proof of Flow: A Design Pattern for the Green Energy Market

Author

Listed:
  • Valerio Mandarino

    (Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Pappalardo

    (Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy)

  • Emiliano Tramontana

    (Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy)

Abstract

The increased penetration of Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) in electricity markets has given rise to a new category of energy players, called Aggregators, whose role is to ensure fair remuneration for energy supplied by DERs, and support the smooth feeding of the intermittent energy produced into the distribution network. This paper presents a software solution, described as a design pattern, that governs the interaction between an Aggregator and DERs, leveraging blockchain technology to achieve a higher degree of decentralization, data integrity and security, through a properly designed, blockchain-based, smart contract. Thus, the proposed solution reduces the reliance on intermediaries acting as authorities, while affording transparency, efficiency and trust to the energy exchange process. Thanks to the underlying blockchain properties, generated events are easily observable and cannot be forged or altered. However, blockchain technology has inherent drawbacks, i.e., mainly the cost of storage and execution, hence our solution provides additional strategies for limiting blockchain usage, without undermining its strengths. Moreover, the design of our smart contract takes care of orchestrating the players, and copes with their potential mutual disagreements, which could arise from different measures of energy, providing an automatic decision process to resolve such disputes. The overall approach results in lower fees for running smart contacts supporting energy players and in a greater degree of fairness assurance.

Suggested Citation

  • Valerio Mandarino & Giuseppe Pappalardo & Emiliano Tramontana, 2023. "Proof of Flow: A Design Pattern for the Green Energy Market," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:313-:d:1241812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/15/9/313/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/15/9/313/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aiya Li & Xianhua Wei & Zhou He, 2020. "Robust Proof of Stake: A New Consensus Protocol for Sustainable Blockchain Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Huanliang Xiong & Muxi Chen & Canghai Wu & Yingding Zhao & Wenlong Yi, 2022. "Research on Progress of Blockchain Consensus Algorithm: A Review on Recent Progress of Blockchain Consensus Algorithms," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Elie Kapengut & Bruce Mizrach, 2023. "An Event Study of the Ethereum Transition to Proof-of-Stake," Commodities, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Namryoung Lee, 2023. "The Relationship between a Company’s Cryptocurrency Holdings and Its Sustainable Performance—With a Focus on External and Internal Financial Issues and Cash," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Albérico Travassos Rosário & Joana Carmo Dias, 2023. "The New Digital Economy and Sustainability: Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Vincenzo Varriale & Antonello Cammarano & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2020. "The Unknown Potential of Blockchain for Sustainable Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Ji Tan & S. B. Goyal & Anand Singh Rajawat & Tony Jan & Neda Azizi & Mukesh Prasad, 2023. "Anti-Counterfeiting and Traceability Consensus Algorithm Based on Weightage to Contributors in a Food Supply Chain of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Rameez Asif & Syed Raheel Hassan & Gerard Parr, 2023. "Integrating a Blockchain-Based Governance Framework for Responsible AI," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Tao Yan & Shengnan Li & Benjamin Kraner & Luyao Zhang & Claudio J. Tessone, 2024. "Analyzing Reward Dynamics and Decentralization in Ethereum 2.0: An Advanced Data Engineering Workflow and Comprehensive Datasets for Proof-of-Stake Incentives," Papers 2402.11170, arXiv.org.
    7. Casey Watters, 2023. "Digital Gold or Digital Security? Unravelling the Legal Fabric of Decentralised Digital Assets," Commodities, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-12, October.
    8. Carlo Gola & Johannes Sedlmeir, 2022. "Addressing the Sustainability of Distributed Ledger Technology," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 670, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    9. Luyao Zhang & Fan Zhang, 2023. "Understand Waiting Time in Transaction Fee Mechanism: An Interdisciplinary Perspective," Papers 2305.02552, arXiv.org.
    10. Hongbin Hu & Yongbin Wang, 2022. "Research on Convergence Media Consensus Mechanism Based on Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-27, September.
    11. Fabio Caldarola & Gianfranco d’Atri & Enrico Zanardo, 2022. "Neural Fairness Blockchain Protocol Using an Elliptic Curves Lottery," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Ying Zhang & Wenwen Luo & Feifei Yu, 2020. "Construction of Chinese Smart Water Conservancy Platform Based on the Blockchain: Technology Integration and Innovation Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Furqan Jameel & Uzair Javaid & Wali Ullah Khan & Muhammad Naveed Aman & Haris Pervaiz & Riku Jäntti, 2020. "Reinforcement Learning in Blockchain-Enabled IIoT Networks: A Survey of Recent Advances and Open Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, June.
    14. Gousia Habib & Sparsh Sharma & Sara Ibrahim & Imtiaz Ahmad & Shaima Qureshi & Malik Ishfaq, 2022. "Blockchain Technology: Benefits, Challenges, Applications, and Integration of Blockchain Technology with Cloud Computing," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Yan, Tao & Li, Shengnan & Kraner, Benjamin & Zhang, Luyao & Tessone, Claudio J., 2024. "Analyzing Reward Dynamics and Decentralization in Ethereum 2.0: An Advanced Data Engineering Workflow and Comprehensive Datasets for Proof-of-Stake Incentives," OSF Preprints 6ceuz, Center for Open Science.
    16. Tanus Bikram Malla & Abhinav Bhattarai & Amrit Parajuli & Ashish Shrestha & Bhupendra Bimal Chhetri & Kamal Chapagain, 2022. "Status, Challenges and Future Directions of Blockchain Technology in Power System: A State of Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    17. Agur, Itai & Lavayssière, Xavier & Villegas Bauer, Germán & Deodoro, Jose & Martinez Peria, Soledad & Sandri, Damiano & Tourpe, Hervé, 2023. "Lessons from crypto assets for the design of energy efficient digital currencies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    18. Patrici Calvo, 2024. "Cryptoart: ethical challenges of the NFT revolution," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:313-:d:1241812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.