IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i6p1458-d1359031.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Permeability Prediction of Carbonate Reservoir Based on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Logging and Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Jianpeng Zhao

    (School of Earth Sciences & Engineering, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China
    Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Geology, Xi’an 710065, China)

  • Qi Wang

    (School of Earth Sciences & Engineering, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China
    Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Geology, Xi’an 710065, China)

  • Wei Rong

    (Geological Research Institute, China Petroleum Logging Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710075, China)

  • Jingbo Zeng

    (Geological Research Institute, China Petroleum Logging Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710075, China)

  • Yawen Ren

    (Geological Research Institute, China Petroleum Logging Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710075, China)

  • Hui Chen

    (Geological Research Institute, China Petroleum Logging Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710075, China)

Abstract

Reservoir permeability is an important parameter for reservoir characterization and the estimation of current and future production from hydrocarbon reservoirs. Logging data is an important means of evaluating the continuous permeability curve of the whole well section. Nuclear magnetic resonance logging measurement results are less affected by lithology and have obvious advantages in interpreting permeability. The Coates model, SDR model, and other complex mathematical equations used in NMR logging may achieve a precise approximation of the permeability values. However, the empirical parameters in those models often need to be determined according to the nuclear magnetic resonance experiment, which is time-consuming and expensive. Machine learning, as an efficient data mining method, has been increasingly applied to logging interpretation. XGBoost algorithm is applied to the permeability interpretation of carbonate reservoirs. Based on the actual logging interpretation data, with the proportion of different pore components and the logarithmic mean value of T2 in the NMR logging interpretation results as the input variables, a regression prediction model is established through XGBoost algorithm to predict the permeability curve, and the optimization of various parameters in XGBoost algorithm is discussed. The determination coefficient is utilized to check the overall fitting between measured permeability versus predicted ones. It is found that XGBoost algorithm achieved overall better performance than the traditional models.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianpeng Zhao & Qi Wang & Wei Rong & Jingbo Zeng & Yawen Ren & Hui Chen, 2024. "Permeability Prediction of Carbonate Reservoir Based on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Logging and Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:1458-:d:1359031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/6/1458/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/6/1458/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xue, Kunpeng & Liu, Yu & Yu, Tao & Yang, Lei & Zhao, Jiafei & Song, Yongchen, 2023. "Numerical simulation of gas hydrate production in shenhu area using depressurization: The effect of reservoir permeability heterogeneity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu Yu & Hongfeng Lu & Liang Zhang & Chenlu Xu & Zenggui Kuang & Xian Li & Han Yu & Yejia Wang, 2023. "Assessment of Gas Production from Complex Hydrate System in Qiongdongnan Basin of South China Sea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Li, Yanghui & Hu, Wenkang & Tang, Haoran & Wu, Peng & Liu, Tao & You, Zeshao & Yu, Tao & Song, Yongchen, 2023. "Mechanical properties of the interstratified hydrate-bearing sediment in permafrost zones," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:1458-:d:1359031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.