IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i5p1180-d1349597.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertainty Quantification in CO 2 Trapping Mechanisms: A Case Study of PUNQ-S3 Reservoir Model Using Representative Geological Realizations and Unsupervised Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Seyed Kourosh Mahjour

    (Geo-Intelligence Laboratory, Ingram School of Engineering, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA
    Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Science (TIAER), Tarleton State University, Stephenville, TX 76401, USA)

  • Jobayed Hossain Badhan

    (Geo-Intelligence Laboratory, Ingram School of Engineering, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA)

  • Salah A. Faroughi

    (Geo-Intelligence Laboratory, Ingram School of Engineering, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA)

Abstract

Evaluating uncertainty in CO 2 injection projections often requires numerous high-resolution geological realizations (GRs) which, although effective, are computationally demanding. This study proposes the use of representative geological realizations (RGRs) as an efficient approach to capture the uncertainty range of the full set while reducing computational costs. A predetermined number of RGRs is selected using an integrated unsupervised machine learning (UML) framework, which includes Euclidean distance measurement, multidimensional scaling (MDS), and a deterministic K-means (DK-means) clustering algorithm. In the context of the intricate 3D aquifer CO 2 storage model, PUNQ-S3, these algorithms are utilized. The UML methodology selects five RGRs from a pool of 25 possibilities (20% of the total), taking into account the reservoir quality index (RQI) as a static parameter of the reservoir. To determine the credibility of these RGRs, their simulation results are scrutinized through the application of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) test, which analyzes the distribution of the output. In this assessment, 40 CO 2 injection wells cover the entire reservoir alongside the full set. The end-point simulation results indicate that the CO 2 structural, residual, and solubility trapping within the RGRs and full set follow the same distribution. Simulating five RGRs alongside the full set of 25 GRs over 200 years, involving 10 years of CO 2 injection, reveals consistently similar trapping distribution patterns, with an average value of D max of 0.21 remaining lower than D critical (0.66). Using this methodology, computational expenses related to scenario testing and development planning for CO 2 storage reservoirs in the presence of geological uncertainties can be substantially reduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyed Kourosh Mahjour & Jobayed Hossain Badhan & Salah A. Faroughi, 2024. "Uncertainty Quantification in CO 2 Trapping Mechanisms: A Case Study of PUNQ-S3 Reservoir Model Using Representative Geological Realizations and Unsupervised Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:5:p:1180-:d:1349597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/5/1180/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/5/1180/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jin, Lu & Hawthorne, Steven & Sorensen, James & Pekot, Lawrence & Kurz, Bethany & Smith, Steven & Heebink, Loreal & Herdegen, Volker & Bosshart, Nicholas & Torres, José & Dalkhaa, Chantsalmaa & Peters, 2017. "Advancing CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage in unconventional oil play—Experimental studies on Bakken shales," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 171-183.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:5:p:1180-:d:1349597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.