IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i20p7460-d938812.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence-Based Consequence Assessment of Subsea Pipeline Failure under Stochastic Degradation

Author

Listed:
  • Sidum Adumene

    (School of Ocean Technology, Marine Institute, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1C 5R3, Canada)

  • Rabiul Islam

    (National Centre for Ports and Shipping (NCPS), Australian Maritime College (AMC), University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia)

  • Ibitoru Festus Dick

    (Department of Marine Engineering, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt PMB 5080, Nigeria)

  • Esmaeil Zarei

    (Centre for Risk, Integrity and Safety Engineering (C-RISE), Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3X5, Canada)

  • Morrison Inegiyemiema

    (Department of Marine Engineering, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt PMB 5080, Nigeria)

  • Ming Yang

    (Safety and Security Science Section, Department of Values, Technology, and Innovation, Faculty of Technology, Policy, and Management, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands
    National Centre for Maritime Engineering and Hydrodynamics, Australian Maritime College (AMC), University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia
    Centre of Hydrogen Energy, Institute of Future Energy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Johor Bahru 81310, Johor, Malaysia)

Abstract

The complexity of corrosion mechanisms in harsh offshore environments poses safety and integrity challenges to oil and gas operations. Exploring the unstable interactions and complex mechanisms required an advanced probabilistic model. The current study presents the development of a probabilistic approach for a consequence-based assessment of subsea pipelines exposed to complex corrosion mechanisms. The Bayesian Probabilistic Network (BPN) is applied to structurally learn the propagation and interactions among under-deposit corrosion and microbial corrosion for the failure state prediction of the asset. A two-step consequences analysis is inferred from the failure state to establish the failure impact on the environment, lives, and economic losses. The essence is to understand how the interactions between the under-deposit and microbial corrosion mechanisms’ nodes influence the likely number of spills on the environment. The associated cost of failure consequences is predicted using the expected utility decision theory. The proposed approach is tested on a corroding subsea pipeline (API X60) to predict the degree of impact of the failed state on the asset’s likely consequences. At the worst degradation state, the failure consequence expected utility gives 1.0822 × 10 8 USD . The influence-based model provides a prognostic tool for proactive integrity management planning for subsea systems exposed to stochastic degradation in harsh offshore environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Sidum Adumene & Rabiul Islam & Ibitoru Festus Dick & Esmaeil Zarei & Morrison Inegiyemiema & Ming Yang, 2022. "Influence-Based Consequence Assessment of Subsea Pipeline Failure under Stochastic Degradation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-10, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7460-:d:938812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7460/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7460/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robison, Lindon J. & Shupp, Robert S. & Myers, Robert J., 2010. "Expected utility paradoxes," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 187-193, April.
    2. Adumene, Sidum & Khan, Faisal & Adedigba, Sunday & Zendehboudi, Sohrab, 2021. "Offshore system safety and reliability considering microbial influenced multiple failure modes and their interdependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Xie, Yi & Zhang, Jinsuo & Aldemir, Tunc & Denning, Richard, 2018. "Multi-state Markov modeling of pitting corrosion in stainless steel exposed to chloride-containing environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 239-248.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dao, Uyen & Sajid, Zaman & Khan, Faisal & Zhang, Yahui, 2023. "Dynamic Bayesian network model to study under-deposit corrosion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. Dao, Uyen & Sajid, Zaman & Khan, Faisal & Zhang, Yahui & Tran, Trung, 2023. "Modeling and analysis of internal corrosion induced failure of oil and gas pipelines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yazdi, Mohammad & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh & Quddus, Noor & Castaneda-Lopez, Homero, 2022. "A review of risk-based decision-making models for microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) in offshore pipelines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    2. Love, Ross O. & Robison, Lindon J., 1984. "An Empirical Analysis Of The Intertemporal Stability Of Risk Preference," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(1), pages 1-7, July.
    3. Mendoza, Jorge & Bismut, Elizabeth & Straub, Daniel & Köhler, Jochen, 2022. "Optimal life-cycle mitigation of fatigue failure risk for structural systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    4. Ruiz-Castro, Juan Eloy & Dawabsha, Mohammed & Alonso, Francisco Javier, 2018. "Discrete-time Markovian arrival processes to model multi-state complex systems with loss of units and an indeterminate variable number of repairpersons," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 114-127.
    5. Pennings, Joost M.E. & Garcia, Philip, 2004. "Strategic Risk Management Behavior: What Can Utility Functions Tell Us?," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20388, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Ramaratnam, S. Sri & Rister, M. Edward & Bessler, David A. & Novak, James, 1986. "Risk Attitudes and Farm/Producer Attributes: A Case Study of Texas Coastal Bend Grain Sorghum Producers," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 85-96, December.
    7. Bansal, Parth & Zheng, Zhuoyuan & Shao, Chenhui & Li, Jingjing & Banu, Mihaela & Carlson, Blair E & Li, Yumeng, 2022. "Physics-informed machine learning assisted uncertainty quantification for the corrosion of dissimilar material joints," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    8. David S. Bullock & Philip Garcia & Kie‐Yup Shin, 2005. "Measuring producer welfare under output price uncertainty and risk non‐neutrality," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 49(1), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Lu, Cheng & Teng, Da & Chen, Jun-Yu & Fei, Cheng-Wei & Keshtegar, Behrooz, 2023. "Adaptive vectorial surrogate modeling framework for multi-objective reliability estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    10. Halter, A.N. & Mason, Robert, 1978. "Utility Measurement For Those Who Need To Know," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 3(2), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Liu, Zengkai & Ma, Qiang & Cai, Baoping & Shi, Xuewei & Zheng, Chao & Liu, Yonghong, 2022. "Risk coupling analysis of subsea blowout accidents based on dynamic Bayesian network and NK model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    12. Nagode, Marko & Oman, Simon & Klemenc, Jernej & Panić, Branislav, 2023. "Gumbel mixture modelling for multiple failure data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    13. Robison, Lindon & Oliver, Jeffrey & Frank, Kenneth, 2015. "Commodity and Relational Good Exchanges: Commodification and Decommodification," 2015 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting, January 3-5, 2015, Boston, Massachusetts 189690, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Eranova, Mariya & Prashantham, Shameen, 2016. "Decision making and paradox: Why study China?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 193-201.
    15. Wu, Shengnan & Zhang, Qiao & Li, Bin & Zhang, Laibin & Zheng, Wenpei & Li, Zhong & Li, Zhandong & Liu, Yiliu, 2023. "Reliability analysis of subsea wellhead system subject to fatigue and degradation during service life," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    16. Lindon J. Robison & Jeffrey R. Oliver, 2023. "Rationalizing predictably irrational choices: the social capital synthesis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 70(3), pages 611-631, June.
    17. Zheng, Xiao-Wei & Li, Hong-Nan & Gardoni, Paolo, 2023. "Hybrid Bayesian-Copula-based risk assessment for tall buildings subject to wind loads considering various uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    18. Gomez-Limon, Jose Antonio & Riesgo, Laura & Arriaza Balmón, Manuel, 2002. "Agricultural Risk Aversion Revisited: A Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24827, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Dao, Uyen & Sajid, Zaman & Khan, Faisal & Zhang, Yahui, 2023. "Dynamic Bayesian network model to study under-deposit corrosion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    20. Lence, Sergio H., 2008. "How Much Can We Learn About Producers' Utility Functions from Their Production Data?," 2008 Agricultural and Rural Finance Markets in Transition, September 25-26, 2008, Kansas City, Missouri 119534, Regional Research Committee NC-1014: Agricultural and Rural Finance Markets in Transition.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7460-:d:938812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.