IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i19p7342-d934734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient Sensitivity Analysis for Enhanced Heat Transfer Performance of Heat Sink with Swirl Flow Structure under One-Side Heating

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Tao

    (School of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China)

  • Yuanlai Xie

    (Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China)

  • Chundong Hu

    (Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China)

Abstract

Excellent heat transfer performance has increasingly become a key issue that needs to be solved urgently in the development process of large-scale fusion equipment. The study of heat transfer performance improvement to scientifically and reasonably determine the design parameters of the high heat flow (HHF) components of fusion reactors based on the efficient in-depth analysis of the heat transfer mechanism and its sensitive factors is of great significance. In this paper, a liquid-vapor two-phase flow model with subcooled boiling for a large length-diameter ratio swirl tube structure in the HHF calorimeter component is proposed to analyze the effects of key design parameters (such as inlet temperature of cooling water flow, swirl tube structure parameters, etc.) on its heat transfer performance. Then, considering the high computational cost of the liquid-vapor two-phase flow model, and in order to improve the efficiency of the sensitivity analysis of these design parameters, the polynomial response surface surrogate model of heat transfer performance function was constructed based on Latin hypercube sampling. On this basis, by combining the proposed surrogate model, the sensitivity index of each design parameter could be obtained efficiently using the Sobol global sensitivity analysis method. This method could greatly improve the calculation efficiency of the design parameter sensitivity analysis of HHF components in the fusion reactor, which provides vital guidance for the subsequent rapid design optimization of related components.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Tao & Yuanlai Xie & Chundong Hu, 2022. "Efficient Sensitivity Analysis for Enhanced Heat Transfer Performance of Heat Sink with Swirl Flow Structure under One-Side Heating," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:19:p:7342-:d:934734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/19/7342/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/19/7342/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antoniadis, Anestis & Lambert-Lacroix, Sophie & Poggi, Jean-Michel, 2021. "Random forests for global sensitivity analysis: A selective review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    2. Buzzard, Gregery T., 2012. "Global sensitivity analysis using sparse grid interpolation and polynomial chaos," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 82-89.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matieyendou Lamboni, 2020. "Uncertainty quantification: a minimum variance unbiased (joint) estimator of the non-normalized Sobol’ indices," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 1939-1970, October.
    2. Kim, Jun Young & Kim, Dongjae & Li, Zezhong John & Dariva, Claudio & Cao, Yankai & Ellis, Naoko, 2023. "Predicting and optimizing syngas production from fluidized bed biomass gasifiers: A machine learning approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    3. Mehdi Dasineh & Amir Ghaderi & Mohammad Bagherzadeh & Mohammad Ahmadi & Alban Kuriqi, 2021. "Prediction of Hydraulic Jumps on a Triangular Bed Roughness Using Numerical Modeling and Soft Computing Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Torii, André Jacomel & Novotny, Antonio André, 2021. "A priori error estimates for local reliability-based sensitivity analysis with Monte Carlo Simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    5. Jung, WoongHee & Taflanidis, Alexandros A., 2023. "Efficient global sensitivity analysis for high-dimensional outputs combining data-driven probability models and dimensionality reduction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    6. Brown, S. & Beck, J. & Mahgerefteh, H. & Fraga, E.S., 2013. "Global sensitivity analysis of the impact of impurities on CO2 pipeline failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 43-54.
    7. Pilowsky, Julia A. & Manica, Andrea & Brown, Stuart & Rahbek, Carsten & Fordham, Damien A., 2022. "Simulations of human migration into North America are more sensitive to demography than choice of palaeoclimate model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).
    8. Matieyendou Lamboni, 2018. "Global sensitivity analysis: a generalized, unbiased and optimal estimator of total-effect variance," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 361-386, March.
    9. Wu, Zeping & Wang, Donghui & Okolo N, Patrick & Hu, Fan & Zhang, Weihua, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis using a Gaussian Radial Basis Function metamodel," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 171-179.
    10. Xiang Peng & Xiaoqing Xu & Jiquan Li & Shaofei Jiang, 2021. "A Sampling-Based Sensitivity Analysis Method Considering the Uncertainties of Input Variables and Their Distribution Parameters," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Chen, Xuyong & Xu, Zhifeng & Wu, Yushun & Wu, Qiaoyun, 2023. "Heuristic algorithms for reliability estimation based on breadth-first search of a grid tree," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    12. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 869-887.
    13. Vuillod, Bruno & Montemurro, Marco & Panettieri, Enrico & Hallo, Ludovic, 2023. "A comparison between Sobol’s indices and Shapley’s effect for global sensitivity analysis of systems with independent input variables," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    14. Chien-Chih Wang & Yu-Hsun Li, 2022. "Machine-Learning-Based System for the Detection of Entanglement in Dyeing and Finishing Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-12, July.
    15. Beccacece, Francesca & Borgonovo, Emanuele & Buzzard, Greg & Cillo, Alessandra & Zionts, Stanley, 2015. "Elicitation of multiattribute value functions through high dimensional model representations: Monotonicity and interactions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 517-527.
    16. Oladyshkin, Sergey & Nowak, Wolfgang, 2018. "Incomplete statistical information limits the utility of high-order polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 137-148.
    17. Goda, Takashi, 2021. "A simple algorithm for global sensitivity analysis with Shapley effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    18. Ballester-Ripoll, Rafael & Leonelli, Manuele, 2022. "Computing Sobol indices in probabilistic graphical models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    19. Gao, Zhikun & Yu, Junqi & Zhao, Anjun & Hu, Qun & Yang, Siyuan, 2022. "A hybrid method of cooling load forecasting for large commercial building based on extreme learning machine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    20. Wu, Zeping & Wang, Wenjie & Wang, Donghui & Zhao, Kun & Zhang, Weihua, 2019. "Global sensitivity analysis using orthogonal augmented radial basis function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 291-302.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:19:p:7342-:d:934734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.