IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i20p5376-d428433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of Two Cable Yarder Technologies Performing Thinning Operations on a 33 Year Old Pine Plantation: A Potential Source of Wood for Energy

Author

Listed:
  • Rodolfo Picchio

    (Department of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Rachele Venanzi

    (Department of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Nicolò Di Marzio

    (Department of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Damiano Tocci

    (Department of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Farzam Tavankar

    (Department of Forestry, Khalkhal Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khalkhal 56817-31367, Iran)

Abstract

In central Italy, there are extensive European black pine ( Pinus nigra Arn.) plantations which range from 30 to 60 years of age and where no thinning operations have been made. The main purpose of this study was to provide a comparative analysis of two cable yarder technologies (Maxwald, mobile pulley carriage and Savall, semi-automatic carriage), in terms of fuelwood production and cost, from the first thinning of a 33 year old plantation in slope areas of these plantations. The results showed that fuelwood production was cost-effective in both systems (Savall by 15.1 and Maxwald by 14.8 € m −3 ), although the productivity of the Savall system was higher than the Maxwald system (6.1 vs. 5.7 m 3 h −1 ). The respect amounts of productivity have the potential to increase by 27% for the Savall yarder and 25% for the Maxwald yarder upon condition that the delay times are reduced to minimum level by proper training of workers, by a better organization, and planning of operations. The total effective CO 2 emission by the Savall yarder was lower than the Maxwald yarder (1735 vs. 1772 g m −3 ). A sustainable production of fuelwood that is economically advantageous and environmentally sound in these plantations can be realized through an appropriate mechanization level and constant interaction with the silvicultural planning. This must be completed with adequate and efficient worker training.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodolfo Picchio & Rachele Venanzi & Nicolò Di Marzio & Damiano Tocci & Farzam Tavankar, 2020. "A Comparative Analysis of Two Cable Yarder Technologies Performing Thinning Operations on a 33 Year Old Pine Plantation: A Potential Source of Wood for Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:20:p:5376-:d:428433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5376/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5376/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodolfo Picchio & Raffaello Spina & Alessandro Sirna & Angela Lo Monaco & Vincenzo Civitarese & Angelo Del Giudice & Alessandro Suardi & Luigi Pari, 2012. "Characterization of Woodchips for Energy from Forestry and Agroforestry Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(10), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Janine Schweier & Boško Blagojević & Rachele Venanzi & Francesco Latterini & Rodolfo Picchio, 2019. "Sustainability Assessment of Alternative Strip Clear Cutting Operations for Wood Chip Production in Renaturalization Management of Pine Stands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Rodolfo Picchio & Francesco Latterini & Rachele Venanzi & Walter Stefanoni & Alessandro Suardi & Damiano Tocci & Luigi Pari, 2020. "Pellet Production from Woody and Non-Woody Feedstocks: A Review on Biomass Quality Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Farzam Tavankar & Mehrdad Nikooy & Francesco Latterini & Rachele Venanzi & Leonardo Bianchini & Rodolfo Picchio, 2021. "The Effects of Soil Moisture on Harvesting Operations in Populus spp. Plantations: Specific Focus on Costs, Energy Balance and GHG Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Colantoni & Rodolfo Picchio & Alvaro Marucci & Elena Di Mattia & Valerio Cristofori & Fabio Recanatesi & Mauro Villarini & Danilo Monarca & Massimo Cecchini, 2020. "WP3—Innovation in Agriculture and Forestry Sector for Energetic Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-7, November.
    2. Luigi Pari & Francesco Latterini & Walter Stefanoni, 2020. "Herbaceous Oil Crops, a Review on Mechanical Harvesting State of the Art," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, July.
    3. Onu Onu Olughu & Lope G. Tabil & Tim Dumonceaux & Edmund Mupondwa & Duncan Cree, 2021. "Comparative Study on Quality of Fuel Pellets from Switchgrass Treated with Different White-Rot Fungi," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Azadeh Khoramizadeh & Meghdad Jourgholami & Mohammad Jafari & Rachele Venanzi & Farzam Tavankar & Rodolfo Picchio, 2021. "Soil Restoration through the Application of Organic Mulch Following Skidding Operations Causing Vehicle Induced Compaction in the Hyrcanian Forests, Northern Iran," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Paweł Stachowicz & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski, 2022. "Thermophysical Properties and Elemental Composition of Black Locust, Poplar and Willow Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Menelio Bardales & Catherine Bukowski & Valentín Molina-Moreno & Francisco Jesús Gálvez-Sánchez & Ángel Fermín Ramos-Ridao, 2022. "A Tool for the Assessment of Forest Biomass as a Source of Rural Sustainable Energy in Natural Areas in Honduras," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Magdalena Dołżyńska & Sławomir Obidziński & Jolanta Piekut & Güray Yildiz, 2020. "The Utilization of Plum Stones for Pellet Production and Investigation of Post-Combustion Flue Gas Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Walter Stefanoni & Francesco Latterini & Javier Prieto Ruiz & Simone Bergonzoli & Consuelo Attolico & Luigi Pari, 2020. "Mechanical Harvesting of Camelina: Work Productivity, Costs and Seed Loss Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Tomasz Dudek, 2020. "The Impacts of the Energy Potential of Forest Biomass on the Local Market: An Example of South-Eastern Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-11, September.
    10. Marek Wieruszewski & Aleksandra Górna & Katarzyna Mydlarz & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2022. "Wood Biomass Resources in Poland Depending on Forest Structure and Industrial Processing of Wood Raw Material," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2020. "Torrefied Biomass as an Alternative in Coal-Fueled Power Plants: A Case Study on Grindability of Agroforestry Waste Forms," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-20, July.
    12. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Stachowicz, Paweł & Dudziec, Paweł, 2022. "Wood pellet quality depending on dendromass species," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 498-508.
    13. Ewelina Olba-Zięty & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Michał Krzyżaniak & Kazimierz Warmiński, 2020. "Willow Cultivation as Feedstock for Bioenergy-External Production Cost," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Nunes, L.J.R. & Matias, J.C.O. & Catalão, J.P.S., 2014. "A review on torrefied biomass pellets as a sustainable alternative to coal in power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 153-160.
    15. Krzysztof Mudryk & Marcin Jewiarz & Marek Wróbel & Marcin Niemiec & Arkadiusz Dyjakon, 2021. "Evaluation of Urban Tree Leaf Biomass-Potential, Physico-Mechanical and Chemical Parameters of Raw Material and Solid Biofuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    16. Vincenzo Civitarese & Andrea Acampora & Giulio Sperandio & Alberto Assirelli & Rodolfo Picchio, 2019. "Production of Wood Pellets from Poplar Trees Managed as Coppices with Different Harvesting Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Teijo Palander & Kalle Kärhä, 2016. "Adaptive Procurement Guidelines for Automatic Selection of Renewable Forest Energy Sources within a Sustainable Energy Production System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-10, March.
    18. Francesco Latterini & Walter Stefanoni & Alessandro Suardi & Vincenzo Alfano & Simone Bergonzoli & Nadia Palmieri & Luigi Pari, 2020. "A GIS Approach to Locate a Small Size Biomass Plant Powered by Olive Pruning and to Estimate Supply Chain Costs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Jakub Stolarski & Sławomir Wierzbicki & Szymon Nitkiewicz & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski, 2023. "Wood Chip Production Efficiency Depending on Chipper Type," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-15, June.
    20. T. Badal & J. Kšica & V. Vala & D. Šafařík, 2015. "Energy yield of logging residues of the south-eastern region of the Czech Republic," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(8), pages 339-344.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:20:p:5376-:d:428433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.