IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v7y2019i2p29-d219097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correction of Accounting Errors through Post Balance Sheet Event Analysis for Romanian Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Monica Laura Zlati

    (Department of Accounting, Audit and Finance, Stefan cel Mare University, 720229 Suceava, Romania)

  • Valentin Marian Antohi

    (Departament of Business Administration, Dunarea de Jos University/Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, 800001 Galati, Romania)

  • Petronela Cardon

    (Departament of Business Administration, Dunarea de Jos University/Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, 800001 Galati, Romania)

Abstract

The study scope is to present the typology of the events analyzed through our research and their impact on the quality of reported financial data. The objectives of the study are to analyze the vulnerability of enterprises according to methodological criteria such as risks and calculations of the risk profile, as well as to establish the necessary measures for correcting the accounting errors based on the conclusions drawn from the analysis. The method used is prospective, financial analysis of the data taken from the financial statements of the companies included in the sample, dynamic for a period of 6 years (2011–2016). Based on the method used, a risk model has been conceptualized to identify the vulnerabilities and risks reported in the financial statements and to define a company risk profile based on which error correction measures can be adopted. Considering the amplitude of the necessary check-ups and the methodology of the imposed accounting treatments, we believe that the topic addressed is a real area of interest for the professional accountants because it organizes the application procedures and limits the impact of errors on the quality of financial reporting in Romania.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica Laura Zlati & Valentin Marian Antohi & Petronela Cardon, 2019. "Correction of Accounting Errors through Post Balance Sheet Event Analysis for Romanian Companies," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:29-:d:219097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/7/2/29/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/7/2/29/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bonsall, Samuel B. & Leone, Andrew J. & Miller, Brian P. & Rennekamp, Kristina, 2017. "A plain English measure of financial reporting readability," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 329-357.
    2. Vivian W. Fang & Allen H. Huang & Wenyu Wang, 2017. "Imperfect Accounting and Reporting Bias," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 919-962, September.
    3. John R. Graham & Michelle Hanlon & Terry Shevlin, 2011. "Real Effects of Accounting Rules: Evidence from Multinational Firms’ Investment Location and Profit Repatriation Decisions," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 137-185, March.
    4. Dyer, Travis & Lang, Mark & Stice-Lawrence, Lorien, 2017. "The evolution of 10-K textual disclosure: Evidence from Latent Dirichlet Allocation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 221-245.
    5. Arun Advani & Bansi Malde, 2018. "Credibly Identifying Social Effects: Accounting For Network Formation And Measurement Error," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 1016-1044, September.
    6. Anastasia A. Zakolyukina, 2018. "How Common Are Intentional GAAP Violations? Estimates from a Dynamic Model," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 5-44, March.
    7. Lee D. Parker & James Guthrie & Simon Linacre, 2011. "The relationship between academic accounting research and professional practice," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(1), pages 5-14, January.
    8. Brian Rutherford, 2010. "The social scientific turn in UK financial accounting research: A philosophical and sociological analysis," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 149-171.
    9. Joachim Gassen & Kristina Schwedler, 2010. "The Decision Usefulness of Financial Accounting Measurement Concepts: Evidence from an Online Survey of Professional Investors and their Advisors," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 495-509.
    10. Baruch Lev, 2018. "The deteriorating usefulness of financial report information and how to reverse it," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(5), pages 465-493, July.
    11. Xuejing Xing & Shan Yan, 2019. "Accounting information quality and systematic risk," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 85-103, January.
    12. Brian Singleton-Green, 2010. "The Communication Gap: Why Doesn't Accounting Research Make a Greater Contribution to Debates on Accounting Policy?," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 129-145, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jana Skálová & Ladislav Mejzlík & Marcel Bareš, 2020. "Vykazování jiného výsledku hospodaření minulých let v českých společnostech [Reporting of Prior Period Errors and Changes in Accounting Policies by Czech Companies]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(3), pages 245-266.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Assaf Bar‐Hod & Ester Chen & Ilanit Gavious, 2021. "The economic consequences of fair value disclosures: a manifestation of the buried facts doctrine," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1363-1413, April.
    2. Soliman, Marwa & Ben-Amar, Walid, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility orientation and textual features of financial disclosures," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    3. Árni Claessen, 2021. "Relevance of Level 3 fair value disclosures and IFRS 13: a case study," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(4), pages 378-390, December.
    4. Arif, Salman & Marshall, Nathan T. & Schroeder, Joseph H. & Yohn, Teri Lombardi, 2019. "A growing disparity in earnings disclosure mechanisms: The rise of concurrently released earnings announcements and 10-Ks," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1).
    5. Nguyen, Phuong Thi Thuy & Kimura, Akihisa, 2023. "Disclosure characteristics of annual reports and information asymmetry: Evidence from foreign firms listed on the US stock exchange," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    6. Marie Herly & Nikolaj Niebuhr Lambertsen, 2023. "Restatement costs and reporting bias," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1-2), pages 91-117, January.
    7. Elżbieta Izabela Szczepankiewicz & Windham Eugene Loopesko & Farid Ullah, 2022. "A Model of Risk Information Disclosures in Non-Financial Corporate Reports of Socially Responsible Energy Companies in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-34, April.
    8. Richard Frankel & Jared Jennings & Joshua Lee, 2022. "Disclosure Sentiment: Machine Learning vs. Dictionary Methods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5514-5532, July.
    9. Duff, Angus & Marriott, Neil, 2017. "The teaching-research gestalt in accounting: A cluster analytic approach," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 413-428.
    10. deHaan, Ed & Song, Yang & Xie, Chloe & Zhu, Christina, 2021. "Obfuscation in mutual funds," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2).
    11. Pinto, Inês & Morais, Ana Isabel & Quick, Reiner, 2020. "The impact of the precision of accounting standards on the expanded auditor’s report in the European Union," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    12. Chychyla, Roman & Leone, Andrew J. & Minutti-Meza, Miguel, 2019. "Complexity of financial reporting standards and accounting expertise," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 226-253.
    13. Alex Kim & Maximilian Muhn & Valeri Nikolaev, 2023. "Bloated Disclosures: Can ChatGPT Help Investors Process Information?," Papers 2306.10224, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    14. Rjiba, Hatem & Saadi, Samir & Boubaker, Sabri & Ding, Xiaoya (Sara), 2021. "Annual report readability and the cost of equity capital," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    15. Nerissa C. Brown & Richard M. Crowley & W. Brooke Elliott, 2020. "What Are You Saying? Using topic to Detect Financial Misreporting," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 237-291, March.
    16. Blankespoor, Elizabeth & deHaan, Ed & Marinovic, Iván, 2020. "Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2).
    17. Michele Pizzo & Nicola Moscariello & Claudio Teodori & Monica Veneziani & Laura Rocca & Alberto Quagli & Elisa Roncagliolo, 2016. "Who Influences Whom? An Exploratory Analysis of the Interrelations between Accounting Research and the IASB?s Standard Setting Activity," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(1), pages 77-94.
    18. Quan Gan & Buhui Qiu, 2021. "The information content of 10‐K file size change," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 21(4), pages 1251-1285, December.
    19. Baruch Lev, 2018. "The deteriorating usefulness of financial report information and how to reverse it," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(5), pages 465-493, July.
    20. John Donovan & Jared Jennings & Kevin Koharki & Joshua Lee, 2021. "Measuring credit risk using qualitative disclosure," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 815-863, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:29-:d:219097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.