IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v5y2017i3p28-d106647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Soft Systems Approach to Knowledge Worker Productivity—Analysis of the Problem Situation

Author

Listed:
  • Helga Guðrún Óskarsdóttir

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Iceland, Reykjavik 101, Iceland)

  • Guðmundur Valur Oddsson

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Iceland, Reykjavik 101, Iceland)

Abstract

Low knowledge worker productivity is an important problem that needs to be addressed. Current research addressing this problem is fragmented and deals with different isolated elements of the problem. There is a need for a holistic approach to knowledge worker productivity. This paper takes the first steps of a holistic approach to knowledge worker productivity by using soft systems methodology to describe the problem situation. The main challenge of this research was the abstraction of the results from two literature reviews into simple rich pictures and specific root definitions to identify the fundamentals of knowledge worker productivity. The problem situation was explored from the perspective of two problem owners, the organization and the individual knowledge worker. The rich picture from the perspective of the organization highlighted that the organization must communicate what they perceive as value and create a work environment that promotes collaboration, encourages knowledge sharing, motivates and fulfills the needs of their knowledge workers. The rich picture from the perspective of the individual knowledge worker highlighted the fact that knowledge workers need to manage their personal resources, be effective and efficient to maximize their own productivity. This paper attempts to integrate these two perspectives into a holistic view.

Suggested Citation

  • Helga Guðrún Óskarsdóttir & Guðmundur Valur Oddsson, 2017. "A Soft Systems Approach to Knowledge Worker Productivity—Analysis of the Problem Situation," Economies, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-27, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:5:y:2017:i:3:p:28-:d:106647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/5/3/28/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/5/3/28/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chin-Hui Lai, 2015. "Applying knowledge flow mining to group recommendation methods for task-based groups," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(3), pages 545-563, March.
    2. Sharmila Jayasingam & Muhiniswari Govindasamy & Sharan Kaur Garib Singh, 2016. "Instilling affective commitment: insights on what makes knowledge workers want to stay," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(3), pages 266-288, March.
    3. Joseph Barjis & Ashish Gupta & Ramesh Sharda, 2011. "Knowledge work and communication challenges in networked enterprises," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 615-619, November.
    4. Gunasekaran, A. & Korukonda, A. R. & Virtanen, I. & Yli-Olli, P., 1994. "Improving productivity and quality in manufacturing organizations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 169-183, September.
    5. Alfonso Gambardella & Claudio Panico & Giovanni Valentini, 2015. "Strategic incentives to human capital," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 37-52, January.
    6. Duen-Ren Liu & Chin-Hui Lai & Ya-Ting Chen, 2012. "Document recommendations based on knowledge flows: A hybrid of personalized and group-based approaches," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(10), pages 2100-2117, October.
    7. Duen‐Ren Liu & Chin‐Hui Lai & Ya‐Ting Chen, 2012. "Document recommendations based on knowledge flows: A hybrid of personalized and group‐based approaches," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(10), pages 2100-2117, October.
    8. Yoram M. Kalman & Gilad Ravid, 2015. "Filing, piling, and everything in between: The dynamics of E-mail inbox management," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(12), pages 2540-2552, December.
    9. Keneley, Monica, 2007. "Supervising outworkers: the case of the AMP and the sale of industrial life insurance 1905-1940," Working Papers eco_2007_10, Deakin University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Małgorzata Ćwiek, 2021. "Social Facilitators of Specialist Knowledge Dispersion in the Digital Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Helga Guðrún Óskarsdóttir & Guðmundur Valur Oddsson & Jón Þór Sturluson & Rögnvaldur Jóhann Sæmundsson, 2021. "A Soft Systems Approach to Knowledge Worker Productivity: A Purposeful Activity Model for the Individual," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-26, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharon Belenzon & Ulya Tsolmon, 2016. "Market frictions and the competitive advantage of internal labor markets," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 1280-1303, July.
    2. David R. Williams & Betty S. Coffey & Carlton C. Young, 2018. "Human capital and agency effects on CEO compensation of IPO biopharmaceutical firms and the market’s response," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(2), pages 315-337, June.
    3. Andrea Morrison, 2018. "Spinoffs, parents, and institutions: Evidence from the Italian motorcycle industry," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1840, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Nov 2018.
    4. Leone, Maria Isabella & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio & Natalicchio, Angelo, 2022. "Boundary spanning through external technology acquisition: The moderating role of star scientists and upstream alliances," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    5. Gabriela Viale Pereira & Elsa Estevez & Diego Cardona & Carlos Chesñevar & Pablo Collazzo-Yelpo & Maria Alexandra Cunha & Eduardo Henrique Diniz & Alex Antonio Ferraresi & Frida Marina Fischer & Flúvi, 2020. "South American Expert Roundtable: Increasing Adaptive Governance Capacity for Coping with Unintended Side Effects of Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-47, January.
    6. Prithwiraj (Raj) Choudhury & Cirrus Foroughi & Barbara Larson, 2021. "Work‐from‐anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 655-683, April.
    7. Isabel Maria Bodas Freitas & Bart Verspagen, 2017. "The motivations, institutions and organization of university-industry collaborations in the Netherlands," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 379-412, July.
    8. Henry Sauermann, 2017. "Fire in the Belly? Employee Motives and Innovative Performance in Startups versus Established Firms," NBER Working Papers 23099, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Ashish Arora & Sharon Belenzon & Lia Sheer, 2017. "Back to Basics: Why do Firms Invest in Research?," NBER Working Papers 23187, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Sergio G Lazzarini & Luiz F Mesquita & Felipe Monteiro & Aldo Musacchio, 2021. "Leviathan as an inventor: An extended agency model of state-owned versus private firm invention in emerging and developed economies," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(4), pages 560-594, June.
    11. Heinz, Matthias & Khashabi, Pooyan & Zubanov, Nick & Kretschmer, Tobias & Friebel, Guido, 2017. "Heterogeneous Effects of Performance Pay with Market Competition: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment," CEPR Discussion Papers 12474, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    12. Thakur-Wernz, Pooja & Cantwell, John & Samant, Shantala, 2019. "Impact of international entry choices on the nature and type of innovation: Evidence from emerging economy firms from the Indian bio-pharmaceutical industry," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1-1.
    13. Sáenz-Royo, Carlos & Salas-Fumás, Vicente, 2014. "Long- and short-term efficiency in an automobile factory: An econometric case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 98-107.
    14. Cheng-Feng Cheng, 2020. "Revisiting Internal Marketing for the Determinants of Job (Dis)Satisfaction by Using Asymmetric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Christoph Grimpe & Wolfgang Sofka & Ulrich Kaiser, 2023. "Competing for digital human capital: The retention effect of digital expertise in MNC subsidiaries," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(4), pages 657-685, June.
    16. Fursov, Konstantin & Thurner, Thomas & Nefedova, Alena, 2017. "What user-innovators do that others don't: A study of daily practices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 153-160.
    17. Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Małgorzata Ćwiek, 2021. "Social Facilitators of Specialist Knowledge Dispersion in the Digital Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    18. Bowei Cai & Jiangmin Yang & Gengzhi Huang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics in Economic, Social, and Environmental Upgrading in China: Coupling Coordination and Influencing Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Gehringer, Agnieszka, 2015. "Uneven effects of financial liberalization on productivity growth in the EU: Evidence from a dynamic panel investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 334-346.
    20. Wacker, John G. & Yang, Chen-Lung & Sheu, Chwen, 2006. "Productivity of production labor, non-production labor, and capital: An international study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 863-872, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:5:y:2017:i:3:p:28-:d:106647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.