IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i4p628-d1378373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sh-DeepLabv3+: An Improved Semantic Segmentation Lightweight Network for Corn Straw Cover Form Plot Classification

Author

Listed:
  • Yueyong Wang

    (College of Information and Technology & Smart Agriculture Research Institute, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
    College of Engineering and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Xuebing Gao

    (College of Information and Technology & Smart Agriculture Research Institute, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Yu Sun

    (College of Information and Technology & Smart Agriculture Research Institute, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Yuanyuan Liu

    (College of Information and Technology & Smart Agriculture Research Institute, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Libin Wang

    (Changchun Agricultural Machinery Research Institute, Changchun 130052, China)

  • Mengqi Liu

    (College of Information and Technology & Smart Agriculture Research Institute, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)

Abstract

Straw return is one of the main methods for protecting black soil. Efficient and accurate straw return detection is important for the sustainability of conservation tillage. In this study, a rapid straw return detection method is proposed for large areas. An optimized Sh-DeepLabv3+ model based on the aforementioned detection method and the characteristics of straw return in Jilin Province was then used to classify plots into different straw return cover types. The model used Mobilenetv2 as the backbone network to reduce the number of model parameters, and the channel-wise feature pyramid module based on channel attention (CA-CFP) and a low-level feature fusion module (LLFF) were used to enhance the segmentation of the plot details. In addition, a composite loss function was used to solve the problem of class imbalance in the dataset. The results show that the extraction accuracy is optimal when a 2048 × 2048-pixel scale image is used as the model input. The total parameters of the improved model are 3.79 M, and the mean intersection over union (MIoU) is 96.22%, which is better than other comparative models. After conducting a calculation of the form–grade mapping relationship, the error value of the area prediction was found to be less than 8%. The results show that the proposed rapid straw return detection method based on Sh-DeepLabv3+ can provide greater support for straw return detection.

Suggested Citation

  • Yueyong Wang & Xuebing Gao & Yu Sun & Yuanyuan Liu & Libin Wang & Mengqi Liu, 2024. "Sh-DeepLabv3+: An Improved Semantic Segmentation Lightweight Network for Corn Straw Cover Form Plot Classification," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:628-:d:1378373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/4/628/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/4/628/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Buckland & Fredric Gey, 1994. "The relationship between Recall and Precision," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 45(1), pages 12-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Fan & Bales, Chris & Fleyeh, Hasan, 2021. "Night setback identification of district heat substations using bidirectional long short term memory with attention mechanism," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Matthew J. Jacobson, 2022. "Archaeological Evidence for Community Resilience and Sustainability: A Bibliometric and Quantitative Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Sanjay K. Arora & Alan L. Porter & Jan Youtie & Philip Shapira, 2013. "Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(1), pages 351-370, April.
    4. Zeqing Yang & Mingxuan Zhang & Yingshu Chen & Ning Hu & Lingxiao Gao & Libing Liu & Enxu Ping & Jung Il Song, 2024. "Surface defect detection method for air rudder based on positive samples," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 95-113, January.
    5. Fei Zhu & Quan Liu & Yuchen Fu & Bairong Shen, 2014. "Segmentation of Neuronal Structures Using SARSA (λ)-Based Boundary Amendment with Reinforced Gradient-Descent Curve Shape Fitting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Martin Wieland & Juan Gorraiz, 2020. "The rivalry between Bernini and Borromini from a scientometric perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1643-1663, November.
    7. Matteo Manca & Ludovico Boratto & Salvatore Carta, 2018. "Behavioral data mining to produce novel and serendipitous friend recommendations in a social bookmarking system," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 825-839, August.
    8. Ngoc Uyen Phuong Nguyen & Martin G. Moehrle, 2019. "Technological Drivers of Urban Innovation: A T-DNA Analysis Based on US Patent Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-26, December.
    9. Matteo Manca & Ludovico Boratto & Salvatore Carta, 0. "Behavioral data mining to produce novel and serendipitous friend recommendations in a social bookmarking system," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-15.
    10. Suner Aslı, 2019. "Clustering methods for single-cell RNA-sequencing expression data: performance evaluation with varying sample sizes and cell compositions," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Parraguez, Pedro & Škec, Stanko & e Carmo, Duarte Oliveira & Maier, Anja, 2020. "Quantifying technological change as a combinatorial process," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    12. Chris Davis & Graham Aid, 2022. "Machine learning‐assisted industrial symbiosis: Testing the ability of word vectors to estimate similarity for material substitutions," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 27-43, February.
    13. Madhusudanan Navinchandran & Michael E. Sharp & Michael P. Brundage & Thurston B. Sexton, 2022. "Discovering critical KPI factors from natural language in maintenance work orders," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 1859-1877, August.
    14. Izaskun Alvarez-Meaza & Enara Zarrabeitia-Bilbao & Rosa Maria Rio-Belver & Gaizka Garechana-Anacabe, 2020. "Fuel-Cell Electric Vehicles: Plotting a Scientific and Technological Knowledge Map," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, March.
    15. Bremer, Lucas & Heitmann, Mark & Schreiner, Thomas F., 2017. "When and how to infer heuristic consideration set rules of consumers," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 516-535.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:628-:d:1378373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.