IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i10p2023-d1262565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Can the Digital Economy Promote the Integration of Rural Industries—Taking China as an Example

Author

Listed:
  • Zepu Zhang

    (College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Chen Sun

    (College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Jing Wang

    (College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)

Abstract

The rapid development of China’s digital economy has promoted the digital transformation of Chinese society and become a new driving force for China’s social development. Furthermore, increasing farmers’ income is the central task of China’s “three rural issues” project, and the integrated development of primary, secondary, and tertiary rural industries is an important way to revitalize rural industries and broaden farmers’ income channels, so it is very important to promote the integrated development of rural industries. In the context of the rapid development of China’s digital economy, it is of great significance to study how the digital economy promotes the integration of rural industries. Therefore, this study analyzed how China’s digital economy promotes the integration of rural industries by using the panel data and regression models of 30 provinces (municipalities and districts) in China from 2011 to 2021. The results show that (1) there is a significant positive relationship between the development level of the digital economy and the level of rural–industrial integration and that the development of the digital economy promotes the process of rural–industrial integration; (2) intermediary effect analysis shows that as the digital economy promotes rural–industrial integration, scientific and technological innovation levels and rural human capital are important intermediary channels; and (3) spatial analysis shows that the development of the digital economy can not only promote the integration of rural industries in the province but also have a positive spatial spillover effect on neighboring provinces. Therefore, it is necessary to create a good atmosphere for the development of the digital economy, constantly promote the development of the digital economy, pay attention to scientific and technological innovation and rural talent training, and promote the integration and coordinated development of the digital economy and rural industries between regions in order to improve the level of rural–industrial integration and contribute to the rural revitalization strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Zepu Zhang & Chen Sun & Jing Wang, 2023. "How Can the Digital Economy Promote the Integration of Rural Industries—Taking China as an Example," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:10:p:2023-:d:1262565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/10/2023/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/10/2023/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yafei Wang & Huanhuan Huang & Jing Liu & Jin Ren & Tingting Gao & Xinrui Chen, 2023. "Rural Industrial Integration’s Impact on Agriculture GTFP Growth: Influence Mechanism and Empirical Test Using China as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Senyo, P.K. & Effah, John & Osabutey, Ellis L.C., 2021. "Digital platformisation as public sector transformation strategy: A case of Ghana's paperless port," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Opler, Tim & Pinkowitz, Lee & Stulz, Rene & Williamson, Rohan, 1999. "The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 3-46, April.
    4. Gautam Ahuja & Curba Morris Lampert, 2001. "Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6‐7), pages 521-543, June.
    5. Jinqi Su & Ke Su & Shubin Wang, 2021. "Does the Digital Economy Promote Industrial Structural Upgrading?—A Test of Mediating Effects Based on Heterogeneous Technological Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Piribauer, Philipp & Glocker, Christian & Krisztin, Tamás, 2023. "Beyond distance: The spatial relationships of European regional economic growth," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Lee, Hsiao-Hui & Yang, S. Alex & Kim, Kijin, 2019. "The Role of Fintech in Mitigating Information Friction in Supply Chain Finance," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 599, Asian Development Bank.
    8. Shuaitao Jiao & Qiubi Sun, 2021. "Digital Economic Development and Its Impact on Econimic Growth in China: Research Based on the Prespective of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Yichi Lai & Hao Yang & Feng Qiu & Zixin Dang & Yihan Luo, 2023. "Can Rural Industrial Integration Alleviate Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution? Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Han Zhang & Dongli Wu, 2022. "The Impact of Transport Infrastructure on Rural Industrial Integration: Spatial Spillover Effects and Spatio-Temporal Heterogeneity," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Senhua Huang & Lingming Chen, 2023. "The Impact of the Digital Economy on the Urban Total-Factor Energy Efficiency: Evidence from 275 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Genghua Tang & Hongxun Mai, 2022. "How Does Manufacturing Intelligentization Influence Innovation in China from a Nonlinear Perspective and Economic Servitization Background?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Li Chen & Yuanbo Zhang, 2023. "Does the Development of the Digital Economy Promote Common Prosperity?—Analysis Based on 284 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Hong Tang & Chaoyue Cai & Chunxiao Xu, 2022. "Does the Digital Economy Improve Urban Tourism Development? An Examination of the Chinese Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Jianfeng Guo & Kai Zhang & Kecheng Liu, 2022. "Exploring the Mechanism of the Impact of Green Finance and Digital Economy on China’s Green Total Factor Productivity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Qingjun Li & Shuliang Zhao, 2023. "The Impact of Digital Economy Development on Industrial Restructuring: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Liu, Jingling & Chen, Yanying & Liang, Feng Helen, 2023. "The effects of digital economy on breakthrough innovations: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    8. Senhua Huang & Feng Han & Lingming Chen, 2023. "Can the Digital Economy Promote the Upgrading of Urban Environmental Quality?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Chunhua Luo & Dianlong Wei & Wunhong Su & Jinjing Lu, 2023. "Association between Regional Digitalization and High-Quality Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Sherif El-Halaby & Hosam Abdelrasheed & Khaled Hussainey, 2021. "Corporate Cash Holdings and National Culture: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa Region," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, October.
    11. Henri A. Schildt & Markku V.J. Maula & Thomas Keil, 2005. "Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(4), pages 493-515, July.
    12. Tiziana La Rocca & Maurizio La Rocca & Francesco Fasano & Alfio Cariola, 2023. "Does a country's environmental policy affect the value of small and medium sized enterprises liquidity in the energy sector?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 277-290, January.
    13. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    14. Kuosmanen, Natalia & Valmari, Nelli, 2023. "Renewal of Companies Through Product Switching," ETLA Working Papers 104, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    15. Giordani, Paolo & Jacobson, Tor & Schedvin, Erik von & Villani, Mattias, 2014. "Taking the Twists into Account: Predicting Firm Bankruptcy Risk with Splines of Financial Ratios," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 1071-1099, August.
    16. Bruinshoofd Allard & Kool Clemens, 2002. "The Determinants of Corporate Liquidity in the Netherlands," Research Memorandum 014, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    17. Robin Döttling & Tomislav Ladika & Enrico Perotti, 2016. "The (Self-)Funding of Intangibles," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 16-093/IV, Tinbergen Institute.
    18. Zhang, Feng & Jiang, Guohua & Cantwell, John A., 2015. "Subsidiary exploration and the innovative performance of large multinational corporations," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 224-234.
    19. Avimanyu Datta, 2016. "Antecedents To Radical Innovations: A Longitudinal Look At Firms In The Information Technology Industry By Aggregation Of Patents," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(07), pages 1-31, October.
    20. Liu, Zhiqiang & Yan, Miao & Fan, Youqing & Chen, Liling, 2021. "Ascribed or achieved? The role of birth order on innovative behaviour in the workplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 480-492.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:10:p:2023-:d:1262565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.