IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i7p648-d591786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Plant Protection Products on Biochemical Markers in Honey Bees

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Murawska

    (Department of Environment Hygiene and Animal Welfare, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 25 C.K. Norwida st., 51-630 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Paweł Migdał

    (Department of Environment Hygiene and Animal Welfare, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 25 C.K. Norwida st., 51-630 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Adam Roman

    (Department of Environment Hygiene and Animal Welfare, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 25 C.K. Norwida st., 51-630 Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

Plant protection products (PPPs) are pesticides that protect crops and ornamental plants. PPPs include primarily insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides. Bees’ contact with PPPs can cause immediate death or, in sublethal dose, may affect their physiology and/or behavior. Understanding the effect of PPPs’ sublethal doses is especially important. Contact with a sublethal dose of PPPs generally allows the bee to return to the hive, which may expose the whole colony to the harmful substance. Biochemical changes may affect colony condition, health, and performance. Most of the research on the biochemical effects of PPP in honey bees focuses on insecticides and among them neonicotinoids (especially imidacloprid). The vast majority of research is carried out on Apis mellifera workers. A small part of the research has been conducted on drones and queens. Pesticides, including fungicides and herbicides, may alter antioxidant defense, detoxification, gene expression, and immune response of the bee. They affect the drones’ semen quality and metabolic rate of the queen. In this review, the biochemical effect of PPP products in the honey bee was examined, with a focus on the effect on cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, glutathione transferases, and carboxylesterases, which take part in toxin metabolism or the detoxification process. PPPs effects on the activity of glutathione peroxidase (GPX), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), proteases, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and phenoloxidase (PO) are also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Murawska & Paweł Migdał & Adam Roman, 2021. "Effects of Plant Protection Products on Biochemical Markers in Honey Bees," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:7:p:648-:d:591786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/7/648/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/7/648/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Desiderato Annoscia & Gennaro Di Prisco & Andrea Becchimanzi & Emilio Caprio & Davide Frizzera & Alberto Linguadoca & Francesco Nazzi & Francesco Pennacchio, 2020. "Neonicotinoid Clothianidin reduces honey bee immune response and contributes to Varroa mite proliferation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-7, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimitri Breda & Davide Frizzera & Giulia Giordano & Elisa Seffin & Virginia Zanni & Desiderato Annoscia & Christopher J. Topping & Franco Blanchini & Francesco Nazzi, 2022. "A deeper understanding of system interactions can explain contradictory field results on pesticide impact on honey bees," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Yinying Yang & Yuzheng Wu & Hexuan Long & Xuelin Ma & Kaavian Shariati & James Webb & Liang Guo & Yang Pan & Minglin Ma & Chao Deng & Peng Cao & Jing Chen, 2023. "Global honeybee health decline factors and potential conservation techniques," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(4), pages 855-875, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:7:p:648-:d:591786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.