IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i11p524-d440028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Row-Intercropping Maize ( Zea mays L.) with Biodiversity-Enhancing Flowering-Partners—Effect on Plant Growth, Silage Yield, and Composition of Harvest Material

Author

Listed:
  • Vanessa S. Schulz

    (Institute of Applied Agriculture, Nuertingen-Geislingen University, 72622 Nuertingen, Germany
    Center for Agricultural Technology Augustenberg, 76227 Karlsruhe, Germany)

  • Caroline Schumann

    (Center for Agricultural Technology Augustenberg, 76227 Karlsruhe, Germany)

  • Sebastian Weisenburger

    (Agricultural production and control, Agricultural Office Rastatt, 76437 Rastatt, Germany)

  • Maria Müller-Lindenlauf

    (Institute of Applied Agriculture, Nuertingen-Geislingen University, 72622 Nuertingen, Germany)

  • Kerstin Stolzenburg

    (Center for Agricultural Technology Augustenberg, 76227 Karlsruhe, Germany)

  • Kurt Möller

    (Center for Agricultural Technology Augustenberg, 76227 Karlsruhe, Germany)

Abstract

Maize cultivation faces some challenges, particularly in terms of low biodiversity in fields. Since maize is a highly efficient and economic crop, it is cultivated on large areas in Germany, with a high share in crop rotation, especially where cattle farming takes place. Such landscapes provide less habitat and food resources for small vertebrates and arthropods. Intercropping maize with flowering partners might have a positive effect on the environment and might promote biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems. Therefore, in two-year field experiments on three sites in south-western Germany, plants were tested for their suitability as intercropping partners in maize crops ( Medicago sativa , Melilotus officinalis , Vicia sativa , Tropaeolum majus , Cucurbita pepo , and Phaseolus vulgaris ). Almost all tested partners produced flowers, except M. officinalis . Intercropping maize with P. vulgaris or T. majus achieved comparable dry matter yields as sole maize, without changes in the biomass quality. For maize-intercropping, site adapted weed control and practicable sowing technique are mandatory, which already exist for P. vulgaris and T. majus . The study shows that intercropping maize with biodiversity-enhancing flowering partners can provide an applicable alternative to sole maize cropping and enhance biodiversity. The large production areas of maize have great potential for ecological improvements in agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanessa S. Schulz & Caroline Schumann & Sebastian Weisenburger & Maria Müller-Lindenlauf & Kerstin Stolzenburg & Kurt Möller, 2020. "Row-Intercropping Maize ( Zea mays L.) with Biodiversity-Enhancing Flowering-Partners—Effect on Plant Growth, Silage Yield, and Composition of Harvest Material," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:11:p:524-:d:440028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/11/524/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/11/524/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liina Nurk & Rüdiger Graß & Carola Pekrun & Michael Wachendorf, 2017. "Effect of Sowing Method and Weed Control on the Performance of Maize ( Zea mays L.) Intercropped with Climbing Beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Martin Schonhart & Thomas Schauppenlehner & Erwin Schmid & Andreas Muhar, 2011. "Analysing the maintenance and establishment of orchard meadows at farm and landscape levels applying a spatially explicit integrated modelling approach," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 115-143.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Wenda-Piesik & Agnieszka Synowiec, 2021. "Productive and Ecological Aspects of Mixed Cropping System," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-3, April.
    2. Anna Wenda-Piesik & Dariusz Piesik, 2020. "Diversity of Species and the Occurrence and Development of a Specialized Pest Population—A Review Article," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Csaba Centeri & Dénes Saláta & Alfréd Szilágyi & György Orosz & Szilárd Czóbel & Viktor Grónás & Ferenc Gyulai & Eszter Kovács & Ákos Pető & Julianna Skutai & Zsolt Biró & Ákos Malatinszky, 2021. "Selected Good Practices in the Hungarian Agricultural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Schönhart, Martin & Schauppenlehner, Thomas & Schmid, Erwin, 2014. "Integrated land use modelling of climate change impacts in two Austrian case study landscapes at field level," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182680, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Sabine Andert, 2021. "The Method and Timing of Weed Control Affect the Productivity of Intercropped Maize ( Zea mays L.) and Bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Simone Gingrich & Martin Schmid & Thomas Dirnböck & Iwona Dullinger & Rita Garstenauer & Veronika Gaube & Helmut Haberl & Martin Kainz & Daniel Kreiner & Renate Mayer & Michael Mirtl & Oliver Sass & T, 2016. "Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research in Practice: Lessons from Inter- and Transdisciplinary Research in the Austrian Eisenwurzen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Takamasa Nishizawa & Sonja Kay & Johannes Schuler & Noëlle Klein & Felix Herzog & Joachim Aurbacher & Peter Zander, 2022. "Ecological–Economic Modelling of Traditional Agroforestry to Promote Farmland Biodiversity with Cost-Effective Payments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Reidsma, Pytrik & Janssen, Sander & Jansen, Jacques & van Ittersum, Martin K., 2018. "On the development and use of farm models for policy impact assessment in the European Union – A review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 111-125.
    7. Schönhart, Martin & Sinabell, Franz & Schmid, Erwin, 2015. "Integrated Assessment of Climate Change Impacts on a Grassland Dominated Austrian Landscape," 150th Seminar, October 22-23, 2015, Edinburgh, Scotland 212675, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Daniel Villwock & Sabine Kurz & Jens Hartung & Maria Müller-Lindenlauf, 2022. "Effects of Stand Density and N Fertilization on the Performance of Maize ( Zea mays L.) Intercropped with Climbing Beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Schönhart, Martin & Schauppenlehner, Thomas & Kuttner, Michael & Kirchner, Mathias & Schmid, Erwin, 2016. "Climate change impacts on farm production, landscape appearance, and the environment: Policy scenario results from an integrated field-farm-landscape model in Austria," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 39-50.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:11:p:524-:d:440028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.