IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fma/fmanag/stowe97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Contingent-Claims Approach to the Inventory-Stocking Decision

Author

Listed:
  • John D. Stowe
  • Tie Su

Abstract

This paper presents option-pricing solutions to the inventory-stocking problem when demand is distributed discretely or continuously. The model readily incorporates inventory salvage values and stockout costs, and shows that option-pricing models can be used to determine the optimal stocking levels. The contingent-claims approach is a straightforward extension of the traditional inventory framework, and allows the technology of financial economics to be applied to this important class of assets. The conventional approach to inventory decisions relies on an expected profit-maximization criterion, which takes as its starting point a distribution of demand for the inventory item. The starting point for the contingent-claims approach presented here is to associate the demand for an inventory item to the price of an underlying state variable. Inventory payoffs depend on demand and the quantity stocked as well as the selling price, salvage value, and penalties for stockouts. To apply the contingent-claims approach, we construct a portfolio of options that replicates these inventory payoffs, value the portfolio, and then subtract the inventory investment to establish the net present value (NPV) of an inventory policy.

Suggested Citation

  • John D. Stowe & Tie Su, 1997. "A Contingent-Claims Approach to the Inventory-Stocking Decision," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 26(4), Winter.
    • Handle: RePEc:fma:fmanag:stowe97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lander, Diane M. & Pinches, George E., 1998. "Challenges to the Practical Implementation of Modeling and Valuing Real Options," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(3, Part 2), pages 537-567.
    2. Lin, Chun-Ta & Chen, Yee Ming, 2009. "Hedging strategic flexibility in the distribution optimization problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 826-837, August.
    3. Junmin Shi & Michael Katehakis & Benjamin Melamed, 2013. "Martingale methods for pricing inventory penalties under continuous replenishment and compound renewal demands," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 208(1), pages 593-612, September.
    4. William W. Wilson & Jesse Klebe, 2021. "Commodity procurement as contingent claims: Capturing risk and real options in flour milling," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(2), pages 348-370, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fma:fmanag:stowe97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Courtney Connors (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.