IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fli/journl/27800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The rise of intangible capital and labour market segmentation

Author

Listed:
  • Webster, E

Abstract

Labour is becoming an important asset vis-Ã -vis physical capital as the asset structures of firms change over time. The peculiarities of labour assets are that they appreciate with usage rather than depreciate. In contrast with physical capital, over-use leads to an increase in their value and under-use leads to an erosion. The more able or those considered to have the most potential are generally recruited to the asset sector of the labour market where positive work experiences are reinforcing while the less able or those considered to have less potential are excluded. Accordingly, the work experiences and skills of the labour force becomes more polarised.

Suggested Citation

  • Webster, E, 2001. "The rise of intangible capital and labour market segmentation," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 27(4), pages 258-271.
  • Handle: RePEc:fli:journl:27800
    Note: Webster, E., 2001. The rise of intangible capital and labour market segmentation. Australian Bulletin of Labour, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 258-271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/27800
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elizabeth Webster & Kelly Jarvis, 2003. "The Occupational Career Paths of Australian Tradesmen," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2003n14, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fli:journl:27800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rupali Saikia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nilflau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.