IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fis/journl/180410.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classification of Organizations’ Level of Glass Ceiling Within the Frame of Contingencies: A Comparative Example from Education and Health Sectors

Author

Listed:
  • Numan AKSOY

Abstract

Gender inequality encountered worldwide, also visibly exists in organizations as a problem. The entire global workforce bears signs of gender discrimination. Women occupy much fewer managerial positions when compared with men. Women work in organizations in low hierarchy and less responsible jobs, and are paid lower wages. The situation of women who are not given a chance for promotion in organizations, is depicted figuratively by a transparent barrier. The barriers, which invisibly hinder women from rising in the organizational levels are mentioned as glass ceiling in the literature. This study is an investigation into the way several chosen contingencies affect the perception of glass ceiling in women. The industry which the organization belongs, socialization provided by the family, whether the organization is in the public or private sector, women’s marital status, number of children, and the establishment date of the organization are the selected micro and macro contingencies. These contingencies show in which situations women’s perception of glass ceiling increase or decrease and thus provide a way for classification. In this research a comparative analysis of women’s perception of glass ceiling in the health and education sectors has been carried out. The above cited sectors have been chosen to make a comparison between a sector which can be traditionally accepted as women’s field and a sector which can be regarded as outside of this field. A glass ceiling questionnaire was answered by women in these sectors and the results supported the previous arguments of the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Numan AKSOY, 2018. "Classification of Organizations’ Level of Glass Ceiling Within the Frame of Contingencies: A Comparative Example from Education and Health Sectors," Fiscaoeconomia, Tubitak Ulakbim JournalPark (Dergipark), issue 4.
  • Handle: RePEc:fis:journl:180410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/545371
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gender Inequality; Glass Ceiling; Chosen Contingencies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • M19 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fis:journl:180410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emre Atsan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.dergipark.gov.tr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.