IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedker/y2013iqip33-57nv.98no.1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The low- and moderate- income population in recession and recovery: results from a new survey

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly D. Edmiston

Abstract

The worst recession in U.S. postwar history, starting in late 2007, confronted low- and moderate-income families and individuals with distinct challenges. To address the severe lack of data on the \\"LMI,\\" population, the Kansas City Fed launched its LMI Survey in 2009. ; Distributed to more than 700 organizations that provide services to the LMI population, the Survey elicits a wealth of qualitative reporting. It also produces quantitative data, including several quarterly indexes that track changes in LMI financial conditions over time. ; Edmiston summarizes insights from the Survey on how the recession and anemic recovery have affected job availability for the LMI population, affordable housing, access to credit and demand for basic services. The findings are useful for policymakers seeking to promote financial success among the 30 million U.S. families classified as LMI.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly D. Edmiston, 2013. "The low- and moderate- income population in recession and recovery: results from a new survey," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, vol. 98(Q I), pages 33-57.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedker:y:2013:i:qi:p:33-57:n:v.98no.1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.kansascityfed.org/documents/1626/The_Low-_and_Moderate-_Income_Population_in_Recession_and_Recovery_Results_From_A_New_.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kelly D. Edmiston, 2011. "Could restrictions on payday lending hurt consumers?," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, vol. 96(Q I).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. V. Kumar & Nita Umashankar & Kihyun Hannah Kim & Yashoda Bhagwat, 2014. "Assessing the Influence of Economic and Customer Experience Factors on Service Purchase Behaviors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 673-692, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James R. Barth & Jitka Hilliard & John S. Jahera & Kang B. Lee & Yanfei Sun, 2020. "Payday lending, crime, and bankruptcy: Is there a connection?," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 1159-1177, December.
    2. Dasgupta, Kabir & Mason, Brenden J., 2020. "The effect of interest rate caps on bankruptcy: Synthetic control evidence from recent payday lending bans," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    3. J. Brandon Bolen & Gregory Elliehausen & Thomas W. Miller, 2020. "Do Consumers Need More Protection From Small‐Dollar Lenders? Historical Evidence And A Roadmap For Future Research," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 58(4), pages 1577-1613, October.
    4. Mathieu R. Despard & Michal Grinstein-Weiss & Chunhui Ren & Shenyang Guo & Ramesh Raghavan, 2017. "Effects of a Tax-Time Savings Intervention on Use of Alternative Financial Services among Lower-Income Households," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 355-379, July.
    5. Josh Hanson & Fumiko Hayashi & Jesse Leigh Maniff, 2015. "Driver of choice? the cost of financial products for unbanked consumers," Research Working Paper RWP 15-15, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    6. Desai, Chintal A. & Elliehausen, Gregory, 2017. "The effect of state bans of payday lending on consumer credit delinquencies," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 94-107.
    7. Alycia Chin & Charles J. Romeo, 2022. "Repeat use of short‐term credit: The case of deposit advance products," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), pages 1705-1726, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedker:y:2013:i:qi:p:33-57:n:v.98no.1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zach Kastens (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbkcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.