IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxvy2022i3p235-243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Task Risk Assessment While Conducting Deck Works

Author

Listed:
  • Dorota Jarzabek
  • Kinga Drwiega
  • Milosz Tarkowski

Abstract

Purpose: This article provides an analysis of the risk assessment for a seafarer performing deck work. For this purpose, the hazards that negatively affect the increase in potential risk on the job and actions that can reduce them are presented. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study was prepared on the basis of own experience and skills in preparing risk assessments and information contained in the studies standardizing the principles of work at sea and risk assessment methods. Findings: For many years, OSH has been convinced that there are four fundamental pillars, to achive proper preparation and protection of the employee in the area of occupational health and safety. The first pillar is to develop appropriate habits in employees. The second is to control the working area, third pillar is proper maintenance of all kinds of documentation. The last pillar is Task risk assesment, whitch found to be the essential. Properly performed hepls to eliminate hazards that arise, and minimize those that remain unsolved. Practical Implications: Proper organization of the workplace, adequate training, providing personal protective equipment, following norms for hours of work are very important aspects. Originality/Value: Ensuring the safety of the employee while performing his duties is an essencial role of the employer.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorota Jarzabek & Kinga Drwiega & Milosz Tarkowski, 2022. "Task Risk Assessment While Conducting Deck Works," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 235-243.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxv:y:2022:i:3:p:235-243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3006/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tzannatos, Ernestos & Kokotos, Dimitris, 2009. "Analysis of accidents in Greek shipping during the pre- and post-ISM period," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 679-684, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wróbel, Krzysztof, 2021. "Searching for the origins of the myth: 80% human error impact on maritime safety," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Ek, Åsa & Runefors, Marcus & Borell, Jonas, 2014. "Relationships between safety culture aspects – A work process to enable interpretation," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 179-186.
    3. Wang, Likun & Yang, Zaili, 2018. "Bayesian network modelling and analysis of accident severity in waterborne transportation: A case study in China," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 277-289.
    4. Weiliang Qiao & Yu Liu & Xiaoxue Ma & Yang Liu, 2020. "Human Factors Analysis for Maritime Accidents Based on a Dynamic Fuzzy Bayesian Network," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(5), pages 957-980, May.
    5. Wen Cheng Lin, 2022. "Maritime Environment Assessment and Management Using through Balanced Scorecard by Using DEMATEL and ANP Technique," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-13, March.
    6. Bing Wu & Xinping Yan & Yang Wang & C. Guedes Soares, 2017. "An Evidential Reasoning‐Based CREAM to Human Reliability Analysis in Maritime Accident Process," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(10), pages 1936-1957, October.
    7. Constantine Chlomoudis & Petros A. Kostagiolas, 2013. "Integrating Information Services for Managing Regulations in International Maritime Transportation," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 63(3-4), pages 128-136, July.
    8. Angelos Pantouvakis & Maria Karakasnaki, 2016. "An empirical assessment of ISM Code effectiveness on performance: the role of ISO certification," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(7), pages 874-886, October.
    9. Xiaolong Wang & Boling Zhang & Xu Zhao & Lulu Wang & Ruipeng Tong, 2020. "Exploring the Underlying Causes of Chinese Eastern Star, Korean Sewol, and Thai Phoenix Ferry Accidents by Employing the HFACS-MA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Conghua Xue & Lijun Tang, 2019. "Organisational support and safety management: A study of shipboard safety supervision," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 30(4), pages 549-565, December.
    11. Bye, Rolf J. & Aalberg, Asbjørn L., 2018. "Maritime navigation accidents and risk indicators: An exploratory statistical analysis using AIS data and accident reports," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 174-186.
    12. Yue Jiao & Maxim A. Dulebenets & Yui-yip Lau, 2020. "Cruise Ship Safety Management in Asian Regions: Trends and Future Outlook," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-15, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    TRA; task risk assessment; deck works; safety.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R40 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - General
    • R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxv:y:2022:i:3:p:235-243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.