IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/ijebaa/vviiiy2020i4p223-237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulation Concepts for Disruptive Innovation: New Policy Perspective for Online Transportation Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Mukti Fajar
  • Dyah Mutiarin
  • Reni Budi Setianingrum

Abstract

Purpose: The research aims to examine the legal concepts of business that interfere with innovation in legal competition in transportation and the management model of online transportation industry governance. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research method uses normative legal research with laws, theories, and legal principles through library research. To complete the data, this research also conducts interviews with experts, stakeholders and government officials. Findings: The findings reveal that first, the disruptive innovations in the online transportation business do not conflict with the principles of business competition law, but it needs to be arranged differently. Second, the online transportation policy model requests a combination of self-regulation and strict regulatory policies. The mixture will protect unhealthy businesses, providing consumer protection and safety, and security providers in online transportation business. Practical implications: The combination model of self-regulation policy and hard regulation policy may bring innovation in online transportation regulation policies. Originality/Value: This research proposes feasible policies in regulating the business of conventional transportation and integrated online transportation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mukti Fajar & Dyah Mutiarin & Reni Budi Setianingrum, 2020. "Regulation Concepts for Disruptive Innovation: New Policy Perspective for Online Transportation Industry," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 223-237.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:viii:y:2020:i:4:p:223-237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijeba.com/journal/582/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jovan Pejkovski & Artur Ribaj, 2019. "Economic Function and Financial Literacy of Modern Family," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 5, May - Aug.
    2. Christopher Marsden, 2008. "Beyond Europe: The Internet, Regulation, and Multistakeholder Governance—Representing the Consumer Interest?," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 115-132, March.
    3. Grajzl, Peter & Murrell, Peter, 2007. "Allocating lawmaking powers: Self-regulation vs government regulation," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 520-545, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sih Yuliana Wahyuningtyas, 2019. "Self-regulation of online platform and competition policy challenges: A case study on Go-Jek," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 20(1), pages 33-53, March.
    2. Cave, Jonathan & Marsden, Christopher, 2008. "Quis custodiet ipsos custodies in the Internet: self-regulation as a threat and a promise," MPRA Paper 83193, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Jiwon Lee & Inwon Kang & Joseph Stanfield, 2017. "Coercive Tactics and Web Advertising Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Baule, Rainer & Münchhalfen, Patrick & Shkel, David & Tallau, Christian, 2023. "Fair-washing in the market for structured retail products? Voluntary self-regulation versus government regulation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    5. Chang Ma, 2020. "Self-regulation versus government regulation: an externality view," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 166-183, December.
    6. Camille Chaserant & Sophie Harnay, 2013. "The regulation of quality in the market for legal services: Taking the heterogeneity of legal services seriously," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 10(2), pages 267-291, August.
    7. Lampe, Ryan & McRae, Shaun, 2021. "Self-regulation vs state regulation: Evidence from cinema age restrictions," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    8. David López Jiménez & Eduardo Carlos Dittmar & Jenny Patricia Vargas Portillo, 2021. "Self-regulation of Sexist Digital Advertising: From Ethics to Law," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(4), pages 709-718, July.
    9. Grajzl Peter & Dimitrova-Grajzl Valentina, 2009. "The Choice in the Lawmaking Process: Legal Transplants vs. Indigenous Law," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 615-660, November.
    10. Bos, J.W.B. & Contreras, M.G. & Kleimeier, S., 2016. "Self-regulation in collaborative environments : the case of the equator principles in banking," Research Memorandum 007, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    11. Contreras, Gabriela & Bos, Jaap W.B. & Kleimeier, Stefanie, 2019. "Self-regulation in sustainable finance: The adoption of the Equator Principles," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 306-324.
    12. Dimitrova-Grajzl, Valentina & Grajzl, Peter & Zajc, Katarina, 2014. "Understanding modes of civil case disposition: Evidence from Slovenian courts," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 924-939.
    13. Grajzl, Peter & Baniak, Andrzej, 2009. "Industry self-regulation, subversion of public institutions, and social control of torts," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 360-374, December.
    14. Beattie, Vivien & Fearnley, Stella & Hines, Tony, 2010. "Factors Affecting Audit Quality in the 2007 UK Regulatory Environment: Perceptions of Chief Financial Officers, Audit Committee Chairs and Audit Engagement Partners," SIRE Discussion Papers 2012-29, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    15. Ramón A. Feenstra & Elsa González Esteban, 2019. "Autocontrol: A Critical Study of Achievements and Challenges in the Pursuit of Ethical Advertising Through an Advertising Self-Regulation System," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 341-354, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Disruptive innovation; online transportation; business competition; self regulation.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D41 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Perfect Competition
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:viii:y:2020:i:4:p:223-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijeba.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.