This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Conditional cash transfers in Brazil, Chile and Mexico: impacts upon inequality

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Sergei Soares (Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada)
Rafael Guerreiro Osório (International Poverty Centre, UNDP)
Fábio Veras Soares (Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada)
Marcelo Medeiros (Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada)
Eduardo Zepeda (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

We decompose changes in the Gini coefficient to investigate whether the Conditional Cash Tranfers (CCT) have had an inequality reducing effect in three Latin American countries: Brazil, Mexico and Chile. We conclude that CCT programs helped reducing inequality between the mid-1990s and the mid-2000s. The share of total income represented by the CCTs is very small, less than 1%. But as their targeting is outstanding, the equalising impact of CCTs was responsible for about 21% of the fall in Brazilian and Mexican inequality figures In Chile the effect was responsible for around 15% of the reduction.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://revistas.colmex.mx/revistas/12_p/art_12_1213_9230.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Article provided by El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos in its journal Estudios Económicos.

Volume (Year): - (2009)
Issue (Month): Special issue ()
Pages: 207-224
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:emx:esteco:v:-:y:2009:i:special:p:207-224

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.colmex.mx/centros/cee/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Rocío Contreras).

Related research
Keywords: Conditional Cash Transfers; CCT; inequality; Gini decomposition;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Hoddinott, John & Skoufias, Emmanual, 2003. "The impact of Progresa on food consumption," FCND briefs 150, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Marcelo Medeiros & Tatiana Britto & Fabio Veras Soares, 2008. "Targeted Cash Transfer Programmes in Brazil: BPC and the Bolsa Familia," Working Papers 46, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth. [Downloadable!]
  2. Ricardo N. Bebczuk, 2008. "Financial Inclusion in Latin America and the Caribbean: Review and Lessons," Working Papers 0068, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Springer Verlag was the first commercial publisher to be listed on RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-6.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.