IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/sefpps/v31y2014i1p106-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of discretionary loan loss provisions by Islamic banks and conventional banks in the Middle East region

Author

Listed:
  • Hakim Ben Othman
  • Hounaida Mersni

Abstract

Purpose - – The purpose of this paper is to study earnings management practices of Islamic banks and conventional banks in the Middle East region. First, the authors examine factors that may influence Islamic banks managers' use of discretion in reporting loan loss provisions (LLP). Second, the authors investigate differences that may exist between Islamic banks and non-Islamic banks in terms of discretionary loan loss provisions (DLLP) used to manipulate accounting earnings. Design/methodology/approach - – This empirical study uses an unbalanced panel data of 21 Islamic banks, 18 conventional banks with Islamic windows and 33 conventional banks, from seven Middle East countries during a period that ranges from 2000 to 2008. The authors use a two-stage approach in order to examine factors that may influence the use of discretion by Islamic banks' managers. Findings - – The empirical results reveal that Islamic banks use DLLP for both earnings and capital management. External financing is also found to be a determinant of DLLP. Additional findings show no significant differences among Islamic banks, conventional banks with Islamic windows and conventional banks in using DLLP. These three groups of banks behave similarly in terms of discretion based on DLLP. Practical implications - – The findings are potentially useful for regulators, auditors and investors. This study provides regulators with insights to strengthen their financial regulations in order to improve accounting quality. In addition, it helps auditors when considering the provisioning policies adopted by banks in order to detect specific manipulations of accounting earnings. The results may also help investors to focus on the impact of managerial discretion on accounting earnings for evaluation purposes. Originality/value - – This study contributes to the literature on Islamic banking. On the one hand, it extends prior research by examining the discretionary component of LLP, instead of being restricted to total LLP. On the other hand, it compares the use of discretion among three groups of banks: full Islamic banks, conventional banks with Islamic windows and full conventional banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Hakim Ben Othman & Hounaida Mersni, 2014. "The use of discretionary loan loss provisions by Islamic banks and conventional banks in the Middle East region," Studies in Economics and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(1), pages 106-128, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:sefpps:v:31:y:2014:i:1:p:106-128
    DOI: 10.1108/SEF-02-2013-0017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SEF-02-2013-0017/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SEF-02-2013-0017/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/SEF-02-2013-0017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lassoued, Naima & Attia, Mouna Ben Rejeb & Sassi, Houda, 2018. "Earnings management in islamic and conventional banks: Does ownership structure matter? Evidence from the MENA region," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 85-105.
    2. Mirza, Nawazish & Rahat, Birjees & Reddy, Krishna, 2015. "Business dynamics, efficiency, asset quality and stability: The case of financial intermediaries in Pakistan," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 358-363.
    3. Malik, Amina & Butt, Babar Zaheer & Din, Shahab Ud & Aziz, Haroon, 2020. "Impact of Earnings Variability and Regulatory Measures on Income Smoothening in Islamic Banks — Evidence from an Emerging Market," Public Finance Quarterly, Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 65(3), pages 397-410.
    4. Alam, Nafis & Ramachandran, Jayalakshmy & Nahomy, Aisha Homy, 2020. "The impact of corporate governance and agency effect on earnings management – A test of the dual banking system," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    5. Giuseppe Di Martino & Grazia Dicuonzo & Graziana Galeone & Vittorio Dell’Atti, 2017. "Does the New European Banking Regulation discourage Earnings Management?," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(10), pages 45-56, October.
    6. Ozili, Peterson K, 2022. "Determinants of bank income smoothing using loan loss provisions in the United Kingdom," MPRA Paper 112047, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Zainuldin, Mohd Haniff & Lui, Tze Kiat, 2020. "Earnings management in financial institutions: A comparative study of Islamic banks and conventional banks in emerging markets," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    8. Hindah Mustika & Anis Eliyana & Tri Siwi Agustina & Aisha Anwar, 2022. "Testing the Determining Factors of Knowledge Sharing Behavior," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, February.
    9. Salem, Rami & Usman, Muhammad & Ezeani, Ernest, 2021. "Loan loss provisions and audit quality: Evidence from MENA Islamic and conventional banks," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 345-359.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:sefpps:v:31:y:2014:i:1:p:106-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.