IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/caerpp/caer-07-2022-0156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the impact of Russia–Ukraine crisis on food security and trade pattern: evidence from a structural general equilibrium trade model

Author

Listed:
  • Fan Feng
  • Ningyuan Jia
  • Faqin Lin

Abstract

Purpose - Considering the importance of Russia and Ukraine in agriculture, the authors quantify the potential impact of the Russia–Ukraine conflict on food output, trade, prices and food security for the world. Design/methodology/approach - The authors mainly use the quantitative and structural multi-country and multi-sector general equilibrium trade model to analyze the potential impacts of the conflict on the global food trade pattern and security. Findings - First, the authors found that the conflict would lead to soaring agricultural prices, decreasing trade volume and severe food insecurity especially for countries that rely heavily on grain imports from Ukraine and Russia, such as Egypt and Turkey. Second, major production countries such as the United States and Canada may even benefit from the conflict. Third, restrictions on upstream energy and fertilizer will amplify the negative effects of food insecurity. Originality/value - This study analyzed the effect of Russia–Ukraine conflict on global food security based on sector linkages and the quantitative general equilibrium trade framework. With a clearer demonstration of the influence about the inherent mechanism based on fewer parameters compared with traditional Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) models, the authors showed integrated impacts of the conflict on food output, trade, prices and welfare across sectors and countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan Feng & Ningyuan Jia & Faqin Lin, 2023. "Quantifying the impact of Russia–Ukraine crisis on food security and trade pattern: evidence from a structural general equilibrium trade model," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(2), pages 241-258, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:caerpp:caer-07-2022-0156
    DOI: 10.1108/CAER-07-2022-0156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CAER-07-2022-0156/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CAER-07-2022-0156/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/CAER-07-2022-0156?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rosalia Facendola & Giovanni Ottomano Palmisano & Annalisa De Boni & Claudio Acciani & Rocco Roma, 2023. "Profiling Citizens on Perception of Key Factors of Food Security: An Application of K-Means Cluster Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Wei-Xing Zhou & Yun-Shi Dai & Kiet Tuan Duong & Peng-Fei Dai, 2023. "The impact of the Russia-Ukraine conflict on the extreme risk spillovers between agricultural futures and spots," Papers 2310.16850, arXiv.org.
    3. Carla Zarb? & Gioacchino Pappalardo & Roberta Selvaggi & Biagio Pecorino, 2023. "The EU agri-food system in the recent crisis scenarios," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(3), pages 87-107.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Russia–Ukraine conflict; Food security; Agriculture commodity price; Agriculture trade; Welfare; F17; Q17;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F17 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Forecasting and Simulation
    • Q17 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agriculture in International Trade

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:caerpp:caer-07-2022-0156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.