IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ekm/repojs/v3y1983i4id1941.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tecnologia e campesinato: o caso brasileiro

Author

Listed:
  • José Graziano da Silva
  • Angela A. Kageyama
  • Devancyr A. Romão

Abstract

This paper proposes a critical evaluation of the technological standards recently imposed on Brazilian agriculture and suggests alternative strategies for technology policies for small producers. Initially, a diagnosis is made of the situation and characteristics of the peasant sector in Brazil and the impacts of agricultural modernization on this sector of agri-culture. In this diagnosis, there is also a concern to reveal that the institutional organization for the generation and diffusion of agricultural technology by the public sector tends to reinforce the penalties imposed by the economic system on the small agricultural producers. The last part of this work deals with an analysis of possible modernization strategies for small producers. In this part, there is a concern to reintroduce the “technological issue”, revealing that a discussion of the appropriation of the results of increased produc-tivity brought about by modernization is more important than technological adequacy problems.

Suggested Citation

  • José Graziano da Silva & Angela A. Kageyama & Devancyr A. Romão, 1983. "Tecnologia e campesinato: o caso brasileiro," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 3(4).
  • Handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:3:y:1983:i:4:id:1941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/1941/1927
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Medina, Gabriel & Almeida, Camila & Novaes, Evandro & Godar, Javier & Pokorny, Benno, 2015. "Development Conditions for Family Farming: Lessons From Brazil," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 386-396.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:3:y:1983:i:4:id:1941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brazilian Journal of Political Economy (Brazil) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org/repojs/index.php/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.