IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ekm/repojs/v35y2015i3p576-600id240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deindustrialization and investment in infrastructure as a conciliatory alternative for the Brazilian industrial policy

Author

Listed:
  • Marwil Dávila-Fernández

Abstract

The poor performance of the Brazilian industry in the post-crisis 2008, resumed the debate surrounding the need of an industrial policy outline. Accordingly, and given its characteristics, the investment in infrastructure figures a conciliatory and efficient alternative in the task of returning competitiveness to this sector. Thus, this paper aims to deepen the debate on the issue of deindustrialization of the Brazilian economy and contribute to the discussion on the functionality of infrastructure investment as an instrument of industrial policy, emphasizing its conciliator character in what we call here a base industrial policy. JEL Classification: O21; O25.

Suggested Citation

  • Marwil Dávila-Fernández, 2015. "Deindustrialization and investment in infrastructure as a conciliatory alternative for the Brazilian industrial policy," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 35(3), pages 576-600.
    • Handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:35:y:2015:i:3:p:576-600:id:240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/240/230
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    deindustrialization; infrastructure investment; industrial policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O21 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Planning Models; Planning Policy
    • O25 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Industrial Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:35:y:2015:i:3:p:576-600:id:240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brazilian Journal of Political Economy (Brazil) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org/repojs/index.php/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.