IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ekm/repojs/v23y2003i4p604-621id918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Keynesian to Schumpeterian State

Author

Listed:
  • Wagner Leal Arienti

Abstract

This critique aims to introduce Jessop’s hypotheses on post-Fordist state. Based on regulation approach, the Keynesian and welfare state is taken as the ideal type state that underpinned the Fordist accumulation regime until the 1970s. In order to response to the crises of Fordism and Keynesian state, new policies have been directed to reform state apparatus and policies. The Jessop’s main hypothesis is that a “hollowed-out” Schumpeterian workfare state is the best form to support the post-Fordist transition. In spite of pointing out some problems, the paper calls attention for the heuristic values of Jessop’s hypotheses on post-Fordist state and their potentialities to guide case studies. JEL Classification: P1; P16.

Suggested Citation

  • Wagner Leal Arienti, 2003. "From Keynesian to Schumpeterian State," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 23(4), pages 604-621.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:23:y:2003:i:4:p:604-621:id:918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/918/2129
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Capitalist state; history of contemporary capitalism; economic and social policies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • P1 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:23:y:2003:i:4:p:604-621:id:918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brazilian Journal of Political Economy (Brazil) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org/repojs/index.php/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.