IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v87y2016icp149-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solving an integrated operational transportation planning problem with forwarding limitations

Author

Listed:
  • Ziebuhr, Mario
  • Kopfer, Herbert

Abstract

In integrated operational transportation planning (IOTP) problems, the traditional vehicle routing problem is extended by using external resources for the fulfillment of transportation requests. IOTP is getting more complex when the choice of the fulfillment mode is limited for some requests. In this paper, an existing column generation-based heuristic for IOTP is extended by two strategies for handling forwarding limitations. The computational experiments indicate that one of the extended versions of the heuristic outperforms all previous approaches in literature. Further on, the impact of forwarding limitations on different location structures and on the size of the private fleet is analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziebuhr, Mario & Kopfer, Herbert, 2016. "Solving an integrated operational transportation planning problem with forwarding limitations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 149-166.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:87:y:2016:i:c:p:149-166
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2016.01.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554516000065
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2016.01.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John G. Klincewicz & Hanan Luss & Martha G. Pilcher, 1990. "Fleet Size Planning when Outside Carrier Services Are Available," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 169-182, August.
    2. Stefan Ropke & David Pisinger, 2006. "An Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search Heuristic for the Pickup and Delivery Problem with Time Windows," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 455-472, November.
    3. Min, Hokey, 1998. "A personal-computer assisted decision support system for private versus common carrier selection," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 229-241, September.
    4. Andreas Stenger & Daniele Vigo & Steffen Enz & Michael Schwind, 2013. "An Adaptive Variable Neighborhood Search Algorithm for a Vehicle Routing Problem Arising in Small Package Shipping," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 64-80, February.
    5. M A Krajewska & H Kopfer & G Laporte & S Ropke & G Zaccour, 2008. "Horizontal cooperation among freight carriers: request allocation and profit sharing," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(11), pages 1483-1491, November.
    6. Côté, Jean-François & Potvin, Jean-Yves, 2009. "A tabu search heuristic for the vehicle routing problem with private fleet and common carrier," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(2), pages 464-469, October.
    7. Chu, Ching-Wu, 2005. "A heuristic algorithm for the truckload and less-than-truckload problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(3), pages 657-667, September.
    8. Marius M. Solomon, 1987. "Algorithms for the Vehicle Routing and Scheduling Problems with Time Window Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 254-265, April.
    9. J-Y Potvin & M-A Naud, 2011. "Tabu search with ejection chains for the vehicle routing problem with private fleet and common carrier," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(2), pages 326-336, February.
    10. Song, Jiongjiong & Regan, A C, 2003. "An Auction Based Collaborative Carrier Network," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2g88d8vc, University of California Transportation Center.
    11. Lotte Verdonck & AN Caris & Katrien Ramaekers & Gerrit K. Janssens, 2013. "Collaborative Logistics from the Perspective of Road Transportation Companies," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 700-719, November.
    12. Liu, Ran & Jiang, Zhibin & Liu, Xiao & Chen, Feng, 2010. "Task selection and routing problems in collaborative truckload transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1071-1085, November.
    13. Wang, Xin & Kopfer, Herbert & Gendreau, Michel, 2014. "Operational transportation planning of freight forwarding companies in horizontal coalitions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 1133-1141.
    14. Moustapha Diaby & R. Ramesh, 1995. "The Distribution Problem with Carrier Service: A Dual Based Penalty Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 24-35, February.
    15. Ozlem Ergun & Gultekin Kuyzu & Martin Savelsbergh, 2007. "Reducing Truckload Transportation Costs Through Collaboration," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 206-221, May.
    16. Bolduc, Marie-Claude & Renaud, Jacques & Boctor, Fayez, 2007. "A heuristic for the routing and carrier selection problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 926-932, December.
    17. Richa Agarwal & Özlem Ergun, 2010. "Network Design and Allocation Mechanisms for Carrier Alliances in Liner Shipping," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1726-1742, December.
    18. Chris Clifton & Ananth Iyer & Richard Cho & Wei Jiang & Murat Kantarc{i}ou{g}lu & Jaideep Vaidya, 2008. "An Approach to Securely Identifying Beneficial Collaboration in Decentralized Logistics Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 108-125, January.
    19. Krajewska, Marta Anna & Kopfer, Herbert, 2009. "Transportation planning in freight forwarding companies: Tabu search algorithm for the integrated operational transportation planning problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 741-751, September.
    20. Berger, Susanne & Bierwirth, Christian, 2010. "Solutions to the request reassignment problem in collaborative carrier networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 627-638, September.
    21. M-C Bolduc & J Renaud & F Boctor & G Laporte, 2008. "A perturbation metaheuristic for the vehicle routing problem with private fleet and common carriers," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(6), pages 776-787, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacob, Jonathan & Buer, Tobias, 2016. "Impact of Non-truthful Bidding on Transport Coalition Profits," Bremen Computational Logistics Group Working Papers 3, University of Bremen, Computational Logistics Junior Research Group.
    2. Chen, Haoxun, 2016. "Combinatorial clock-proxy exchange for carrier collaboration in less than truck load transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 152-172.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gahm, Christian & Brabänder, Christian & Tuma, Axel, 2017. "Vehicle routing with private fleet, multiple common carriers offering volume discounts, and rental options," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 192-216.
    2. Wang, Xin & Kopfer, Herbert & Gendreau, Michel, 2014. "Operational transportation planning of freight forwarding companies in horizontal coalitions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 1133-1141.
    3. Li, Junsong & Rong, Gang & Feng, Yiping, 2015. "Request selection and exchange approach for carrier collaboration based on auction of a single request," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 23-39.
    4. Zhenzhen Zhang & Zhixing Luo & Hu Qin & Andrew Lim, 2019. "Exact Algorithms for the Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows and Combinatorial Auction," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 427-441, March.
    5. Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F., 2018. "Collaborative vehicle routing: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 1-12.
    6. Nassim Mrabti & Nadia Hamani & Laurent Delahoche, 2022. "A Comprehensive Literature Review on Sustainable Horizontal Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-38, September.
    7. Lai, Minghui & Cai, Xiaoqiang & Hu, Qian, 2017. "An iterative auction for carrier collaboration in truckload pickup and delivery," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 60-80.
    8. Annelieke C. Baller & Said Dabia & Wout E. H. Dullaert & Daniele Vigo, 2020. "The Vehicle Routing Problem with Partial Outsourcing," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 1034-1052, July.
    9. Said Dabia & David Lai & Daniele Vigo, 2019. "An Exact Algorithm for a Rich Vehicle Routing Problem with Private Fleet and Common Carrier," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 986-1000, July.
    10. Paul, Joydeep & Agatz, Niels & Spliet, Remy & Koster, René De, 2019. "Shared Capacity Routing Problem − An omni-channel retail study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 731-739.
    11. Chabot, Thomas & Bouchard, Florence & Legault-Michaud, Ariane & Renaud, Jacques & Coelho, Leandro C., 2018. "Service level, cost and environmental optimization of collaborative transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-14.
    12. Liu, Ran & Jiang, Zhibin, 2012. "The close–open mixed vehicle routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 349-360.
    13. Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F. & Sörensen, Kenneth, 2020. "Pushing frontiers in auction-based transport collaborations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    14. Andreas Stenger & Daniele Vigo & Steffen Enz & Michael Schwind, 2013. "An Adaptive Variable Neighborhood Search Algorithm for a Vehicle Routing Problem Arising in Small Package Shipping," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 64-80, February.
    15. Bertazzi, Luca & Bosco, Adamo & Laganà, Demetrio, 2015. "Managing stochastic demand in an Inventory Routing Problem with transportation procurement," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 112-121.
    16. Fernández, Elena & Roca-Riu, Mireia & Speranza, M. Grazia, 2018. "The Shared Customer Collaboration Vehicle Routing Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 1078-1093.
    17. Lotte Verdonck & Katrien Ramaekers & Benoît Depaire & An Caris & Gerrit K. Janssens, 2019. "Analysing the Effect of Partner Characteristics on the Performance of Horizontal Carrier Collaborations," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 583-609, June.
    18. J-Y Potvin & M-A Naud, 2011. "Tabu search with ejection chains for the vehicle routing problem with private fleet and common carrier," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(2), pages 326-336, February.
    19. Lai, Minghui & Cai, Xiaoqiang & Li, Xiang, 2017. "Mechanism design for collaborative production-distribution planning with shipment consolidation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 137-159.
    20. Lyu, Xiaohui & Chen, Haoxun & Wang, Nengmin & Yang, Zhen, 2019. "A multi-round exchange mechanism for carrier collaboration in less than truckload transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 38-59.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:87:y:2016:i:c:p:149-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.