IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v33y1999i3-4p275-289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capacity at unsignalized two-stage priority intersections

Author

Listed:
  • Brilon, Werner
  • Wu, Ning

Abstract

The subject of this paper is the capacity of minor-street traffic movements across major divided four-lane roadways (and other roads with two separate carriageways) at unsignalized intersections. The center of the intersection, corresponding to the width of the median, often provides room for drivers who have crossed the first half of the major road to stop before proceeding across the second major traffic stream. This situation, which is common with multilane major streets, is called two-stage priority. Here the capacity for minor-street through traffic is larger than at intersections without such a central storage space. These wider intersections provide an additional capacity that cannot be evaluated by conventional capacity calculation models. An analytical theory is presented for the estimation of capacity under two-stage priority conditions. It is based on an approach by Harders, although major improvements were necessary to match the results with realistic conditions. In addition to analytical theory, simulations were performed that enable an analysis under more realistic conditions. The result is a set of equations that compute the capacity for a minor-street through-traffic movement in the two-stage priority situation. ©

Suggested Citation

  • Brilon, Werner & Wu, Ning, 1999. "Capacity at unsignalized two-stage priority intersections," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(3-4), pages 275-289, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:33:y:1999:i:3-4:p:275-289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965-8564(98)00047-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:33:y:1999:i:3-4:p:275-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.