IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v178y2023ics0965856423003063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shipping alliances under an unexpected shock: Effects on market volatility and social welfare

Author

Listed:
  • Itoh, Ryo
  • Zhang, Anming

Abstract

This paper analyzes the impact of container shipping alliances on the market stability of prices and volumes in the event of an unexpected shock. Given two complementary or substitutable ports in which oligopolistic liners are operating, an alliance between complementary liners, referred to as “global alliance”, enhances their strategic complementarity, which makes shocks more easily propagating among ports and increases volatility of the price and volumes of shipping services. Furthermore, due to incomplete adjustment of production facilities of shippers facing unexpected shocks, the shipping demand in the short term is less elastic than that in the long term. It is shown that the increased market volatility of global alliance causes a greater decline in shippers' benefit under a shock through i) shippers' inefficient investment and ii) an excessive price increase in transportation services, while the liners’ profit may even increase owing to the second effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Itoh, Ryo & Zhang, Anming, 2023. "Shipping alliances under an unexpected shock: Effects on market volatility and social welfare," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:178:y:2023:i:c:s0965856423003063
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856423003063
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103886?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:178:y:2023:i:c:s0965856423003063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.