IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v33yi3-4p164-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governance and game theory: When do franchise auctions induce firms to overbid?

Author

Listed:
  • French, Richard D.

Abstract

The use of auctions as an instrument of public policy has been hailed as evidence of the utility and validity of game theory. In this paper, we focus on extreme cases - centrally, spectrum auctions in the UK and Germany in 2000 - to argue that the canonical game theoretic interpretations of firm behaviour in some (highly "successful") auction outcomes are inadequate, that the economics of governance critique of franchise bidding can be extended to provide a better interpretation, and that under specified conditions, notably high uncertainty, policy-makers should design franchise auctions to avoid overbidding, rather than attend to the more conventional challenge of underbidding.

Suggested Citation

  • French, Richard D., 0. "Governance and game theory: When do franchise auctions induce firms to overbid?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3-4), pages 164-175, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:33:y::i:3-4:p:164-175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596108001262
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bahia, Kalvin & Castells, Pau, 2022. "The impact of spectrum assignment policies on consumer welfare," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1).
    2. Cambini, Carlo & Garelli, Nicola, 2017. "Spectrum fees and market performance: A quantitative analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 355-366.
    3. Sheng, Li, 2010. "Competing or cooperating to host mega events: A simple model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 375-379, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:33:y::i:3-4:p:164-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.