IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v34y2012i2p138-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The introduction of robotics for New Zealand forestry operations: Forest sector employee perceptions and implications

Author

Listed:
  • Bayne, Karen M.
  • Parker, Richard J.

Abstract

Harvesting New Zealand's production forests is challenged due to a growing proportion of the plantation forest being grown on steep slopes. Advances in robotics may aid forest operations to improve productivity and cost effectively manage the growth and harvesting of logs from such difficult terrain. Robotic devices are increasingly being used in primary industry and may be used more in the future of New Zealand forestry, as many silvicultural and logging tasks could be done by machines. The greatest market drivers for the introduction of robotics include the current shortage of skilled personnel willing to undertake forestry operations, and an increasing cost of regulatory compliance. This paper identifies areas of potential advantage for robotics in the forest sector; and begins the debate on the impact on forestry workers from the introduction of such devices. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 New Zealand forestry staff involved in forest operations, to gain an understanding of their reaction to, and perceptions of, the potential use of robotics in forestry. Robotics was widely viewed as a natural progression of mechanisation for the industry, and for around a third of respondents, seen as essential in order to have an industry that remains competitive in future. Tele-operated devices could both reduce the safety risks associated with harvesting, and complement the existing skill set of forest crews. The greatest perceived concerns from robotics implementation include the impact on employment in small rural communities; the ability of robotic devices to cope with the difficult terrain of the New Zealand forest environment; and meeting economic considerations given tree and forest variability. There is, however, good potential for tele-operated devices to be introduced into forestry operations in New Zealand, and continuing dialogue with end users about and during the development of such devices will significantly smooth their introduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Bayne, Karen M. & Parker, Richard J., 2012. "The introduction of robotics for New Zealand forestry operations: Forest sector employee perceptions and implications," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 138-148.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:34:y:2012:i:2:p:138-148
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2012.02.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X1200019X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2012.02.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. MacDonald, Peter & Clow, Michael, 2010. "“Things Was Different in the South”: The industrialization of pulpwood harvesting systems in the Southeastern United States 1945–1995," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 145-160.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aymerich-Franch, Laura & Ferrer, Iliana, 2022. "Liaison, safeguard, and well-being: Analyzing the role of social robots during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    2. Cantwell, Stephen & Griffith, Garry, 2021. "Options to Improve the New Zealand Engineered Wood Value Chain: Evidence from a Systematic Literature Review," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 29(1), March.
    3. Galaz, Victor & Centeno, Miguel A. & Callahan, Peter W. & Causevic, Amar & Patterson, Thayer & Brass, Irina & Baum, Seth & Farber, Darryl & Fischer, Joern & Garcia, David & McPhearson, Timon & Jimenez, 2021. "Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Wilk-Jakubowski, Grzegorz & Harabin, Radoslaw & Ivanov, Stanislav, 2022. "Robotics in crisis management: A review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:34:y:2012:i:2:p:138-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.