IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v138y2019icp228-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the diffusion of virtual reality glasses: The role of media, fashion and technology

Author

Listed:
  • Herz, Marc
  • Rauschnabel, Philipp A.

Abstract

Facebook, Google and many other established players' future will encompass a new media format—Virtual Reality (VR)—that require novel devices such as VR glasses. While market forecasts are promising, recent diffusion rates indicate that consumer acceptance is still limited. By incorporating existing and proposing new benefits and risks through the lenses of media, technology, and fashion research, the authors develop and test a comprehensive framework to study consumer reactions to wearable VR glasses. Results of an empirical consumer study on virtual reality acceptance indicate various novel and interesting findings. For example, health and privacy risks diminish adoption rates, whereas—contrary to other technologies—psychological or physical risks—do not. Likewise, fashionable designs and wearable comfort—two novel constructs investigated in this research—matter in addition to established utilitarian and hedonic constructs. Finally, this study includes a novel perspective on media technologies by showing that VR-adoption intention is highest when consumers expect to experience both a strong sense of virtual embodiment (the sensation of being another person) and virtual presence (the sensation of being at another place), while the presence of only one of these conditions may even have a negative effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Herz, Marc & Rauschnabel, Philipp A., 2019. "Understanding the diffusion of virtual reality glasses: The role of media, fashion and technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 228-242.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:138:y:2019:i:c:p:228-242
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162517315019
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barnes, Stuart J. & Mattsson, Jan & Hartley, Nicole, 2015. "Assessing the value of real-life brands in Virtual Worlds," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 12-24.
    2. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    3. Rese, Alexandra & Baier, Daniel & Geyer-Schulz, Andreas & Schreiber, Stefanie, 2017. "How augmented reality apps are accepted by consumers: A comparative analysis using scales and opinions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 306-319.
    4. Scholz, Joachim & Smith, Andrew N., 2016. "Augmented reality: Designing immersive experiences that maximize consumer engagement," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 149-161.
    5. Jay B. Barney & Mark H. Hansen, 1994. "Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(S1), pages 175-190, December.
    6. Rauschnabel, Philipp A. & He, Jun & Ro, Young K., 2018. "Antecedents to the adoption of augmented reality smart glasses: A closer look at privacy risks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 374-384.
    7. Jason Hayhurst, 2018. "How Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality is Being Used to Support People Living with Dementia—Design Challenges and Future Directions," Progress in IS, in: Timothy Jung & M. Claudia tom Dieck (ed.), Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality, pages 295-305, Springer.
    8. Wang, Qingfeng & Sun, Xu, 2016. "Investigating gameplay intention of the elderly using an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (ETAM)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 59-68.
    9. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    10. Bastian Stock & Tiago Patrick Santos Ferreira & Claus-Peter H. Ernst, 2016. "Does Perceived Health Risk Influence Smartglasses Usage?," Progress in IS, in: Claus-Peter H. Ernst (ed.), The Drivers of Wearable Device Usage, edition 1, pages 13-23, Springer.
    11. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & James Agarwal, 2004. "Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 336-355, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kanungo, Rama Prasad & Gupta, Suraksha & Patel, Parth & Prikshat, Verma & Liu, Rui, 2022. "Digital consumption and socio-normative vulnerability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. Meißner, Martin & Pfeiffer, Jella & Peukert, Christian & Dietrich, Holger & Pfeiffer, Thies, 2020. "How virtual reality affects consumer choice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 219-231.
    3. Klein, Amarolinda & Sørensen, Carsten & Freitas, Angilberto Sabino de & Pedron, Cristiane Drebes & Elaluf-Calderwood, Silvia, 2020. "Understanding controversies in digital platform innovation processes: The Google Glass case," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Magni, Domitilla & Scuotto, Veronica & Pezzi, Alberto & Giudice, Manlio Del, 2021. "Employees’ acceptance of wearable devices: Towards a predictive model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    5. Faqih, Khaled M.S., 2022. "Factors influencing the behavioral intention to adopt a technological innovation from a developing country context: The case of mobile augmented reality games," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    6. Kostyk, Alena & Sheng, Jie, 2023. "VR in customer-centered marketing: Purpose-driven design," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 225-236.
    7. Dehghani, Milad & Lee, Seung Hwan (Mark) & Mashatan, Atefeh, 2020. "Touching holograms with windows mixed reality: Renovating the consumer retailing services," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    8. Jaung, Wanggi, 2022. "Digital forest recreation in the metaverse: Opportunities and challenges," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    9. Batat, Wided, 2021. "How augmented reality (AR) is transforming the restaurant sector: Investigating the impact of “Le Petit Chef” on customers’ dining experiences," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    10. Hung, Shiu-Wan & Cheng, Min-Jhih & Hou, Chen-En & Chen, Nai-Rong, 2021. "Inclusion in global virtual teams: Exploring non-spatial proximity and knowledge sharing on innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 599-610.
    11. Christos Mouzakis & Dimitrios Ververidis & Luis Miguel Girao & Nicolas Patz & Spiros Nikolopoulos & Ioannis Kompatsiaris, 2021. "Holistic Requirements Analysis for Specifying New Systems for 3D Media Production and Promotion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Yang Cheng & Yuan Wang & Wen Zhao, 2022. "Shared Virtual Reality Experiences during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Exploring the Gratifications and Effects of Engagement with Immersive Videos," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Rauschnabel, Philipp A. & He, Jun & Ro, Young K., 2018. "Antecedents to the adoption of augmented reality smart glasses: A closer look at privacy risks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 374-384.
    3. Morosan, Cristian, 2016. "An empirical examination of U.S. travelers’ intentions to use biometric e-gates in airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 120-128.
    4. Hsu, Sheila Hsuan-Yu & Tsou, Hung-Tai & Chen, Ja-Shen, 2021. "“Yes, we do. Why not use augmented reality?†customer responses to experiential presentations of AR-based applications," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    5. Raouf Jaziri & Mohammad Miralam, 2019. "Modelling the crowdfunding technology adoption among novice entrepreneurs: an extended tam model," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(4), pages 2159-2179, June.
    6. Faqih, Khaled M.S., 2016. "An empirical analysis of factors predicting the behavioral intention to adopt Internet shopping technology among non-shoppers in a developing country context: Does gender matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 140-164.
    7. Gao, Tao (Tony) & Rohm, Andrew J. & Sultan, Fareena & Pagani, Margherita, 2013. "Consumers un-tethered: A three-market empirical study of consumers' mobile marketing acceptance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2536-2544.
    8. Faqih, Khaled M.S., 2022. "Factors influencing the behavioral intention to adopt a technological innovation from a developing country context: The case of mobile augmented reality games," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    9. Hoffmann, Stefan & Lasarov, Wassili & Reimers, Hanna, 2022. "Carbon footprint tracking apps. What drives consumers' adoption intention?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. Julian Schuir & Frank Teuteberg, 2021. "Understanding augmented reality adoption trade-offs in production environments from the perspective of future employees: A choice-based conjoint study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1039-1085, September.
    11. Arghashi, Vahideh & Yuksel, Cenk Arsun, 2022. "Interactivity, Inspiration, and Perceived Usefulness! How retailers’ AR-apps improve consumer engagement through flow," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & Ashutosh Patil, 2006. "Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1865-1883, December.
    13. Mütterlein, Joschka & Kunz, Reinhard E. & Baier, Daniel, 2019. "Effects of lead-usership on the acceptance of media innovations: A mobile augmented reality case," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 113-124.
    14. Skubis Michał, 2021. "Users’ Awareness of Augmented Reality Technology in Mobile Applications," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 40(2), pages 1-22, June.
    15. Ewers, Karolina & Baier, Daniel & Höhn, Nadine, 2020. "Siri, Do I like You? Digital Voice Assistants and Their Acceptance by Consumers," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 4(1), pages 52-68.
    16. Rauschnabel, Philipp A. & Felix, Reto & Hinsch, Chris, 2019. "Augmented reality marketing: How mobile AR-apps can improve brands through inspiration," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 43-53.
    17. Chaouali, Walid & Ben Yahia, Imene & Souiden, Nizar, 2016. "The interplay of counter-conformity motivation, social influence, and trust in customers' intention to adopt Internet banking services: The case of an emerging country," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 209-218.
    18. Abhishek Behl & Pankaj Dutta & Zongwei Luo & Pratima Sheorey, 2022. "Enabling artificial intelligence on a donation-based crowdfunding platform: a theoretical approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 761-789, December.
    19. Im, Hyunjoo & Ha, Young, 2013. "Enablers and inhibitors of permission-based marketing: A case of mobile coupons," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 495-503.
    20. Sarv Devaraj & Robert F. Easley & J. Michael Crant, 2008. "Research Note ---How Does Personality Matter? Relating the Five-Factor Model to Technology Acceptance and Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 93-105, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:138:y:2019:i:c:p:228-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.