IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v80y2010i1p1-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tests for normality in classes of skew-t alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Carota, Cinzia

Abstract

We construct tests for normality in the Azzalini and Capitanio skew-t and linear skew-t classes of distributions. We also provide an explanation for the presence of the inflection point at zero in the skew-normal log-likelihood when it is obtained from a skew-t log-likelihood with degrees of freedom tending to infinity.

Suggested Citation

  • Carota, Cinzia, 2010. "Tests for normality in classes of skew-t alternatives," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 1-8, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:80:y:2010:i:1:p:1-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(09)00346-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. C. Jones & M. J. Faddy, 2003. "A skew extension of the t‐distribution, with applications," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(1), pages 159-174, February.
    2. Adelchi Azzalini & Antonella Capitanio, 2003. "Distributions generated by perturbation of symmetry with emphasis on a multivariate skew t‐distribution," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(2), pages 367-389, May.
    3. Cinzia Carota, 2005. "Symmetric diagnostics for the analysis of the residuals in regression models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 92(4), pages 787-799, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dante Amengual & Xinyue Bei & Enrique Sentana, 2022. "Normal but skewed?," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(7), pages 1295-1313, November.
    2. Aldo Goia & Ernesto Salinelli & Pascal Sarda, 2015. "A new powerful version of the BUS test of normality," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 24(3), pages 449-474, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jorge E. Galán & María Rodríguez Moreno, 2020. "At-risk measures and financial stability," Financial Stability Review, Banco de España, issue Autumn.
    2. Yeap, Claudia & Kwok, Simon S. & Choy, S. T. Boris, 2016. "A Flexible Generalised Hyperbolic Option Pricing Model and its Special Cases," Working Papers 2016-14, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
    3. Antonio Parisi & B. Liseo, 2018. "Objective Bayesian analysis for the multivariate skew-t model," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 27(2), pages 277-295, June.
    4. Ali Genç, 2013. "A skew extension of the slash distribution via beta-normal distribution," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 427-442, May.
    5. Alexander, Carol & Cordeiro, Gauss M. & Ortega, Edwin M.M. & Sarabia, José María, 2012. "Generalized beta-generated distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1880-1897.
    6. Ekaterina Abramova & Derek Bunn, 2020. "Forecasting the Intra-Day Spread Densities of Electricity Prices," Papers 2002.10566, arXiv.org.
    7. Busetti, Fabio & Caivano, Michele & Delle Monache, Davide & Pacella, Claudia, 2021. "The time-varying risk of Italian GDP," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    8. Abdou Kâ Diongue & Dominique Guegan & Rodney C. Wolff, 2008. "Exact Maximum Likelihood estimation for the BL-GARCH model under elliptical distributed innovations," Post-Print halshs-00270719, HAL.
    9. Saralees Nadarajah & Bo Zhang & Stephen Chan, 2014. "Estimation methods for expected shortfall," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 271-291, February.
    10. Ekaterina Abramova & Derek Bunn, 2019. "Estimating Dynamic Conditional Spread Densities to Optimise Daily Storage Trading of Electricity," Papers 1903.06668, arXiv.org.
    11. Abdou Kâ Diongue & Dominique Guegan, 2008. "Estimation of k-factor GIGARCH process : a Monte Carlo study," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00235179, HAL.
    12. Angelica Gianfreda & Derek Bunn, 2018. "A Stochastic Latent Moment Model for Electricity Price Formation," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS46, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.
    13. Allen, David & Lizieri, Colin & Satchell, Stephen, 2020. "A comparison of non-Gaussian VaR estimation and portfolio construction techniques," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 356-368.
    14. Abdou Kâ Diongue & Dominique Guegan & Rodney C. Wolff, 2010. "BL-GARCH model with elliptical distributed innovations," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00368340, HAL.
    15. Derek W. Bunn & Angelica Gianfreda & Stefan Kermer, 2018. "A Trading-Based Evaluation of Density Forecasts in a Real-Time Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, October.
    16. Rossi, Barbara & Ganics, Gergely & Sekhposyan, Tatevik, 2020. "From Fixed-event to Fixed-horizon Density Forecasts: Obtaining Measures of Multi-horizon Uncertainty from Survey Density Foreca," CEPR Discussion Papers 14267, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. C. Adcock, 2010. "Asset pricing and portfolio selection based on the multivariate extended skew-Student-t distribution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 221-234, April.
    18. Lengua Lafosse, Patricia & Rodríguez, Gabriel, 2018. "An empirical application of a stochastic volatility model with GH skew Student's t-distribution to the volatility of Latin-American stock returns," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 155-173.
    19. Gergely Ganics & Barbara Rossi & Tatevik Sekhposyan, 2019. "From fixed-event to fixed-horizon density forecasts: Obtaining measures of multi-horizon uncertainty from survey density forecasts," Economics Working Papers 1689, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    20. Mehmet Niyazi Çankaya & Abdullah Yalçınkaya & Ömer Altındaǧ & Olcay Arslan, 2019. "On the robustness of an epsilon skew extension for Burr III distribution on the real line," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1247-1273, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:80:y:2010:i:1:p:1-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.