IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v152y2019icp89-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On general Bayesian inference using loss functions

Author

Listed:
  • Bissiri, Pier Giovanni
  • Walker, Stephen G.

Abstract

Bissiri et al. (2016) propose a framework for general Bayesian inference using loss functions which connect parameters with data, and the updated posterior distribution is characterized through a set of axioms. The result, which is restricted to finite probability spaces, is extended in this paper to spaces which are subsets of the real line.

Suggested Citation

  • Bissiri, Pier Giovanni & Walker, Stephen G., 2019. "On general Bayesian inference using loss functions," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 89-91.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:152:y:2019:i:c:p:89-91
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2019.04.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715219301087
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2019.04.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pier Bissiri & Stephen Walker, 2012. "Converting information into probability measures with the Kullback–Leibler divergence," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 64(6), pages 1139-1160, December.
    2. P. G. Bissiri & C. C. Holmes & S. G. Walker, 2016. "A general framework for updating belief distributions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(5), pages 1103-1130, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malmendier, Ulrike & Pouzo, Demian & Vanasco, Victoria, 2020. "Investor experiences and international capital flows," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    2. Romain Fournier & Zoi Tsangalidou & David Reich & Pier Francesco Palamara, 2023. "Haplotype-based inference of recent effective population size in modern and ancient DNA samples," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Toru Kitagawa & Hugo Lopez & Jeff Rowley, 2022. "Stochastic Treatment Choice with Empirical Welfare Updating," Papers 2211.01537, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    4. Ruben Loaiza‐Maya & Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier, 2021. "Focused Bayesian prediction," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(5), pages 517-543, August.
    5. David T. Frazier & Ruben Loaiza-Maya & Gael M. Martin, 2021. "Variational Bayes in State Space Models: Inferential and Predictive Accuracy," Papers 2106.12262, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    6. Rong Tang & Yun Yang, 2022. "Bayesian inference for risk minimization via exponentially tilted empirical likelihood," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1257-1286, September.
    7. Fabio Canova & Christian Matthes, 2021. "Dealing with misspecification in structural macroeconometric models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(2), pages 313-350, May.
    8. Yahia Abdel-Aty & Mohamed Kayid & Ghadah Alomani, 2023. "Generalized Bayes Estimation Based on a Joint Type-II Censored Sample from K-Exponential Populations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-11, May.
    9. Jack Jewson & David Rossell, 2022. "General Bayesian loss function selection and the use of improper models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(5), pages 1640-1665, November.
    10. The Tien Mai, 2023. "An efficient adaptive MCMC algorithm for Pseudo-Bayesian quantum tomography," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 827-843, June.
    11. Simon N. Wood, 2020. "Inference and computation with generalized additive models and their extensions," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(2), pages 307-339, June.
    12. Noel Cressie, 2023. "Decisions, decisions, decisions in an uncertain environment," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), February.
    13. Tsionas, Mike G., 2023. "Joint production in stochastic non-parametric envelopment of data with firm-specific directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1336-1347.
    14. Takuo Matsubara & Jeremias Knoblauch & François‐Xavier Briol & Chris J. Oates, 2022. "Robust generalised Bayesian inference for intractable likelihoods," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(3), pages 997-1022, July.
    15. Smith, Simon C. & Timmermann, Allan & Zhu, Yinchu, 2019. "Variable selection in panel models with breaks," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 323-344.
    16. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Christian P. Robert, 2020. "Computing Bayes: Bayesian Computation from 1763 to the 21st Century," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 14/20, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    17. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Ruben Loaiza-Maya & Florian Huber & Gary Koop & John Maheu & Didier Nibbering & Anastasios Panagiotelis, 2023. "Bayesian Forecasting in the 21st Century: A Modern Review," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 1/23, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    18. Zhichao Liu & Catherine Forbes & Heather Anderson, 2017. "Robust Bayesian exponentially tilted empirical likelihood method," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 21/17, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    19. Andrew Gelman & Christian Hennig, 2017. "Beyond subjective and objective in statistics," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(4), pages 967-1033, October.
    20. Nicole H. Lewis & David B. Hitchcock & Ian L. Dryden & John R. Rose, 2018. "Peptide refinement by using a stochastic search," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 1207-1236, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:152:y:2019:i:c:p:89-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.